Commit Graph

16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Drew T 3ba4d6fec1 phase-36: T7 sweep s3b — the constant-holder draw re-run: 1 of 80 (6 bodies), BUDGET 59 of 80
search: 1 of 80 exemplars matched lever-free in 0.89 h (6 of 486 bodies behind them; 28,042 compiles) — BUDGET 59 · NO-MATCH 18 · UNSTRIPPABLE 2 · MATCH 1

- func_801621CC by R6 inline lo + R7 do-while; delever --propagate: 5 of 5 sibling(s) banked, 0 refused.
- the figure that prices the draw is BUDGET 59 of 80: three quarters of the remaining bodies exhausted 400 compiles rather
  than being refuted, so this family is sampled, not measured. s3 had already taken its cheap half (10 bodies).
- two UNSTRIPPABLE recorded by name: func_8017DC80 (a launder with 2 outputs), func_80181A4C (instruction lw has no C
  spelling in the table).
- check-all: 218 passed, 0 failed of 218
  lever_census --check: 29,527 pin/asm sites, 29,527 marked !FAKE, 0 UNMARKED — OK
- snapshot row 14. Loop economics two agents in (R41): 30,358 -> 29,527 sites, 9,747 -> 9,320 bodies; the agents' own two
  bodies account for 255 of that and their toolified moves for the other 576, at zero drafting tokens.
2026-09-10 03:44:53 -06:00
Drew T 5603a114c2 phase-36: T7 sweeps s2/s3 — the constant-holder census corrected (537 of 17,302, not 284 of 10,958) and 10 bodies closed; the propagate namespace bug fixed
- s2 (the head, with R16/R17 added): search: 0 of 140 exemplars matched lever-free in 0.24 h (0 of 7,085 bodies behind
  them; 23,689 compiles). The two new generators closed nothing on the head; recorded as measured.
- agent a2's "284 constant-holder pins of 10,958" verified against the source rather than believed (R14), and my first
  instrument was wrong (R40): asking R16 directly answered 33, because R16 only fires on a split declaration while most
  pins carry their value as an initialiser. R3 converts one form to the other, so the reachable family is R3+R16.
  Corrected, both figures derived: 537 constant-holder pin sites of 17,302, in 510 bodies (152 initialiser, 385 separate
  assignment; by register $2 282, $20 136, $3 28).
- s3 drew exactly those 99 function names and closed 10 bodies before crashing with
  AttributeError: 'Namespace' object has no attribute 'allow_residue'
  in propagate — the a2 fix read the flag off the caller's namespace and the search engine builds its own Namespace for
  that in-process call. Fixed with getattr(a, "allow_residue", False): a library must not assume its caller's namespace
  shape (R43).
- the ten banks were real, proven by gating the tree the crash left:
  check-all: 218 passed, 0 failed of 218
  lever_census --check: 29,533 pin/asm sites, 29,533 marked !FAKE, 0 UNMARKED — OK
- by first move the ten are R15 x3, R6 x4, R7 x2, R9 x1 — the draw was right about the family even though R16 did not fire.
- snapshot row 13; s3 re-runs from the top with the fix.
2026-09-10 02:49:05 -06:00
Drew T 9c5ca46a2a phase-36: T7 agent a2 — func_80168828 at score 0 with the constant-holder pin deleted (125 bodies; 29,697 → 29,572 sites, R22 218/218)
- two moves: delete `register s32 c40 __asm__("$3")` and its `c40 = 0x40;`, writing the literal at its four uses (byte-neutral
  on its own — the pin was never doing the work); then swap the adjacent `f1e = 0x40;` and `f1a = 0x10;` so the 0x10 store
  splits the run of 0x40 stores.
- the residual reads like cse/sched and the decision is local-alloc's. Dumps of the real TU in both orderings differ on one
  .lreg line — `Register 76 used 5 times across 10 insns` -> `across 14 insns`, `Register 76 in 2.` -> `in 3.` — which is
  find_free_reg's live-range scan at local-alloc.c:2109-2110: unswapped the two constants' ranges are disjoint and share $v0,
  swapped they overlap and the first takes $v1.
- the $4 pin STAYS, and not as a lever: src/shared/ov/func_801687CC.h declares extern void func_80168828(void), so the
  target's `move s1,a0` has no C source. An uninitialised local, a pointer-typed one, a split declaration and deleting it
  outright all give the identical score-25 residual; both parameter forms are hard cc1 errors against that header. This is
  the first measured pin that only a declaration fix can remove — one of the 51 conflicts P35 ledgered for the types phase.
  The engine's score-1 text is a coincidence (its andi truncates garbage in $s1 and never reads $a0); not proposed.
- instrument fixed in the same change: --propagate refused all 124 siblings because the reshape deliberately keeps a lever.
  The allowance is now derived from the exemplar's own banked text (its surviving !FAKE markers), and a sibling whose remap
  would carry more levers than the exemplar is refused by name.
  delever --propagate: 124 of 124 sibling(s) banked, 0 refused
- check-all: 218 passed, 0 failed of 218
  lever_census --check: 29,572 pin/asm sites, 29,572 marked !FAKE, 0 UNMARKED — OK
- snapshot row 12; delever --selftest OK. The toolify (R16, the constant-run split) follows.
2026-09-10 01:23:22 -06:00
Drew T c00ffe5d44 phase-36: T7 sweep s1 — the R15 sink closes 6 more exemplars for free (267 bodies, 4 compiles each; 30,098 → 29,697 sites, R22 218/218)
The harvest half of agent a1 paying off. With R15 in the registry the engine was swept over the rest of the residue head
(--only the 56 other head functions, which draws every body of those names: 147 exemplars judged).

  search: 6 of 147 exemplars matched lever-free in 0.28 h (267 of 7,477 bodies behind them; 23,892 compiles) — NO-MATCH 141 · MATCH 6

- all six closes are R15, each in FOUR compiles: func_8013EB7C (126 + 7 copies) and func_8016DF5C (127 + 4 + 2 + 1) across
  their fleet copies. Every propagation 0 refused. R15 also moved func_80136824 from 21 to 2 as a first move.
- the loop's economics with denominators (R41): one agent's reading (~221k tokens) bought 130 bodies directly and 267 more
  for zero tokens — 397 bodies, 30,358 -> 29,697 sites (-661).
- check-all: 218 passed, 0 failed of 218
  lever_census --check: 29,697 pin/asm sites, 29,697 marked !FAKE, 0 UNMARKED — OK
- snapshot row 11 (9,617 -> 9,350 bodies); the checkpoint headline and loop state refreshed (R101).
2026-09-10 01:04:42 -06:00
Drew T fd2433b6d2 phase-36: T7 agent a1 — func_80156044 closed at score 0 by DELETING two locals (130 bodies banked, 30,358 → 30,098 sites, R22 218/218)
The first agent of the one-at-a-time T7 loop, on the rank-1 head class (130 copies, two NEEDED pins $2/$3). Six mechanical
rung-G runs had been stuck at best 1 on this body; the agent closed it at 0.

- the move is not a dial: the iVar3/puVar2 pair that every arm of the if/else chain set is deleted, and each arm gets the
  whole address expression (puVar4 = &D_80192454 + (((u32)param_2) & 0xffff) * 0x14). Two locals fewer than the levered
  text — shorter AND byte-identical, which is what this phase is for.
- mechanism, read from gcc 2.7.2's own source and confirmed in the .lreg/.greg dumps: scoping the base into the arm makes
  the block hold THREE local quantities instead of two, and block_alloc's unrolled case 3 (local-alloc.c:1491-1496) falls
  through into case 2 and applies qty_compare(0,1) a second time, undoing its own exchange — so the $2/$3 assignment flips
  (density formula local-alloc.c:1578-1596); deleting the cross-block variable also takes it out of global.c, where
  set_preference (global.c:1535+) had given it a copy preference for $5 through puVar4's argument copy, merged by
  expand_preferences (global.c:781-825) and overriding first-fit at global.c:1034-1067.
- why the engine could not find it: the u16-width move six runs found is a local optimum that IMITATES the fix by
  manufacturing the third quantity while paying an andi. No generator in the registry deletes a variable, so the search
  could not leave that basin. That is the toolify target and it follows in its own commit (R16).
- verified before banking (--try: score 0, mine 74 ins, target 74 — MATCH), then
  delever --apply-body: ... IDENTICAL on 1 object(s) (0.11 s) — KEPT, ledgered (rung E, a1)
  delever --propagate: 129 of 129 sibling(s) banked, 0 refused
  check-all: 218 passed, 0 failed of 218
  lever_census --check: 30,098 pin/asm sites, 30,098 marked !FAKE, 0 UNMARKED — OK
  audit_public: OK — 0 offenders among 11445 tracked paths
- snapshot row 10; the agent's body.c and mechanism.md kept in the pack as the reading behind the generator.
2026-09-10 00:39:14 -06:00
Drew T 7b2200edad phase-36: the tail pass g6 + g6b (47 + 63 of 400 small classes; 186/191 siblings propagated), R22 218/218; 30,806 → 30,358 sites; --try (a candidate scored without a tree write), delever_pack.py (the 57 T7 packs + PROMPT.md), --restore refuses an empty snapshot; the checkpoint: T7 as one agent at a time, approved, starts in the fresh session 2026-09-09 23:32:57 -06:00
Drew T 2f3ce92a15 phase-36: rung G run g5 — the head re-drawn wide: 5 of 70 (small classes, 62 bodies), R22 218/218; 30,892 → 30,806 sites; the wide-search lever is spent on the big classes (112,216 compiles); R14 rewrites prototypes, R8 names repeated operands/groups, R12 splits multi-declarator lines; C/D-only bodies are done and not drawn, the seed keeps class C/D sites 2026-09-09 22:07:17 -06:00
Drew T 1ec67f6677 phase-36: rung G run g4s — func_8016E9EC's shape closed in three classes (133 bodies, R22 218/218; 31,025 → 30,892 sites); generators R12 widths (u8/short/int), R14 parameter width, R8 shared base, R10 cast alias; the bank and propagation in process (apply_body_core); the per-tag scratch-object race fixed; propagate's empty-list return 2026-09-09 20:18:43 -06:00
Drew T 068781ae0b phase-36: rung G run g3 — 13 of 64 classes closed (R12 width ×5, R7 ×3, R9 ×3, R10 ×2 — lane B's width and parameter moves half the closes), 1,516 bodies banked + propagated 1,503/1,503, R22 218/218; 33,031 → 31,025 sites; the S101 checkpoint block written 2026-09-09 19:55:37 -06:00
Drew T 5ae0b5cebd phase-36: rung G run g2 — func_80142EC0 closed (do-while + swap, 132 bodies banked, propagated 131/131), R22 218/218; 33,295 → 33,031 sites; the wider beam with R10/R12/R13/R8-cse moved nine of fifteen past g1; cookbook §455; lane B's constant-swap and do-while claims verified on bytes (the ledger in residual_moves.md) 2026-09-09 18:51:01 -06:00
Drew T a4cbe0d5a3 phase-36: rung G run g1 — 1 of 16 exemplars (func_801424E4, the count-changing body rung D left at 2) closed by three composed moves, 132 bodies banked + propagated 131/131, R22 218/218; 33,427 → 33,295 sites; R5 skips constant operands (lane B's fold claim verified on bytes); bottom-up order within a file 2026-09-09 18:22:01 -06:00
Drew T 7192ab9ab1 phase-36: the S100 checkpoint — the triage Drew approved, the compute-only guided-search engine (rung R is blind: it tests for IDENTICAL and throws the distance away), my recommendation on Fable's role, and the LoRA parked for the endgame 2026-09-09 16:19:17 -06:00
Drew T 72a9ab1129 phase-36: the free-bank sweep measured — rung R is replication, not discovery (0 of 300 at cap 40 AND at cap 400; the cap was never binding at ~57 candidates/body; the instrument cleared by hand) 2026-09-09 16:10:11 -06:00
Drew T 1c23550540 src(phase-36): T6 propagation p1 — the four classes rung D cracked, spread to 525 siblings (R22 218/218)
- delever --propagate: 132 + 130 + 131 + 132 siblings banked, 0 refused; each sibling's body is the exemplar's reshaped
  text with ITS OWN func_/D_ addresses (the class is "identical modulo addresses", so the two old bodies' tokens
  correspond one for one), judged on its own objects before it is kept
- the class key comes from the FIRST bank in a body's chain, not the last: a body that was reshaped and then tidied has
  two rows, and the later row's before-hash describes a text only that body ever had (func_80163EC8 found 0 siblings
  until this was fixed, then 132)
- R22 clean fleet: `check-all: 218 passed, 0 failed of 218`
- lever_census --check: 33,427 pin/asm sites, 33,427 marked, 0 UNMARKED — 664 sites gone this session (34,091 at S99's
  open); lever_progress snapshot "T6 p1"
2026-09-09 13:00:19 -06:00
Drew T a2da99b130 src(phase-36): T6 rung D banked — the four exemplars the permuter closed, tidied and byte-judged (R22 218/218)
- delever_permute --bank: 4 winners applied through delever --apply-body, each IDENTICAL on its own object; the winner is
  now TIDIED first (pycparser reprints a body it parsed: two-space indent and a corpse `;` where a statement was inlined
  away) and the tidy is judged like any other candidate, so the source keeps the tree's shape; parenthesisation and brace
  style are deliberately left to the formatting phase, over the whole tree at once
- a slip, named: --bank re-applied a permuter body over the ONE-LINE version rung R had already banked for
  func_80135D20; the clean text was restored through the oracle (label d1fix) and --bank now skips any body the ledger
  already calls LEVER-FREE
- --recipes is killable now: the oracle writes the candidate into the tree to compile it, so the original goes into
  inflight.json first (P35's rule: a tool restores from its own snapshot) — a killed run had left a candidate in src/
- rung R's R6 generalised from "assigned once, read once" to "dead after one read" (the lever rung D actually found:
  uVar5 is assigned in two branches and only one was inlined); it still does not reproduce that class's win, which is
  recorded as an open item rather than papered over
- lever_census: 33,953 sites (was 33,957), 0 UNMARKED; lever_progress snapshot "T6 d1"; R22 218 passed, 0 failed of 218
2026-09-09 12:21:42 -06:00
Drew T 8fac96651f docs(phase-36): the lever series as a tracked deliverable — docs/levers.md + tools/lever_progress.py (Drew's directive)
The pin/hint removal's COUNT OVER TIME is a deliverable in its own right: the post-100% chart, the story's spine, a wiki
page, and the day-one rule the decomp-architect kit should carry. It is only ever counted by the phase that removes it, so
it has to be captured while the work happens — a census is a moment.

- docs/levers.md: the taxonomy (A pins · B1-B4 barriers/launders/keep-alives/hand-placed instructions · B5 GTE, not a
  lever · C volatile · D bare register · E asm-label aliases · F builtins · G attributes); a GENERATED §2; how the levers
  got in phase by phase (P18's pin toolkit took the wave close-rate 33% -> 56% -> 90%; the family engine then copied every
  lever across up to 134 overlays, which is why 1,758 distinct bodies are 12,578); the ladder with each rung's measured
  yield; §5 the prevent-vs-defer argument; §6 what the wiki, the kit and the story each take.
- tools/lever_progress.py: --snapshot appends a milestone row (the census's totals by class + HEAD) to
  docs/lever-progress.tsv and re-renders the document; the campaign table is derived from the de-lever ledger on every
  render and scored as state TRANSITIONS, so the rung that FINISHES a body gets the credit (counting first-rows-only
  reported rung R's 134-body batch as zero); --check refuses a series that is not this tree's.
- the numbers, generated: 21,061 sites removed or rewritten across 17,119 bodies against 33,957 still standing — 38% of
  the class A/B population came off with no understanding at all, which is the evidence behind §5's rule:
  BAN THE SILENCE, NOT THE LEVER (a lever is allowed and is a marked, ledgered, published debt from the first bank, with a
  one-compile bank-time trial; never block the byte gate on it).
- Reference-index row (doc_links OK), SETUP row, tool dictionary row, CURRENT_PHASE entry for the story.
2026-09-09 12:10:24 -06:00