Worker A's two adjacent claims (0x80036B14, 0x80036DA4).
Cookbook 95 is the cleanest diagnostic of the phase: a correct-length candidate whose residual
is a handful of BRANCH WORDS means the block NESTING is wrong, not the code inside the blocks.
Worker A got exactly 656 bytes (correct length) with exactly 2 differing bytes, both branch
displacements, by writing two guards as siblings instead of nested. Residual = 2 bytes at a
branch displacement => go look at your braces.
Also: the project's 4-int vector type is identifiable from the frame (multiple of 16 with
offsets stepping by 16); vector copies are struct assignments (third independent confirmation);
and an OPEN question is recorded -- 'the original spills everything, cc1 promotes' -- with a
request for a recipe from any worker who has solved it.
Christopher Williams
2472e2e2c1