## Summary
The environment is located at a stable path within the cache, based on
the script's absolute path.
If a lockfile exists for the script, then we use our standard lockfile
semantics (i.e., update the lockfile if necessary, etc.); if not, we
just do a `uv pip sync` (roughly).
Example usage:
```
❯ uv init --script hello.py
Initialized script at `hello.py`
❯ uv add --script hello.py requests
Updated `hello.py`
❯ cargo run sync --script hello.py
Using script environment at: /Users/crmarsh/.cache/uv/environments-v1/hello-84e289fe3f6241a0
Resolved 5 packages in 3ms
Installed 5 packages in 12ms
+ certifi==2025.1.31
+ charset-normalizer==3.4.1
+ idna==3.10
+ requests==2.32.3
+ urllib3==2.3.0
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6637.
## Summary
The [current scripts docs
page](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/guides/scripts/) doesn't include detail
on how to use a custom package index when setting up a script. I believe
this might be because it didn't use to work (see #6688 ) but it now does
(thanks for that, by the way! 😄)
Given it's a useful feature, I suggest adding a quick example to the
scripts page, with the details of authentication, etc. left to the main
`indexes.md` doc.
I'd also suggests that this closes#6688, though it doesn't actually add
that feature - that appears to have already been done :)
## Test Plan
No testing is needed, I think!
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Use `UV_INDEX` instead of the deprecated `UV_EXTRA_INDEX_URL`.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
It is a minor documentation change.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This adds `NO_BINARY` and `NO_BINARY_PACKAGE` environment variables to
the uv CLI, allowing the user to specify packages to build from source
using environment variables. Its not a complete fix for #4291 as it does
not handle the `pip` subcommand.
## Test Plan
This was tested by running `uv sync` with various `UV_NO_BINARY` and
`UV_NO_BINARY_PACKAGE` environment variables set and checking that the
correct set of packages were compiled rather than taken from pre-built
wheels.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I've just fixed some broken anchors after browing ux doc site.
## Test Plan
- `index.md`: based on `mkdocs serve` log
- `readme.md`: manual check
## Aside
Do you manually keep `readme.md` and `index.md` partially sync? I've
tried
checking pre-commit and other scripts but found no way to port my edits
from one
to the other.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
I followed the docs to install flash-attn with uv and got the following
issue
```uv sync
Resolved 27 packages in 12ms
× Failed to build `flash-attn==2.7.4.post1`
├─▶ The build backend returned an error
╰─▶ Call to `setuptools.build_meta:__legacy__.build_wheel` failed (exit status: 1)
[stderr]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 8, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
hint: This usually indicates a problem with the package or the build environment.
```
installing setuptools before running uv sync as done with torch helps
fix it.
## Test Plan
I tested locally before it failed to install, after it worked
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
- PowerShell isn't Windows-only
- Bash/Elvish isn't UNIX-only
- PowerShell profile won't necessarily exist
- Extracted the `echo $SHELL` tip to a tip tooltip
The new PowerShell lines are taken directly from
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/microsoft.powershell.core/about/about_profiles?view=powershell-7.5#how-to-create-a-profile
Note that the "Standalone installer" commands are unaffected. Running
the Linux one through PowerShell worked just fine.
## Test Plan
Look at the page generated from this PR
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I think `UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT` is too complicated for use-cases where
the user wants to sync to the active environment. I don't see a
compelling reason not to make opt-in easier. I see a lot of questions
about how to deal with this warning in the issue tracker, but it seems
painful to collect them here for posterity.
A notable behavior here — we'll treat this as equivalent to
`UV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENT` so... if you point us to a valid virtual
environment that needs to be recreated for some reason (e.g., new Python
version request), we'll happily delete it and start over.
Since the resolver internals docs were written, we added a lot more
features to the resolver, which should be documented.
As usual, these docs are not targeted at regular users, but should give
interested readers an insight into the internals of uv and help advanced
users with especially hard resolver problems.
## Summary
It turns out activating the kernel does not change `VIRTUAL_ENV`, so we
still install into the environment the Jupyter environment, rather than
the project environment.
Unfortunately, after this change, we do still show a warning on `uv
add`:
```
warning: `VIRTUAL_ENV=/Users/crmarsh/.cache/uv/archive-v0/3bddKDdYXuX2w57Fu6itL` does not match the project environment path `.venv` and will be ignored
```
`uv pip install` works without warning.
Closes#11154.
We regularly get questions why `uv build` is missing certain files or
using the wrong build tag, when that's done by the build backend and
part of the build backend's docs. I tried to clarify this difference and
to redirect users to look at the tool's docs instead of wondering why
uv's docs don't explain that.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ed Morley <501702+edmorley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Maybe slightly controversial because it's more verbose, but we really
want to limit these indexes to Linux and Windows, rather than ignoring
them on Darwin. E.g., we'd also want to ignore them on other platforms.
Further down, I use markers that look like this in the more complete
examples, so this feels more consistent.
This PR rewords the instructions for using uv in a container. I'm a new
user and was somewhat confused by it, so I've rewritten it as I'd have
liked to have read it.
It makes it more clear what distroless means, to avoid confusion with
other projects that ship OS files with an image with its tag name clear
of qualifiers(`astral-sh/uv`, in this case). An example of that is
caddy, which ships with alpine.
This also modifies the original example to use a distroful image instead
of distroless one while #8635 doesn't get resolved.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Fixes a recurring typo.
## Details
There's a typo appearing in a particular sentence...
> Ignore package dependencies, instead only add those packages
explicitly listed on the command line to the resulting **the**
requirements file.
... used in:
* `crates/uv-cli/src/lib.rs`
* `crates/uv-settings-src-settings.rs`
* `docs/reference/settings.md`
* `uv.schem.json`
Docs, comments and a CLI command description seem affected.
This PR fixes it.
---------
Co-authored-by: bujnok01 <bujnok01@heiway.net>
I'm not sure if this should go in the CLI reference or not? but here
seems like an okay start. I want to figure out a way to avoid repeating
this content.
I'm sorry, but I was writing some new content here and the inconsistent
wrapping was very hard to maintain and I didn't want to muddy the diff
there with reflowing.
I don't think we need to be strict about the reflow (I'm not sure we
even can be) but some of these were very far off from our typical wrap
length.
## Summary
The latter issue has been closed in favour of the former, so just link
the one issue Dependabot is using to track this.
## Test Plan
N/A
---
Thanks!
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
