aprop_autodraft over regenerated A-prop cards (582 mechanical drafts), reloc_identity
pre-filter (509/582 AGREE), sweep_parallel gate across 107 binaries in 54m35s.
Result: 390 banked of 511 gated (76.3%).
This lane was invisible until the atlas KeyError fix earlier this session: member_lever
emitted the confidence value 'aprop-pure' that _CONF_RANK never contained, so atlas.py
died on the first group carrying such a vote and could not produce an atlas at all.
With it fixed the remap lever shows 235 groups / 812 instances / 46,240 instructions.
DeepSeek card-fueled drafts from .run/bakeoff/ds-fuel{A,B}. reloc_identity AGREE 10/10
pre-gate; whole-binary gate banked 9/10 (func_8017F468 @ ov_SC02_021 held back).
Parallel gate farm (tools/sweep_parallel.py -j 8) instead of the serial gate_lane:
7 binaries in 53s vs ~25min for the 19-binary serial sub-50 run.
An external-model bake-off, not a banking session. Nothing was banked; that is
the next session's first task.
FINDINGS
- CARD FUEL is the biggest lever, bigger than model choice: the same 10 cards
went 4/10 -> 9/10 when seed_ref/tu_ref/decl_prior were injected. The
"60-instruction ceiling" was an artifact of withholding fuel.
- Sub-50 is near-free: 19/19 verified MATCH at $0.007/function, blind.
7,724 sub-50 open functions = 73.5% of the remaining set.
- A free model (stealth/ox-alpha) cracked a 611-ins function and a jtbl
exemplar, and distilled §206 — whose two negative results were
independently byte-confirmed before banking.
- §206 transfers WITHIN a family (40 turns -> 11) but NOT across (56 turns,
0 compiles). jtbl costs ~40 turns of learning per family, not per class.
TOOL FIXES (all negative-controlled)
- family_remap.gather_externs: took the first ALPHABETICAL extern across the
overlay's TUs, carrying two types swapped (sh/lh vs lbu/sb). Now prefers
the extracted unit's own file. Blocked a 4-member/2,444-ins family.
- atlas.member_lever: aprop_card was loaded and never read while a bare
ledger DIFF forced needs-autopsy. PURE now outranks it — rescues 32
members / 11 families / 3,810 ins.
- decl_prior._ASM_SYM: the %hi/%lo arm had never fired (0 of 1,210 over four
waves). jal 306->306 zero regressions, data 0->299.
- api_agent.py (new): --cards, --brief, --max-cost, nudge loop, 429
attribution + backoff, transport retry, non-fatal tool faults, and a
repeated-call guard.
RULES PROPOSED: R40 (exonerate the instrument before attributing a failure to
its subject — seven instances this session) and R41 (a cost/rate/yield number
ships with its denominator — I quoted $0.30 against a $6.31 bill).
Wave AA: 69 cards / 6,539 ins / 8 gate groups, 33 siblings, snapshotted 69/69.
All 69 passed the S46 validity gate pre-draft — the first wave drawn through it
since it was wired into build_wave_atlas, and the honest population negative
control for that gate (zero false refusals; a poisoned card is refused
OUT-OF-RANGE).
decl_prior now contributes 165 DATA rows to the cards (0 on every prior wave,
the §204-E fix). The 49 uncopyable pointer-to-function spellings are marked
`fleet_note` rather than dropped: the consensus is real information, the
rendering is not valid C. NOT fixed at the source — gate_main.typesig is the
banking driver's conflict oracle, so the safe fix is a display-only
pretty-printer in decl_prior, and no index rebuild is needed since the tuple is
what the index stores.
Audit after "did you update tooling for those findings" found three gaps
beyond the four committed fixes:
- R21: docs/SETUP.md had no record of any of it. Adds the "four flow traps"
table — each trap, its measured cost, and where it is now caught.
- family_sweep --only had no coverage assertion, so the 3-vs-50 mis-scope
could recur silently. It now resolves member addrs to their family, always
prints the coverage line, and refuses when it resolves to zero families.
- pregate_check modelled the banking driver's typedef strip but never checked
the consequence. Adds [DROP-RISK] §203 USE-BEFORE-TYPEDEF. R39 NC: flags
the known-bad splice, 0 false positives on the post-hoist file and all 7
other wave-Z TUs (first draft read a typedef named in its own comment).
Also corrects §203 and the phase log: the text that banked was the RENAMED
variant, because gate_stage's backlog.save_draft() overwrote the original on
the failed attempt. Bytes are correct (R22 213/213); the claim "draft
byte-unchanged" was not.
Wave Z: 74/75 MATCH, 72 banked first gate, 2 recovered for zero agent tokens
(§203 address-order typedef hoist; §202 alias on a DEFINITION for the §183.3
DEF-side return wall). Sibling sweep re-scoped after --only was keyed on the
atlas gid rather than family_hseq's exemplar: 3 -> 50 banked.
Harvest: 82 gap reports -> 5 laws, 16 rejected, 30 already-covered; the
adversarial verifier killed 7 of 12 claims. §204 written (510 lines).
Tooling, all negative-controlled:
- the S46 validity gate was off the path for waves T-Z; wired into
build_wave_atlas where cards are born, with the PRE-DRAFT-ONLY constraint
documented (it condemns banked work if run later)
- wave_snapshot honors the card's `sub` (9/9 legacy byte-identical, 66/66
split-TU recovered)
- §204-E: decl_prior's %hi/%lo arm had never fired (jal 306->306 zero
regressions, data 0->299)
Refreshed rather than appended: the previous checkpoint (commit:2542) was outrun by the §201-A fix,
wave Z's redraw and wave Y's harvest, and a checkpoint the tree has moved past is worse than none
because it is believed. Written for a session that has none of this context: what banked, the seven
results that outlive the count, every tool shipped, the eight-step wave-closing sequence, the exact
invocation that fires the staged wave Z, the four known-open near-misses with their attributions,
and the transient-failure recovery that worked five times tonight.
Wave-metrics gains a single six-wave table: 405 drafted, 405 banked or recovered.
Wave Y's harvest found a defect in the card field shipped EARLIER THE SAME SESSION (§196). Overlay
functions are named by VRAM address and 134 overlays load at the same window, so build()'s bare
defs[name] counter mixed N unrelated functions -- and §196 ranked that row ABOVE the destination TU.
Measured over the tree: 3,911 of 9,861 symbols with a definition are defined in >1 binary; 1,219
disagree on ARITY, 1,204 of them in the overlay window; 818 of the disagreements were a top-two TIE
that Counter.most_common broke by sorted-file order, so the lowest-numbered defining overlay
silently won. On wave Y's five binaries, 26 of 65 overlay-window DEF rows (40%) named another
overlay's function. Byte-proven cost: applying one row's arity to func_8017E83C took it from
MATCH (114 ins) to 113 ins / 83 mismatched.
Fix: defs are keyed by BINARY; a DEF row is emitted only from the target's own binary for
overlay-window symbols, and otherwise withheld with a stated reason ('N other binaries define this
address; none is yours') rather than silently omitted. Resident/shared/main symbols are fleet-unique
and were always correct (0 of 43 wrong). build_wave_atlas passes the target binary through.
Wave Z was ALREADY STAGED with 24 poisoned rows across its 292; redrawn with the fixed tool -> 0
poisoned, 24 withheld with a reason. This is the fourth same-session self-correction (§194-E ->
§193-A, §199-A -> §189-A, §197-A -> §136-9, §201-A -> §196), and the first one caught before the
bad data reached agents.
Caught by Drew: the tool was committed and nothing called it — not the harvest prompt, not the
memory, not SETUP.md. A tool nobody invokes is the same defect this session keeps finding in the
CARDS (§193-A, §194-E, §196: the answer was already computed and nothing carried it), wearing
tooling clothes.
Now: step 0 of the harvest reader prompt runs it; docs/SETUP.md carries a row with the measured
threshold rationale (R21); the wave-closing memory names it in step 6. All three restate the same
caveat because it is the part that gets forgotten — a candidate is a STARTING POINT, and an empty
candidate list is NOT evidence of novelty, since dumb term overlap misses paraphrase entirely.
Measured the top-candidate score distribution on wave Y's 67 gaps: min 0.009 / p50 0.08 / p90 0.26 /
max 0.53. Hand-checking the low half showed generic co-occurrence -- 'delay slot' matching every
section that mentions a delay slot -- not real answers. Emitting those is worse than emitting
nothing: an empty list costs a reader nothing, a plausible-but-wrong section costs them a read. The
tool now reports 14 confident candidates instead of 51 mostly-noise ones.
Drew T