The t5s/t5t distill returned three 'new lever' claims and the verifier REFUTED two as rediscoveries:
* func_8017E044's zero-byte __asm__ against reorg's delay-slot steal IS §5a/§34 (+§164-33/§164-36),
already indexed at cookbook-index.md:22;
* func_8017C014's ternary-vs-if-chain LICM effect is the loop.c movable gate (REG_N_SETS==1)
already documented for a recomputed CONSTANT — here firing on a computed loop-invariant EXPR.
Only func_8017EB30's survived, as an ADDENDUM to §165-03 — and the verifier proved it by reading the
target .s itself: the same 279-ins template, same //, as §165-03's byte-proven sibling
func_8017F2D4 in the adjacent overlay. Filed with its UNPROVEN label intact (that draft did not pass
the whole-binary gate — R14/G3).
THE REAL FINDING is the rediscovery rate, so §5a gains a FINDABILITY addendum: the law was there and
the agent could not find it, because the index states the symptom as 'gcc stole an instruction into a
branch delay slot that the target leaves as nop' and what the agent actually SAW was LENGTH-DRIFT/1
at closeness 45, an extra j absent from the target, and a DUPLICATED store — the nop never appeared
in its diff at all. The addendum indexes those three alternate tells. Same shape as S64's §41
addendum: the knowledge base's gap is retrieval, not content.
Index 921 sections, green.
recover_integration's macro-externs stage rewrote a draft's callee extern to the FLEET macro's
signature and then gated only the rewrite. func_ADDR names are per-address, not per-function, so
another overlay's 'extern void func_8017C338(void)' replaced this overlay's correct 4-arg decl and
manufactured the CC1-FAIL it reported as the draft's failure. The untouched draft banks
byte-identical (ov_SC03_012:func_8017BEBC, 246 ins, banked in the previous commit).
reconcile_and_gate(draft_rewrite=) now gates raw (pass 1a) then rewrites only what raw refused
(pass 1b), records the winning variant per fn, and re-gates that variant in pass 2.
harvest_verify.classify_fail kept the 'note:' half of a benign warning pair and labelled a built
draft CC1-FAIL with it; notes now drop with their warnings. Negative-controlled over 5 diagnostic
shapes — only warning+note-only changed (to the honest no-diagnostic label). R39/R57/R32.
Cookbook 920 -> 921 sections, index green.
42-case first run: 39 were one uncompilable TU (ov_SC04_018_jr_8017AE2C.c), not draft defects —
the resolver's 'undeclared' classification needs a TU-alone compile probe first (open follow-up).
R30/R31 capture while hot: the resolver pivot (63 zero-token banks of 245 staged of 424 judged of
1,352 nominated), the RED-fleet finding (15/214 baseline-RED refusing 174/182 doubly-verified
drafts), the three byte-proven repairs so far, and rule candidates R56–R58.
frontier-analysis-s60 §4 measured that ~571 open functions had FINISHED drafting (closeness-0 backlog
rows / reloc shape-MATCH rejects) and were being re-drafted wave after wave. tools/integration_resolver.py
treats those ledgers as an index: still-open? -> rtu_match at the real split TU (CC1: the gate ladder's
draft-side transforms, one retry) -> reloc_identity as the disagreeing oracle (rtu masks reloc fields)
-> aprop_symfix on MISMATCH/shape-MATCH -> stage -> sweep_parallel (whole-binary SHA, sole arbiter)
-> commit at once (R42). Refuses main by name (gate_main owns it), //@EDIT drafts, dirty trees, collapsed
registries; every drop is counted (R32); a negative control over recently-banked functions must pass
N/N before any verdict is trusted (R35/R39 — its first form picked carve moves as banks, 9/12 FAIL,
and was fixed before a single stock verdict was read). Ledger .run/resolver/verdicts.jsonl keyed by
(binary, fn, draft-sha, split-TU-sha) so unchanged rejects are never re-judged.
First pass (commit:2991): 1,352 nominated -> 901 already banked, 27 main -> 424 judged in 41 s ->
245 staged (57.8%; 242 raw, 3 via transforms) -> 63 banked (net INCLUDE_ASM delta; that commit's
subject says 72 = gross incl. 9 carve moves), 182 gate-refused, zero model tokens, ~10 min total.
Lane wrapper tools/lanes/resolver_lane.sh (holds .run/auto/draw.lock for judge+gate: rtu reads the
TUs a gate splices into).
The audit's headline, measured: THE WALL IS AN INTEGRATION WALL, NOT A CODEGEN WALL. Of the 292
functions the gate has refused 6+ times, 178 (61%) have ALREADY produced a closeness-0 draft —
match_one byte-equality, whole-binary gate rejection. The blocker is symbols/decls/TU plumbing,
and the fleet keeps re-drafting them: 10,049 reject rows over 574 distinct functions. Highest-EV
build is a zero-token integration-resolver lane, not more drafting.
CORRECTIONS TO MY OWN NUMBERS, verified against the tree before accepting:
* siblings are 1,334 behind 480 multi-member groups, NOT ~3,900. 1,292 groups are SINGLETONS
carrying 57% of open instruction mass. I conflated the never-drafted stub count with the sibling
count and overstated remap leverage ~3x, in this checkpoint and repeatedly in conversation.
* 'everything drawable is gen6+' holds only for the collapsed wave-eligible view; whole-pool
generation is 53% gen0/1, 25% gen6+, and only 292 fns are 6+ GATE-refused.
* '30-67 min gates at 8% CPU' conflated wall_min (includes drafting/queue) with gate wall (12-31
min healthy). Gate cost is proportional to FAILURES, not drafts: ~3 whole-binary builds per
failing draft, so banks/gate-min fell 17.5 -> 0.10 as conversion fell.
* the 5,388 closeness<=2 rows de-dupe to ~543 open functions; my own 19:40 re-measure found 290
still open, down from its 470 — the re-gate and grinder are draining that pool now.
* campaign_status's 'banked today' undercounts: the stub invariant says ~2,644 net, because the
A-prop lane's 357 rode in a chore commit its regex cannot see.
One documented counterexample to 'model quality is not a bottleneck': func_80181714, where
ox-alpha plateaued at closeness 4 while Opus/GLM/DeepSeek each reached reloc-verified MATCH —
argues for a small escalation tier AFTER the resolver drains the fake walls.
Taken on trust and flagged as such: the A-prop residual split (169 STRUCT / 121 no-seed-decl /
73 IMM / 12 void) — the refusal mechanisms exist in aprop_autodraft.py but no file carries those
counts; re-derive before building the decl-inference tool.
Five reviewers on disjoint wave groups (D1 dd/de/df · D2 dg-dm · D3 cg-cm · D4 cn-cw ·
D5 cx-dt): 859 COVERED · 46 ADDENDUM · 9 NEW · 289 REJECT. Index now 888 sections.
§283 the 46 sharpenings, one block per target section
§284 combine can reassociate two sequential bitwise-AND masks against the PRE-mask value;
an asm fence at the mask's definition point stops it
§285 pre-initializing a variable with a shared constant BEFORE a branch makes both arms of
the following if/else destructively reuse one register
§286 fold a statement's side effect into a comma-expression in an argument position to
place its RTL relative to a call's own delay slot
§287 a stack-frame hole below two address-taken aggregate locals is a LEADING PAD MEMBER of
one combined struct, not separate locals
§288 a register pin declared UNINITIALIZED and assigned only at its late sole use still
forces the fixed register's save/restore
§289 an array local's decayed base keeps EVERY element's store alive under DSE, though only
one pointer value escapes
§290 one strength-reduced giv can drive stores to several distinct relocatable symbols,
each keeping its own %hi/%lo anchor
§291 the delay-slot false-value: a conditional branch's zero arm must be a fall-through
adjacent block ending in an explicit goto
§292 declaring a symbol upstream of an already-banked sibling that relies on its implicit
(K&R) declaration silently reprototypes the sibling's call site
VERIFICATION CAUGHT SIX BAD CLAIMS, recorded in §283 as refuted rather than laundered in:
three independent "the harvester leaked an unbanked NEAR into a banked-only harvest" reports
(all three functions are genuinely banked per corpus.stubs — the notes predate their gate and
read as harvester bugs hours later); a "match_one resolves targets by bare symbol name" claim
(it resolves an explicit path, and api_draft always passes it — the real hazard is its
resident-defaulting --asm-subdir, hardened separately in commit:2917); and two idiom claims
whose mechanism is absent from the banked code. §284's fence was described as NON-volatile
and the banked code uses `__asm__ volatile` — corrected in the text, since that is a detail
readers copy verbatim.
THE STRONGEST SIGNAL IS NOT A SECTION: eight cards across four waves independently
re-derived that the whole-object gate needs every sibling matched. It is implicit in the
corpus and has never been stated as its own law. Recorded in §283 as the batch's clearest
missing-section signal.
PROCESS, for the next batch: forked sub-reviewers exceeded their brief in three of five
groups — one re-derived five waves it was not assigned and self-merged over the shared output
path, one silently dropped 11 rows including a whole function, one produced nothing. Each
parent caught its own fork. Tell forks not to spawn forks (they infer it from the parent's
inherited context) and give each a private output path.
34 candidates: 13 COVERED · 8 ADDENDUM · 4 NEW · 9 REJECT.
§278 the 8 sharpenings (§17, §20, §74, §162p, §164-56, §172b-4, §237, §265)
§279 a do/while (p < end) under an entry guard — the GUARD decides the compare
§280 the cursor's declared type picks sltu vs slt: a `T*` bound test is unsigned by
C rule, an integer cursor is signed — confirmed twice in one wave by unrelated
functions, which is why it generalizes to the corpus's scan-loop residuals
§281 group copy-then-RMW by OPERATION KIND, not field by field; sched1 does the
interleaving. §213 explicitly disclaimed this shared-pseudo case — a named gap now filled
§282 gcc's own loop reversal places the reversed counter's init AFTER the hoisted
movables, a position no hand-written down-count loop can reach — resolves a class of
"prologue order" residuals that looked unfixable from the C side
VERIFICATION, both directions (R14/G3). Two reviewer claims were REFUTED at byte-check and
recorded as refuted rather than laundered in: func_800CAE74's note described a "parameter
reassignment" idiom absent from the banked C (the real law became §280), and func_800CBCD4's
named the wrong register ($v1 where the bytes use $v0). I re-verified §280 independently at
merge: the target carries one `slt` and zero `sltu`, and the banked C drives the bound test
with a plain s32 cursor beside a separate s32* — the direction the law predicts.
Section titles were rewritten at merge: the reviewer put each law in the body and left the
heading as "(func_X, ov_Y)", which is unfindable. A section is written to be GREPPED, so the
title states the law.
Three harness suspicions recorded in §278, NOT acted on — func_8017F39C suspects a
binary-registration mixup with a same-named function in ov_SC01_009, which is a gate-side
question, not a drafting one.
Index: 824 sections. Distill state updated, cf marker consumed; the lane is free to raise the
next batch.
The ore that piled up behind a stale READY marker for 10.5 h (waves be..ce). Three Sonnet
reviewers on disjoint wave groups read all 315 harvested notes against the corpus:
255 COVERED · 21 ADDENDUM · 3 NEW · 26 REJECT
255 already-covered is the flywheel working, not waste — §193-§273 are earlier rounds of
this same cycle, so a note restating a law we own is the corpus doing its job.
§274 the 21 sharpenings, one block per target section (§8, §20, §82, §134, §164-51,
§164-64, §172a, §172b-1, §172b-4, §176-F5, §179-C, §179-D, §211, §219+§1-I5,
§224, §225, §225/§256, §226, §229, §244, §136d-1)
§275 THE LEFTOVER-REGISTER READ — an entry block that consumes $v0/$v1 with no earlier
write in the function is reading the CALLER's return value; reproduce with an
unassigned `register s32 v __asm__("$2")`, and stop hunting for a dropped call
§276 MIXED ADDRESS-EXPRESSION SPELLING as a CSE-unification dial — spell one occurrence
of a repeated symbol as offset arithmetic on its neighbour ((&D_X)[1]) and cse
cannot unify them; found twice, independently, on the same function
§277 RETURN-TAIL C SPELLING picks the delay-slot-fill vs trailing-move topology
VERIFIED AT MERGE, not taken on trust (R14/G3): the leftover-register read, the CSE-defeat
spelling, the compound-rounding pair (live in ov_SC03_095), and func_801846F0's delay-slot
`addu $v0,$zero,$zero`. Two reviewer claims did NOT survive and are corrected in place:
§275's law was stated as "no call anywhere in the body" when the function has five jal's —
what makes it true is that no write to the register PRECEDES the read; and a claimed
harness defect (func_800CE004 "will not bank") is false, it has a real body at
src/md_MAIN_044/md_MAIN_044.c:443 and corpus.stubs does not list it as open.
B and C reached the same CSE lever from different waves and the §1-I5 / §219 rounding law
arrived twice on three overlays — both unified into one entry rather than duplicated.
Index regenerated: 806 sections. The lane immediately raised its next batch (cf, 34
candidates), which is the proof it is unblocked.
.run/maintenance.sh (what runs) and tools/lanes/maintenance.sh (a pre-S59 copy) had
diverged. The 150->50 threshold tune landed on the stale copy and was then copied over
the live one, silently reverting five S59 fixes:
* the R47 shape filter (staging fell back to status=='AGREE' alone — the exact defect
that staged 82 hopeless drafts every 45 minutes)
* the R48 (binary, fn) keying (bare-fn keys collide across overlays)
* reloc --fix MISMATCH auto-repair (measured 4/4 repaired to AGREE)
* rtu_second_chance (re-judges standalone COMPILE-FAILs against the real TU)
* fix_tu_ret_decls (the return-type half of the stale-decl wall)
Rebuilt from the S59 lineage with the 150->50 threshold and the periodic fleet R22
re-applied, both paths now byte-identical, `bash -n` clean, and the two-path hazard
documented in the header so the next edit cannot repeat it.
Also: relaunch_drafter_shell.sh 30s -> 5s ready-marker poll; regenerated backlog and
fleet progress artifacts.
docs/tool-designs/aprop-lane-s59.md: baseline (117 staged / 0 banked = 82
shape-DIFF + 19 standalone-fail + 16 near-0, none invisible), the defect
classes with byte-proofs, the fixed pipeline's end-to-end numbers (64+ banked,
zero tokens), the near-miss taxonomy (11 IMM tier-2, 8 wrong-family), the
ceiling with every refusal named and sized, and the two pre-existing RED
binaries the scoped R22 surfaced (SC07_010 fixed green; SC07_002 named for the
jtbl owner).
Cookbook: §270 the four-verdict law (instructions/symbols/TU/whole-binary —
stage on fewer and burn a build per missing layer forever), §271 ordinal
candidate pairing, §272 K&R the definition, §273 the wrong-oracle law.
maintenance.sh now runs the full recovered pipeline unattended: shape-gated
(binary,fn)-keyed staging, reloc --fix repair+recheck, rtu second chance,
fix_tu_ret_decls on fresh near-0 rejects.
Drew T