Step 6 of the wave-closing sequence had not run since t5t. This is that backlog: every wave from t5u
to t8b, 139 transcripts, 14 carrying a novelty signal, each distilled and then adversarially verified
against this book before anything was written.
Verdicts: 7 COVERED, 6 ADDENDUM, 1 NEW (section 314).
The COVERED half is the point, not a loss. The verifiers did real work: the "3 new levers" claimed on
func_80183DA4 were traced to 164-71 + 30 stating the identical composite law (scalar decl places the
frame slot at &-time, COMPONENT_REF keeps MEM_IN_STRUCT_P) with a byte-evidenced worked example, and
the claimed-new delay-slot polarity on func_800CAEC0 turned out to REFINE the 220 S64 addendum rather
than contradict it — that addendum's "polarity means aliasing, never arity" holds only when the draft
has a pin or named alias, which this one did not. That bound is now stated.
Four entries are marked UNPROVEN: they come from drafts the whole-binary gate REFUSED, so the lever
moved match_one's closeness but no byte-equality is claimed (R14/G3). Section 314 is one of them — the
abs-range if/else-if wall, with four structurally different C rewrites measured byte-identical.
Index 921 -> 922 sections, green.
Drew T
5ef1c0e615