- NEW family_cousins.py --aprop-cards + tools/wave/aprop_wave.js: lane A (1,700 open fns /
76,419 ins) had NO card type — cousin diffs are empty for h_seq-identical members, so the card
is a positional WORD diff vs the matched sibling, grouped BY FAMILY (one agent, N drafts).
Head cards: 13 families / 433 members, median TWO differing words each.
- calibration 9 batches / 108 members: 98 agent-MATCH (91%, best of any wave) -> 56 BANKED (57%),
~80k tok/banked fn vs 157k (cousin card) vs 400k+ (crack wave). R22 213/213 BYTE-IDENTICAL.
- HONEST GAP (R14): 91% agent -> 57% gate is the worst conversion measured; 14 groups banked 0.
Hypothesis TESTABLE not proven — family batching concentrates members per destination TU, the
§169 collision. Re-gate unbanked ONE PER TU before scaling the remaining 320.
- >=16 head diagnosed: 3 of 4 blockers are plumbing — the --band substantial default hid 5 of 13
families from every prior sweep; one missing file-scope extern (D_801ED98C) gates 56 PURE
members; dedup_extend is macro-only. Only func_8017C294 is a genuine crack.
- fleet 96.56% fn / 95.2% instr / 89.9% distinct; stubs 12,535 -> 12,468; dedup 2,043/0.
- cookbook §170.
- thresholds relaxed to <=6 blocks/<=16 tokens UNION edit-fraction <=0.20: cards 518 -> 721,
MIXED 310 -> 50 skeletons; the 753-ins func_8017BEBC (0.987 sim) became reachable.
- 59 cards -> 48 agent-MATCH (81%) -> 44 BANKED (92% MATCH->bank, 75% end-to-end), 6.9M tok.
- FINDING (the actionable one): 7b's bank rate crushed 7a's because it SPREAD 48 drafts over 35
destination TUs; 7a's failures were per-TU declaration collisions between sibling drafts.
Cookbook §169 updated with the spread law.
- R22 213/213 BYTE-IDENTICAL from clean; fleet 96.55% fn / 95.2% instr / 89.9% distinct;
stubs 12,584 -> 12,535; dedup 2,035/0.
- incidents 3 & 4 recorded: an agent wrote a TRACKED header (guard caught it, prose is not
enforcement); my own gate_lane filtered on the wrong key and printed 'gating 0 drafts' as a
result (R32 silent skip) — fixed with a coverage assertion that refuses to report 0.
- family_cousins.py --adapt-cards: per seeded-unit member, drift classified vs the seed
(LI-ONLY 27 / SMALL-EDIT 491 / MIXED 310 excluded); cards carry the seed C location + the
aligned diff blocks with the member's raw words + disasm (the new constant is readable in
the card). 518 cards / 1,101 instances / 23,820 ins; 514 haiku-band.
- tools/wave/adapt_wave.js: the EDIT-contract wave (crack_wave contracts preserved: per-agent
dirs, sha1-last, UNVERIFIED != refuted); symbol surface from the TARGET .s; haiku<=60/sonnet.
- regen chain absorbed the 48 lane-A banks (A-prop open ins -6,475 == the report's instr
delta exactly — two independent derivations agree); pilot slate .run/wave7a_pilot.json (30).
- R37: pilot before scaling to the 518-card pool.
A markdown backtick inside the prompt's template literal terminates the string
and the workflow dies at parse time. Cheap (0 agents, 0 tokens) but it has now
cost two launches, so the file carries a warning at the top: use double quotes
for inline code in prompt prose.
Wave 5 wrote its drafts into .run/wave4/ because the script was built by
sed-ing the wave-3 copy. Harmless (per-function dirs) but wrong. Pass
{wave:'waveN'} on any target; defaults to '.run/wave/' so a missing field can
never silently reuse a prior wave's directory. Meta name/description are now
generic too — this is THE crack-wave script, not wave 4's copy.
A prior attempt that was GATE-REFUSED (standalone MATCH, whole-binary DIFF) has
an in-TU residual, so the standalone gate cannot see it. A wave-5 agent closed
exactly this by splicing into the real destination TU, running the pinned
triple end-to-end, and masked-diffing the function out of the WHOLE-TU object
(0 mismatched, 279/279). That is now instruction, not luck.
Carries both gotchas it paid for: the wrong --aspsx-version produces ~32
spurious mismatches all of the ori-vs-addiu li-form shape (the fingerprint of a
version mismatch, not a codegen residual), and engine_core.h resolves relative
to the including file so the spliced TU needs a directory + shared symlink.
Also warns that two wave-5 agents found their predecessor's file/line citations
wrong while its idioms were right — re-derive the TU, don't trust quoted lines.
crack_wave.js classified anything without verdict_check.confirmed as 'refuted'.
When the usage limit killed 22 verifiers mid-wave, the result read
'refuted: 22' — 22 good drafts reported as rejected, with evidence 'verifier
died' as the only tell. Acting on that would have discarded the wave.
Same disease as the no-diagnostic classifier (S47) and this session's
poisoned-tree 0/17: a tool stating a conclusion it never reached. UNVERIFIED is
now its own outcome, returned with the draft path and sha1 and the instruction
'VERIFIER NEVER RAN — re-verify, do not discard'.
A workflow script is plain JS; the cookbook citation I added used markdown
backticks inside a template string, which terminated it. Caught at launch
(parse error, 0 agents, 0 tokens) rather than mid-wave.
The wave script encodes contracts paid for in real failures (per-agent output
dirs after wave 2 lost 21 verified drafts; sha1-last verification; prior-notes
seeding at 7/9 then 10/12; size routing). It was living only in the workflow
scratch dir, so each wave rebuilt it from memory — which is how the cookbook
citation list went stale: it still named only §162 while §163 and §164 (87 more
entries) had been banked in between.
Updated the citation list to §160-§164 and pointed agents at §164z, the 28
REFUTED claims, so they do not re-derive a disproved mechanism.
Drew T