Drew T 95909749bb feat(phase-30 S48-T6): recover all 21 "lost" wave-2 drafts from the transcripts — 17 more banked ...

Drew's question ("can you just analyze the workflow results to get those
drafts back?") was right, and my write-off was wrong. The drafts were never
lost: every agent's tool calls are recorded in the run transcripts, content
included. Recovery is deterministic and cost ~0 agent tokens.

Method (all three passes were needed):
1. Write records -> 20 of 21 had one. Naive extraction gated only 8/21,
   because agents REFINE with Edit and I was treating each edit's new_string
   as a whole file.
2. Replay Write-then-Edit in order per (agent, file_path), snapshotting after
   every mutation, then gate every snapshot newest-first -> 20/21 MATCH.
3. The last one (func_8017DF40) never used Write/Edit — it wrote via a shell
   heredoc. Extracted the heredoc bodies from the bash tool calls -> MATCH.

Whole-binary gate on the 21: 17 BANKED, 4 NEAR.
  md_SC03_073 func_801EFC94 x8   <- a MODULE exemplar, through the path fixed
                                    earlier today (commit:1626)
  ov_SC03_014 func_8017C154 x7  func_8017C6A0 x7  func_8017D1E0 x7
  ov_SC03_118 func_80187180 x8  func_80187B80 x8
  ov_SC06_018 func_80185C2C func_8018DE60 func_801850F4 func_801857CC
              func_801880C4 func_80185DD8 (all x6)
  ov_MAIN_012 func_8017DD28 x5 · ov_SC02_026 func_801814D8 x6
  ov_SC03_093 func_8018171C x5 · ov_SC03_107 func_8017EB70 x5
  ov_SC06_008 func_80180000 x8
NEAR at the binary gate: func_8017DF40, func_8017EEEC, func_80187960,
func_8018A974 — the §52b population (per-function MATCH, binary gate refuses).

Wave 2 now stands at 22 of 28 banked (79%) vs wave 1's 8 of 12 (67%), with
20 of 28 drafted by Sonnet.

2026-08-11 20:56:31 -06:00

..

md_SC03_073.c

feat(phase-30 S48-T6): recover all 21 "lost" wave-2 drafts from the transcripts — 17 more banked

2026-08-11 20:56:31 -06:00