Worker A built a repetitiveness score (repeated 2/3/4-instruction opcode subsequences,
normalised by body length) and produced the cleanest controlled comparison in the phase:
3 spellings on a 248 B repetitive row vs 9 failures on a 176 B tie-break-dense one. That
converts 'prefer a repetitive body' from a hunch into a sortable number, so size is
deprioritised as the ranking signal.
Also recorded: a transposed temp array is byte-required (int m[3][4] used as m[c][r]) with an
exact diagnostic -- right length + right instruction multiset + residual only on sp-relative
offsets means the frame LAYOUT is wrong, not the code; and when the original stores the same
slot twice, suspect two source statements rather than a scheduler quirk (GCC 2.7.2 has no DSE).
Christopher Williams
1a6a00970f