gate_main printed ONE recovery chain for every dropped draft, and it was the
SELF chain (fix_arity_callers --any-proto + cast_self_callers) regardless of
what the clashing symbol actually was. Two of the three classes are not that
chain:
CALLEE — §378 does not transfer; cast_self_callers reads the return type off
the draft and cannot cast a callee, so --any-proto runs unprotected
over every call site. S69 measured 60 decls no-protoed, binary RED.
DATA — neither tool in the printed chain touches a data extern at all.
Measured cost of the wrong route THIS session: func_8006252C was dropped on a
clash with itself; following the shape of the printed chain I reached for
scope_demote_drafts first, which aliased D_80078D08 through __asm__ and BROKE
the build. The real blocker was one --sync-decls away. Three tools, wrong
order, one destructive — because the report named a chain instead of a route.
A route is an ORDERED LADDER, not a prediction: for a DATA clash the choice
between adopting the TU's spelling and demoting to block scope depends on
whether the draft can live with the TU's type, which no classifier can know.
The byte gate remains the sole arbiter (G3/P9). Refusals come first (R43/R61a):
a verbatim draft and a NEAR are not declaration problems.
NEGATIVE CONTROL (R39): all 7 S77 drops whose winning tool was already known
route correctly — 2 SELF (cast_self_callers), 1 CALLEE (sync_tu_decls via a
definition header), 4 DATA — and the DATA ladder's order matches which rung
actually won in each case (sync for D_80072978, demote for D_80072960 and
D_80074818). Verbatim draft refused; real-C draft not refused.
Playbook §4b and SETUP updated in the same change.
Drew T
ec258ff75a