Worker B's comparability caution: the redundancy score is the MAXIMUM of the 2/3/4-gram repeat
ratios, so a high score means 'some length scale is very repetitive', not 'repetitive at every
scale'. Any implementation using a mean or a different normalisation gives non-comparable
numbers, which matters because workers were sharing rankings across partitions. Pinned in the
tool's docstring with this tool named as the reference implementation.
107: finding 43's goto lever is NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT -- worker B found it overshoots
(152 vs 140) on 0x800FCA90, and this is the second independent instance after worker A's
0x800256F0. Treat it as one attempt, not as the fix.
Christopher Williams
17e3b4496f