Worker E's 0x8002311C (160 B) CLOSES COOKBOOK 123'S OPEN QUESTION. Finding 123 recorded the
branchless MAX0 (x & -(x > 0)) as unreached -- 'no ternary and no bitwise spelling reached it'.
Worker E solved it: the lever is NAMING THE BOOLEAN.
return s & -(s > 0); -> BRANCHES
return s > 0 ? s : 0; -> branches
flag = s > 0; return s & -flag; -> EXACT (slt / negu / and)
Mechanism: naming the comparison forces cc1 to materialise it as a VALUE (slt) rather than a
test feeding a branch. That is finding 44's 'name the boolean' lever applied to the MAX half --
finding 44 previously had only the cond-into-&& direction for this family.
167: a 4-byte store cc1 DELETES means the object's address is never taken -- fold the word into
the array whose address IS taken by a call.
168: s = f(); s += f(); s += f(); loses one instruction vs three named results summed.
Christopher Williams
c091483083