## Summary
I noticed that after first installing the free-threaded version, then
the gil version of 3.14, I wasn't able
to install greenlet, because it doesn't ship with wheels for the
free-threaded version (I think it isn't
safe for it to use that interpreter). I noticed that the change made in
3.14 wasn't updated in the docs.
## Test Plan
N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Wade Roberts <wade.roberts@centralsquare.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
I'm a little wary here, in the sense that it might be silly to have a
command that does something so simple that's covered by `uv workspace
metadata`? but I think this could be stabilized much faster than `uv
workspace metadata` and makes it easier to write scripts against
workspace members.
---------
Co-authored-by: liam <liam@scalzulli.com>
Addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13636
Prints the path to the workspace root by default, and any of the child
packages if requested.
I looped it into the same preview flag as `workspace metadata`, given
how closely related they are.
## Summary
```
─> uv workspace dir
/Users/mikayla/code/uv/dev-envs
─> uv workspace dir --package foo-proj
/Users/mikayla/code/uv/dev-envs/foo-proj
─> uv workspace dir --package bar-proj
error: Package `bar-proj` not found in workspace.
```
## Test Plan
Unit tests added.
---------
Signed-off-by: Mikayla Thompson <mrt@mikayla.codes>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
This adds the scaffolding for a `uv workspace metadata` command, as an
equivalent to `cargo metadata`, for integration with downstream tools. I
didn't do much here beyond emit the workspace root path and the paths of
the workspace members. I explored doing a bit more in #16638, but I
think we're actually going to want to come up with a fairly
comprehensive schema like `cargo metadata` has. I've started exploring
that too, but I don't have a concrete proposal to share yet.
I don't want this to be a top-level command because I think people would
expect `uv metadata <PACKAGE>` to show metadata about arbitrary packages
(this has been requested several times). I also think we can do other
things in the workspace namespace to make trivial integrations simpler,
like `uv workspace list` (enumerate members) and `uv workspace dir`
(show the path to the workspace root).
I don't expect this to be stable at all to start. I've both gated it
with preview and hidden it from the help. The intent is to merge so we
can iterate on it as we figure out what integrations need.
Addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/15790
## Summary
After discussion, the functionality of `--project` vs `--directory` was
quite unclear in this case, so deprecating `--project` for `init` is
probably the clearest behavior option. This is a breaking change, so it
requires being under preview before being rolled out fully.
Included in the PR now:
- new feature flag (`init --project` is deprecated if `--preview` or
`--preview-features deprecate-project-for-init` are provided)
- tests (for `--directory` behavior, as well as the current warning and
future error)
- documentation updated in docs/concepts/projects/init.md
---------
Signed-off-by: Mikayla Thompson <mrt@mikayla.codes>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
I am a new uv user and I was reading the docs to better understand the
project scope & best practices. The section on [signal
forwarding](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/concepts/projects/run/#signal-handling)
with `uv run` caught my eye because I've used tools that use SIGHUP to
trigger config reloads or SIGUSR1/2 to enable debugging/profiling/etc so
I was a little concerned about using a runner that might block those
signals. After some searching in issues/PRs, I found that this behavior
was actually [changed earlier this
year](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/13017) to forward additional
signals (awesome!) and thought I would update the docs and save the next
person/llm from thinking their tool won't work as expected if it uses
custom signal handling.
Thanks for all your great work!
P.S. If you think it makes more sense to explicitly list all forwarded
signals as opposed to just the exclusions, I'm happy to edit.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Corrects example command for generating pylock.toml from requirements.in
## Test Plan
Local preview
I specifically show more details than necessary in the example to make
it more clear that this is *NOT* the normal dependency-groups table.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
We're not sure what the best way to expose the native store to users is
yet and it's a bit weird that you can use this in the `uv auth` commands
but can't use any of the other keyring provider options. The simplest
path forward is to just not expose it to users as a keyring provider,
and instead frame it as a preview alternative to the plaintext uv
credentials store. We can revisit the best way to expose configuration
before stabilization.
Note this pull request retains the _internal_ keyring provider
implementation — we can refactor it out later but I wanted to avoid a
bunch of churn here.
Zanie Blue
Tom Schafer
pythonweb2
konsti
Zsolt Dollenstein
Mikayla Thompson
Matthijs Kok
Brian Dentino
William Woodruff
chance
Charlie Marsh
Aria Desires
Anthony Wu