mirror of
https://github.com/Druthulu/BFM-decomp
synced 2026-09-28 06:49:47 -04:00
Drew T
46097c2339
THE GAP: a drafting agent is briefed to STOP at a plateaued permuter-class residual — right, since an agent grinding a register permutation burns tokens for nothing — so every SCHEDULE-REORDER/DELAY-SLOT/REGALLOC-PERM residual lands unattempted while the local permuter costs no tokens. In S77 the hand-off happened only when I remembered. THE CORRECTION THIS TOOL FORCED. §479 v2 claimed the predictor of a permuter win was 'prior-attempt history: all 3 winners were drafts nobody had worked'. Building the selector on that claim refuted it immediately: journal_notes reports prior attempts for ALL EIGHT known runs, winners included (2, 3, 3). What I had eyeballed was the DRAFT HEADER narrative, a different corpus — the winners came from a recovery pile whose files carry no header journal. That is provenance, not evidence. So the tool selects on the two NECESSARY conditions only (small residual, a match_one class the permuter can search), prints prior-attempt counts as information, and puts the unvalidated filter behind --skip-ground, off by default so it cannot silently discard good work (R39). AND A BUG IN THE NEW TOOL, caught by cross-checking against known-true numbers: wave_results globbed journals across EVERY session and did last-write-wins on a bare function name, so an older wave's row won and carried its stale draft_path — the sweep reported func_8002AC98 at closeness 73 and func_80015608 at 65 while both drafts measure 1 and 3. R48 inside a brand-new tool. Journals are now read newest-last and rows are kept only when the draft lives under this wave's directory. After the fix all seven cross-checkable residuals agree with what the agents independently reported (9, 8, 7, 3, 3, 1, 1). §479 now states the honest position: ~3 in 8 at <=4, no validated predictor, and a note that a yield table is evidence while a story about why is a hypothesis needing its own negative control before it goes in the cookbook.