tools/journal_notes.py mines the agent journals per (binary, fn) and appends a PAST ATTEMPTS section to the pack; claude_wave_packs.py calls it automatically, so it is the default rather than a step to remember. Idempotent, and R48-safe (a note stamped with a different binary is never served — §238 homonyms). Measured before adopting (S71 wave 1, 50 one-agent workflows over the 210-function real frontier where every target had already refused an earlier wave): * 38/39 MATCH at closeness 0 (97.4%) vs S70's 124/131 (94.7%) on an EASIER pool * 29/39 agents cite a prior attempt as what they used * 4/39 banked by RECOVERING a body that already matched, from a path a note named * 11/39 matched on the first compile The two costs it removes are re-testing a measured-inert lever (§406 lists twelve, §407 fifteen, §410 four — each paid for by an agent and never seen again) and re-deriving a body that already exists on disk. Also: jr_isolate_all places file-local `static` definitions with the region that uses them instead of refusing the whole file. A `static inline` helper (§82.1) has no address by construction, which is not a defect; the R32 guard was refusing these and blocking the isolate on 4 of the 6 overlays whose CARVE-REFUSED functions it is the named remedy for. Two regions using one static is still a hard refusal (duplicating a used static is a byte change, R43). docs: cookbook §411, wave-playbook step 3b, accelerators entry.
25 KiB
Wave playbook — running a Claude-agent matching wave, start to finish
Status: CURRENT (P31 S67, 2026-08-31). This is the pipeline in use today.
docs/automation-runbook.md describes the retired OpenRouter / ox-alpha campaign — its section 2
is titled "The drafting toolchain (OpenRouter)" and its lanes (drafter/gater/maintenance/
stallguard) are all DEAD by choice. Do not follow it for a Claude wave.
Every step below carries the measured failure that justifies it. That is the point of the document: the sequence is easy to guess, the guards are not, and each guard exists because something specific went wrong and cost tokens or a red binary.
0. Preconditions
git status --porcelain -- src config include # MUST be empty
make check-all # or trust the last full R22
A gate that starts on a dirty tree cannot tell your edits from its own. ghidra/ churn in
git status is MCP noise and is never committed.
1. Draw — and exclude what cannot bank (R45)
python3 tools/draw_waves.py --prefix .run/<name>_ --waves 1 --per-wave <N> \
--exclude "$(cat .run/S67_exclude2.txt)"
python3 tools/draw_waves.py --only-main --prefix .run/<name>m_ --waves 1 --per-wave <M> --exclude ...
--prefixIS A RELATIVE PATH.--prefix s67owrites./s67o1/into the repo root, not.run/. Always pass.run/<name>_.- The exclude list is not optional. It carries two populations that no model can bank:
- 96 jtbl functions whose carve plan
build_carveREFUSES (non-contiguous same-subseg.rodata). Cookbook §322. Before the S67 probe fix these all read "carveable". - the toolchain walls (
.run/S67_walls.txt): §188 epilogue functions thatoracle_reorder.pyproves byte-correct-but-unemittable, the §332 maspsxla-in-delay-slot set, and SDK-object addresses that belong topsyq_integrate.py. Measured: a main wave spent 4 of 7 slots proving things already proven (§332a).
- 96 jtbl functions whose carve plan
- Main draws refuse LINKED subsegs automatically — those stubs are dead text and a draft there gates GREEN while wrong.
1b. THE WALLS LEDGER IS ALWAYS INCOMPLETE, AND THAT COSTS A FULL AGENT RUN EACH TIME
.run/S6*_walls.txt lists functions the pinned triple cannot emit at all — mostly §177/§188's
-O1-vs-O2 epilogue (jr $ra with addiu $sp in its delay slot), which oracle_reorder.py proves
byte-correct-but-unemittable. Excluding them at draw time is in step 1 for a reason.
But a wall nobody has met yet is invisible to that filter, so each new one is discovered by
PAYING an agent to hit it. Measured twice in S68, both on main:
| function | what it cost | outcome |
|---|---|---|
func_8005E228 |
a full sonnet run | wall found, then banked the §265 verbatim-asm way |
func_8005F0C8 |
289k tokens | drafted to closeness 36, residual confirmed §188 by the oracle |
Neither was on any list beforehand, and neither is a model failure — an agent handed a wall always returns a NEAR with an unexplainable tail, which is indistinguishable from a hard function.
HALF OF THIS IS NOW BUILT — USE IT. tools/wall_sweep.py enumerates the §332 class (a %lo
in a delay slot, i.e. the second half of an assembler macro gcc emits as ONE atomic insn, so C can
never put it there):
python3 tools/wall_sweep.py # report, with the branch/slot pair for each hit
python3 tools/wall_sweep.py --emit-exclude # binary:fn lines, straight into draw_waves --exclude
Current answer: 10 functions, 1,027 instructions over 1,378 open-stub .s files. §332 had said
"6 fleet-wide" and named two — a count without an enumeration cannot drive a filter, which is
why the draw kept spending agents on them.
It repaid itself within minutes of existing: main/func_8005D734 was in the list AND had just been
escalated to Fable at closeness 8; its sweep site was exactly the residual the drafting agent
described, so that escalation could never have succeeded. Filtering the live queue then dropped two
more (func_8005D9C4 133 ins, func_8005F450 159 ins) before they were ever drafted.
STILL NOT BUILT: the same treatment for §188's epilogue shape. The detector exists inside
oracle_reorder.py and has never been run as a sweep. Until it is, treat "NEAR with an
epilogue-shaped tail" as a walls candidate and CHECK IT WITH THE ORACLE before escalating — an
escalation cannot beat the toolchain, so that spend is guaranteed waste.
2. Cards — and make sure the twin is on them
python3 tools/t5_cards.py --wave .run/<wave>
Check the printed seed_ref N/M line. seed_ref is the already-banked body that matches this
target, joined on the corpus signature hashes (tools/seed_ref.py).
The 102k-token lesson.
t5_cardsused to skipseed_refand the pack then asserted "no banked twin — derive from the .s", which its docstring called TRUE. It was true of the CARD and false of the WORLD. An opus agent spent 102,193 tokens re-derivingov_SC03_107:func_8013DD68, whose body is banked verbatim at the same address inov_MAIN_012. Fleet-wide, 87 open stubs have a banked twin and 41 sit intwin_sweep's refusal ledger, where neither tool could see them. Amechanical_remap_refusedflag now tells the agent: copy the BODY, expect a declaration blocker.
2a. RUN seed_ref --near BEFORE BELIEVING ANY "NO TWIN" VERDICT (S69)
.venv/bin/python tools/seed_ref.py --near --max-d 25 --json .run/<wave>/near.json
The exact-hash tier finds 22 of 352 reachable open stubs; the near band finds 75 of 352 (21%) —
3.4x. h_norm is blind to indexed-global relocs (§389), so true reloc-only twins of ALREADY-BANKED
bodies hash differently and read as singletons. A RELOC-ONLY row is mechanical: family_remap the
banked exemplar onto the open address, then gate — 8 of 10 banked at ~0 agent tokens on first use,
one 94-ins exemplar serving five open copies. Never send a RELOC-ONLY row to a drafting agent.
2a-2. THE TWIN LADDER — take the CHEAPEST tier available, never the closest number (S69)
Distance is a FILTER, not the ranking key: a deletion is free and a substitution is thought (§390). Work down this ladder and stop at the first tier that has a row; only widen when the tier above is empty. We never "go straight to d25" — widening only lets tiers 2-3 SEE candidates that a d=0-only tool called singletons.
| tier | detector | cost | measured S69 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 exact twin (d=0) | seed_ref hash |
free — copy the body verbatim | 22 rows |
| 2 RELOC-ONLY (any d) | seed_ref --near + family_remap.classify_member |
mechanical — remap, gate | 31 rows, 8 banked, ~0 tokens |
| 3 CONTAINED (± whole block) | seed_ref --contained |
near-mechanical — delete/add statements | 9 usable, 1 banked |
| 4 true cousin (few substitutions) | --near, ratio r = d/min(nins) <= 0.27 |
seeded crack — a cheap agent holding the twin's C | 13 rows |
| 5 no match | — | cold draft, full price | 277 of 352 |
Filter lookalikes before handing anything to an agent. At r >= ~0.37 the "twin" is two
different functions sharing boilerplate — 17 of 30 NEAR-COUSIN rows were exactly that. A wrong twin
is worse than no twin, because the agent believes it.
And do not build more scanners. Three fleet-wide probes past RELOC-ONLY returned 0 new / 9 / 2 (§390). The scanner well is dry; the integration levers (§376/§378) out-earned it by an order of magnitude in the same session.
2a-3. AFTER EVERY EXEMPLAR BANK, RE-RUN THE TWIN SCAN BEFORE DRAFTING ITS SIBLINGS (S69)
An open-open cluster reports "no banked twin" for ALL members — correctly, because none is banked.
Bank one and every sibling may become a remap job. Measured S69: a reach-6 cluster's exemplar
cost 203k tokens to crack, then four siblings were drafted at ~60k each when seed_ref would have
returned the freshly-banked exemplar as their twin and family_remap would have banked them for ~0
(the agents' own diffs read "label-stripped .s diff is EMPTY" and "an EXACT clone"). One of them had
already burned 257k plateauing at permuter-class NEAR before the remap closed it.
crack ONE exemplar -> gate -> BANK -> re-run seed_ref/--near for the rest of the cluster
-> remap what now has a twin; draft only what does not
And never draft two members of the same cluster in parallel — if either cracks, the other is free, so the second agent is pure waste (§397).
2b. RUN neighbor_ref FOR EVERY CARD — the biggest measured cost lever in the wave
python3 tools/neighbor_ref.py --binary <bin> --fn <fn> --top 5
seed_ref (step 2) answers "is there a byte-identical twin?". This answers the weaker and far
more common question: "which already-MATCHED function should this agent READ first?"
The measurement, S68. Every one of the cheapest large matches came from an agent finding a matched neighbour; the expensive ones had none:
| function | ins | tokens | what unlocked it |
|---|---|---|---|
func_800D1254 |
555 | 72k | an -O0 sibling in the same binary |
func_800D12D0 |
657 | 122k | the -O0 sibling, FIRST COMPILE |
func_8018AD9C |
397 | 87k | a banked twin, §193-A one-shot |
func_8017BEBC |
753 | 177k | a near-twin IN THE SAME FILE |
main fns with no neighbour |
~80 | 200–350k | — |
That is a ~20× swing on the one variable the card controls.
The failure it exists to prevent: func_8017BEBC's card asserted "no banked twin" while a
matched 755-instruction near-twin sat 3,700 lines up in its own destination file, its header comment
listing the four levers the target needed. seed_ref joins on signature hashes and could not see it.
Three other S68 agents found their unlock the same way, unprompted — so this is a supplied habit now,
not an accidental one.
Read the ranking honestly: SAME-TU beats everything (same decl environment, same carve, and its
header usually records the levers). An opt-level mismatch is PENALISED, not ranked low — an -O2
example actively misleads an -O0 target (§116). And a neighbour is a worked example to read,
never a body to copy: §168 law 1 measured cousin-remap at 0/26.
3. Packs
python3 tools/claude_wave_packs.py .run/<wave>/targets.json .run/<wave> \
--cards .run/<wave>/cards.json
Positional args, not flags. The second arg is the WAVE dir, not <wave>/packs — the tool writes
out_dir/SYS.md + out_dir/packs/<fn>.md, which is exactly the layout the drafting prompt reads.
CORRECTED P31 S70 — the old form silently cost every agent its laws file. This step used to be documented as
... .run/<wave>/packsfollowed bymv .run/<wave>/packs/packs/*.md .run/<wave>/packs/. That put the packs one level too deep (hence the mv) and SYS.md at<wave>/packs/SYS.md, whileclaude_wave_draft.jstells every agent to read<wave>/SYS.md. So SYS.md did not exist where any agent looked, in every wave, and the drafting brief silently degraded to "the pack alone". Two S70 agents reported it verbatim ("NOTE: .run/S70y_1/SYS.md does not exist — worked from the pack alone"); the rest never mentioned it. Pass the wave dir and the mv disappears with the bug.
3b. PAST-ATTEMPT FUEL — automatic since S71, but CHECK ITS COVERAGE LINE
claude_wave_packs.py now ends by calling tools/journal_notes.py, which mines every agent journal
for notes about each target and appends PAST ATTEMPTS ON THIS EXACT FUNCTION to its pack. Read the
line it prints:
past-attempt notes: 16/27 target(s) have journal history; appended to 16 pack(s)
A 0/N on a wave drawn from the frontier is a DEFECT, not a fact — those functions have refused
waves before, so they have history. Check the journal glob in journal_notes.JOURNALS resolves
(~/.claude/projects/-home-musashi-bfm-decomp/*/subagents/workflows/*/journal.jsonl) before believing
it. Back-fill a wave built another way with tools/journal_notes.py --wave <dir> (idempotent).
Why it is worth a step of its own (§411). S71 wave 1, over the hardest 210-function frontier where every target had already refused a wave: 38/39 MATCH (97.4%) vs S70's 124/131 (94.7%) on an easier pool, 29/39 agents citing a prior attempt, and 4/39 banking by recovering a MATCHing body the notes told them was already on disk. The two costs it removes are re-testing a measured-inert lever and re-deriving a body that exists.
4. Validate — never hand-type a target
python3 tools/wave_args.py .run/<wave> # writes wf_args.json
Asserts the .s exists, sub matches its parent directory, the pack exists, and the target is
still open at draw time.
EVERY payload you launch comes from
wf_args.json. Never type one. In S67 I hand-wrote a single streaming refill and inventedfunc_80184F60— the second instruction of an already-matched function, and aD_data label in sibling overlays. 58k tokens to prove my typo wrong.wave_args.pyexists because of an earlier instance of exactly this.
4b. THE TRIAGE LADDER RUNS HERE (S69) — and again before any escalation
wave_args now calls triage_ladder.pre_classify and DROPS every target that is walled or parked,
printing each one (never a silent cap). Nothing extra to run at draw time; read what it dropped.
Before escalating a stuck draft to a better model, run the check that S68 did not have:
python3 tools/triage_ladder.py --escalate <binary>:<fn> # exit 2 = do not escalate
S68 escalated main/func_8005D734 to Fable at closeness 8. It is a §332 delay-slot wall — no model
can emit it under the pinned triple. escalate_fable.js now REFUSES any target that does not carry
triage:'DRAFT', so the check is structural rather than remembered.
The ladder never runs on a moving tree. It refuses while a gate or drafting lane is live, because
a merging gate makes the stub oracle wrong in both directions (§377). If it refuses, wait — do not
--force to save a minute.
And do not treat its INTEG-STANDALONE-MATCH / NOCOMPILE-UNDECLARED-* output as banks. That is
the §376 correction: standalone closeness 0 proves the BODY, not that the TU accepts the SIGNATURE.
Measured S69: 0 of 28 of that class banked raw — then 8 banked once the missing lever
existed. Run the full §378 chain, IN ORDER; each step only reveals the next, and stopping at step 1
is how the class read as dead for half a session:
tools/fix_arity_callers.py --binary B --funcs FN --any-proto --apply --journal J1 # `conflicting types'
tools/cast_self_callers.py --binary B --funcs FN --drafts D --apply --journal J2 # `too few arguments'
tools/cast_self_callers.py … --sync-decls # narrow-param: C89 forbids no-proto vs `void f(s16)'
<gate> # the byte-gate is the sole arbiter
tools/cast_self_callers.py --undo-journal J2 --keep <banked> # MANDATORY — see below
Or in one driver: recover_integration.py --binary B --stages arity,self-cast --max-tier fleet --r22.
THE UNDO IS NOT OPTIONAL. The casts go in BEFORE the gate, in preparation. A cast left behind for a draft that did not bank made
ov_SC07_000fail to COMPILE at HEAD, so every later gate verdict on that binary measured a broken baseline rather than a draft (found only because two drafting agents reported BASELINE-RED and I checked their claim). Run--undo-journal --keep <banked>after EVERY gate.
CORRECTED S69 — the callee variant is NOT the same chain. If the diagnostic names a DIFFERENT
symbol (conflicting types for func_8012AD44), that is a CALLEE and §378 does not transfer:
cast_self_callers cannot cast it (it reads the return type off the draft), so --any-proto runs
UNPROTECTED and changes argument conversion at every call site. Measured: 60 decls no-protoed,
binary RED, reverted. It banked main:func_80021D38 only because that callee had ONE decl.
Count the sites first; never no-proto a symbol whose call sites you are not also casting.
See §378b for the full decision table — there are FOUR variants and two of them break the chain.
Notably variant 3 (conflicting types, RETURN type only, decl already (), symbol ADDRESS-TAKEN)
is fixed by --sync-decls ALONE: both other levers no-op, and the sync is safe precisely because an
address-taken site has no arguments to convert.
5. Draft
tools/workflows/claude_wave_draft.js, args = {wave, targets}. One agent per target,
model = target.arm.
Two shapes, and streaming is preferred:
- Batch — N targets in one workflow. Simple, but it cannot gate until its slowest agent lands: measured 18 of 20 drafts idle while 2 stragglers ran.
- Streaming — one target per workflow, refill each slot on completion. Same concurrency, but
banking starts immediately.
claude_wave_draft.jswith a single target IS a one-agent workflow; no new script needed.
Streaming burns the 5-hour window faster (it removes the idle gaps), so slots are the budget dial. Model routing: ≤50 ins Sonnet · 51–120 Sonnet · >120 Opus. Never Haiku→Opus directly.
6. Gate — EVERYTHING PARALLEL. There is no serial lane.
python3 tools/parallel_gate.py --plan plan.json --workers 12 --commit
# plan.json: [{"binary": "...", "drafts": "/abs/path"}, ...]
MEASURED S67, and this is the bar:
| lane | result |
|---|---|
| non-jtbl | 13 banked / 13 binaries / 139 s (12 workers) |
| jtbl | 19 banked / 14 binaries / 188 s (8 workers), 0 refusals |
| the same jtbl work, serially, earlier that day | 58 minutes for ONE binary |
jtbl used to be serial-only because harvest_verify's carve runs make extract and a worktree's
asm/ is a symlink to the main tree — a carving worker would rewrite shared asm. isolate_asm()
fixes it: asm/ is 448 MB but ONE binary's subtree is 3.6-5.0 MB, so a carving job gets
per-binary symlinks plus a real copy of the single binary it carves (~5 MB/worker). It is applied
PER JOB because worker slots are reused, and gated by the same jtbl predicate harvest_verify
carves on.
A CARVE WRITES THREE THINGS AND THE MERGE MUST CARRY ALL THREE — src/<bin>/*.c,
config/splat.<bin>.yaml, and this binary's BLOCK of the shared config/overlays.mk. Carrying only
the first gives a green worker and a red fleet: measured S67, 13 of 213 red, every one a jtbl binary
from that run (reverted, then fixed with ovl_block()/splice_ovl_block()). Never blanket-adopt
overlays.mk — splice the one block, with the same pinned-baseline refusal as a file adopt.
RUN A jtbl GATE WITH --r22. It aborts on a non-green fleet and leaves the files in the tree for
inspection instead of committing red binaries — the guard that would have caught the above at once.
If you are writing for b in binaries: gate_stage ..., STOP. That loop is the hour-long mistake
this section exists to prevent.
6b. (historical) split on jtbl, run both lanes at once
python3 tools/gate_wave.py --drafts <dir> --workers 8 --commit [--r22]
# <dir>/<binary>/<fn>.c
- Parallel is the DEFAULT.
parallel_gate's worktrees measured 4 binaries in 103 s against ~6 min serial. - Only jtbl-bearing drafts go serial, because
harvest_verify's carve runsmake extractand a worktree'sasm/is a symlink to the main tree. All fourmake extractsites are inside the carve path, so a non-jtbl draft never triggers one. - The split PRECEDES the run. A jtbl draft in a worker does not fail cleanly — it re-extracts through the symlink and writes the MAIN tree while other workers read it. "Run everything parallel and re-run the failures" can poison the whole batch.
- Measured cost of getting this wrong: I gated 16 binaries serially to protect ONE jtbl draft —
about an hour for what should have taken minutes.
gate_wave.py's split is now an optimisation (same-binary drafts share a build), NOT a safety requirement.
7. After ANY bank
python3 tools/twin_sweep.py --tier both --workers 10 --commit
The twin pool refills after every bank — a sweep returning 0 is not the end. It delegates its
gate to parallel_gate already.
Known holes, do not trust its "pool is dry": it reads
family_sweep.load_sigs(), which covers 141 of 213 binaries (main,resident, everymd_MAIN_*are absent), and it builds its open-set withint(s.symbol[5:],16)inside a bareexcept Exception: pass, so ONE curated symbol name silently disables an ENTIRE binary (measured:main, 765 of 1048 stubs). Usetools/seed_ref.py --allfor the fleet-wide answer.
8. Harvest — BEFORE the next wave (hard gate)
Write every new idiom into docs/matching-cookbook.md, then regenerate
python3 tools/cookbook_index.py.
This is the project thesis, not hygiene: new idioms make the next exemplar easier and turn mechanical classes into free banks. Then ask of each idiom "is this MECHANICAL?" — if yes, build the sweep and bank the free functions before drafting again.
Harvest periodically, not per-bank: §330 (the neighbour-shape lever, the highest-value entry of S67) was only visible because four independent instances appeared in one wave. One function at a time cannot see it.
9. Verify the FLEET, not the binary
make clean && make extract-all && make check-all # expect "213 passed, 0 failed of 213"
- A bare
make check-allis INCREMENTAL and will lie. It once reported a false 211/213. - Read the EXIT CODE, not the output file (R53). A failed build leaves the PREVIOUS binary on
disk and
sha1sumreads GREEN. This happened twice in one hour in S67 and would have certified a non-compiling resegmentation as byte-neutral. - Propagation is NOT byte-gated.
gate_stageverifies the SOURCE binary, thendedup_propagatewrites N others and nothing re-checks them. That produced a REDov_SC04_018(fleet 212/213) whose cause was a deleted declaration layer the surviving bodies still needed. Run R22 after any propagating gate, not just at session end.
10. Checkpoint
Refresh the 🛑 SESSION CHECKPOINT block at the END of phase-ends/CURRENT_PHASE.md and commit.
Stale is worse than absent. Write it for a session that has none of your context.
Waiting on background work — one trap that costs 40 minutes
pgrep -f matches against every process's full command line, including the waiter's own.
until ! pgrep -f "parallel_gate.py" >/dev/null; do sleep 20; done # WRONG — matches itself
until ! pgrep -f "parallel_[g]ate.py" >/dev/null; do sleep 20; done # better, but NOT sufficient
THE BRACKET IS NOT ENOUGH IF YOU LAUNCH AND WAIT IN ONE SHELL. Measured twice in S67:
- A waiter using the bare pattern matched its own shell and spun 40 minutes while
parallel_gatenever started. - A waiter using the bracketed pattern ALSO spun — for 1 h 35 m — because the same shell
command had launched the job, so its command line contained the UNBRACKETED text too:
nohup … tools/gate_stage.py --binary ov_SC07_007 … ; until ! pgrep -f "gate_[s]tage.py --binary ov_SC07_007"The regexgate_[s]tage.pydoes not match the literalgate_[s]tage.py, but it matches thegate_stage.pysitting in the launch half of the very same line.
LAUNCH DETACHED: setsid nohup <cmd> > log 2>&1 < /dev/null & disown. A plain nohup child
shares the launching shell's PROCESS GROUP, so the harness killing that shell on its timeout kills
the job too — measured S67: a sleep 120 in the launching call discarded 8 completed jtbl carves.
THE RULE: launch and wait in SEPARATE shell invocations. Launch in one call, return, then wait in another whose command line never names the target unbracketed. Better still, wait on a CONDITION the job itself produces — a completion marker in its log — rather than on process liveness:
until grep -q "R22 rc=" .run/<job>.log 2>/dev/null; do sleep 30; done
The tell for both failures: an empty log plus zero ps hits means NEVER STARTED, not "buffered".
Same hazard, from the other side, killed two lane helpers in S60.
Any long-running tool you write must stream its progress (R55). gate_wave.py initially captured
both lanes and printed at the end, leaving a zero-byte log for the whole run — indistinguishable from
a hang.
For the future-decomp template
The reusable content here is not the command list — it is the pairing of each guard with the measurement that produced it. A generic decomp guide can tell you to verify your build; only a project log can tell you that a failed build leaves a stale binary whose hash reads green.
Feeder documents for that template: docs/decision-log.md (R31 — the WHY behind every strategic
pivot), docs/accelerators.md (discoveries that would have sped up earlier work),
docs/hindsight-study.md, docs/matching-cookbook.md (the compiler-idiom knowledge base), and the
phase-ends/ series (the build history).