The particles for the grey memcard slots already had functions
associated with them, so scaling the grey boxes was simply a matter of
making use of those functions.
The memcard boxes expand and shrink with the aspect to resemble the PS2
behavior, where at 4:3 you get a short grey box and at 16:9 you get a
long grey box.
Although I added scaling to the grey boxes, I wasn't satisfied with the
way elements would "slip" as they would scale differently to each other.
Mainly, the collectable counts and their totals slide more and more off
from each other.
This is due to the game's use of integer offsets to decided UI
placements; they were the right numbers for 4:3, but once you start to
scale, they can slide more and more off. You can see this on a real PS2,
where at 4:3, the collectibles are centered above the totals, and at
16:9, the collectibles are more right-aligned above the totals.
To fix this, I used the same text flags on the totals as the counts, so
everything is snapped to each other.
Guards against `(-> *pc-settings* use-vis?)` ensure PS2 aspects remain
untouched, and at PS2 16:9, you still get the original game bug of more
right aligned counts.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0fa00a5d-0090-4cd0-b68b-8b8f28816185
This attempts to do a best-effort quick fix for the sprite alignment in
the menus and first person views on higher aspect ratios. This:
- Hides the binocular borders completely when using a non-standard ratio
- Hides the borders in jak's first person view when using a non-standard
ratio
- Uses a combination of manual alignment and approximation to get the
pause menu closer.
> 32:9 screenshot.
I accomplished the last one by manually aligning all of the core sprites
and text for the most popular aspect ratios. This means that from a
practical standpoint, things should align "perfectly". However, I then
used all of those values to derive a polynomial for each adjustment
based on the aspect ratio. This allows the game to do a half-decent
approximation/interpolation for every aspect ratio in-between the common
ones. It won't be perfect, but it will be better than this:
This PR does two main things:
1. Work through the main low-hanging fruit issues in the formatter
keeping it from feeling mature and usable
2. Iterate and prove that point by formatting all of the Jak 1 code
base. **This has removed around 100K lines in total.**
- The decompiler will now format it's results for jak 1 to keep things
from drifting back to where they were. This is controlled by a new
config flag `format_code`.
How am I confident this hasn't broken anything?:
- I compiled the entire project and stored it's `out/jak1/obj` files
separately
- I then recompiled the project after formatting and wrote a script that
md5's each file and compares it (`compare-compilation-outputs.py`
- The results (eventually) were the same:
> This proves that the only difference before and after is non-critical
whitespace for all code/macros that is actually in use.
I'm still aware of improvements that could be made to the formatter, as
well as general optimization of it's performance. But in general these
are for rare or non-critical situations in my opinion and I'll work
through them before doing Jak 2. The vast majority looks great and is
working properly at this point. Those known issues are the following if
you are curious:
Relates to #1353
This adds no new functionality or overhead to the compiler, yet. This is
the preliminary work that has:
- added code to the compiler in several spots to flag when something is
used without being properly required/imported/whatever (disabled by
default)
- that was used to generate project wide file dependencies (some
circulars were manually fixed)
- then that graph underwent a transitive reduction and the result was
written to all `jak1` source files.
The next step will be making this actually produce and use a dependency
graph. Some of the reasons why I'm working on this:
- eliminates more `game.gp` boilerplate. This includes the `.gd` files
to some extent (`*-ag` files and `tpage` files will still need to be
handled) this is the point of the new `bundles` form. This should make
it even easier to add a new file into the source tree.
- a build order that is actually informed from something real and
compiler warnings that tell you when you are using something that won't
be available at build time.
- narrows the search space for doing LSP actions -- like searching for
references. Since it would be way too much work to store in the compiler
every location where every symbol/function/etc is used, I have to do
ad-hoc searches. By having a dependency graph i can significantly reduce
that search space.
- opens the doors for common shared code with a legitimate pattern.
Right now jak 2 shares code from the jak 1 folder. This is basically a
hack -- but by having an explicit require syntax, it would be possible
to reference arbitrary file paths, such as a `common` folder.
Some stats:
- Jak 1 has about 2500 edges between files, including transitives
- With transitives reduced at the source code level, each file seems to
have a modest amount of explicit requirements.
Known issues:
- Tracking the location for where `defmacro`s and virtual state
definitions were defined (and therefore the file) is still problematic.
Because those forms are in a macro environment, the reader does not
track them. I'm wondering if a workaround could be to search the
reader's text_db by not just the `goos::Object` but by the text
position. But for the purposes of finishing this work, I just statically
analyzed and searched the code with throwaway python code.
Major change to how `deftype` shows up in our code:
- the decompiler will no longer emit the `offset-assert`,
`method-count-assert`, `size-assert` and `flag-assert` parameters. There
are extremely few cases where having this in the decompiled code is
helpful, as the types there come from `all-types` which already has
those parameters. This also doesn't break type consistency because:
- the asserts aren't compared.
- the first step of the test uses `all-types`, which has the asserts,
which will throw an error if they're bad.
- the decompiler won't emit the `heap-base` parameter unless necessary
now.
- the decompiler will try its hardest to turn a fixed-offset field into
an `overlay-at` field. It falls back to the old offset if all else
fails.
- `overlay-at` now supports field "dereferencing" to specify the offset
that's within a field that's a structure, e.g.:
```lisp
(deftype foobar (structure)
((vec vector :inline)
(flags int32 :overlay-at (-> vec w))
)
)
```
in this structure, the offset of `flags` will be 12 because that is the
final offset of `vec`'s `w` field within this structure.
- **removed ID from all method declarations.** IDs are only ever
automatically assigned now. Fixes#3068.
- added an `:overlay` parameter to method declarations, in order to
declare a new method that goes on top of a previously-defined method.
Syntax is `:overlay <method-name>`. Please do not ever use this.
- added `state-methods` list parameter. This lets you quickly specify a
list of states to be put in the method table. Same syntax as the
`states` list parameter. The decompiler will try to put as many states
in this as it can without messing with the method ID order.
Also changes `defmethod` to make the first type definition (before the
arguments) optional. The type can now be inferred from the first
argument. Fixes#3093.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hat Kid <6624576+Hat-Kid@users.noreply.github.com>
This renames the method object in `defmethod`s to `this` and adds
detection for the `set-time!` and `time-elapsed?` macros.
Definitely my biggest PR yet...
Updates the decompiler for the new format and there's new macros. This
new format should be easier to read/parse.
Also rewrote `sp-init-fields!` (both jak 1 and 2) from assembly to GOAL.
Hopefully I did not miss any regressions in Jak 1/2 while updating the
files, it's a lot.
Grateful Forest