This hasn't been actively maintained for a long time, only receiving
the occasional build update when things break. I doubt anyone has
one of these on their desks anymore.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This function is defined once for each imx family and so is in the way
when compiling a kernel for more than one SoC.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
As crm_regs.h is GPL-v2 only don't allow "(at your option) any later
version" for clock.c any more.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Finally all imx code should end up there, start with mach-mx2. While
touching all files rename some files to use a hyphen instead of an
underscore.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
This fixes:
arch/arm/mach-mx1/mach-scb9328.c:120: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
The new scroll_speed param takes an integer value from 0 to 63, where 0
is slowest and 63 is fastest. The default of 32 remains the same. This
parameter also affects scroll acceleration linearly.
A second part of this change is a tightly coupled modification to the
scroll acceleration. Previously, scroll acceleration could be reset
without lifting the scroll finger. This is rather unintuitive and hard
to control in the case where a user wants faster scrolling, but wants to
hold the scroll touch for longer than a moment.
Note that scroll acceleration levels are now 1-7, where 7 is slowest. In
the previous implementation, there were 8 levels defined, but it was
impossible to start at the slowest level. In order to keep the default
scroll speed unchanged, only 7 levels are used now.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Before this change, sequential scroll events would take a variable
amount of movement due to incorrect accounting. This change ensures all
scroll movements require a deterministic touch movement for an action to
occur.
Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
In submit_bio, we count vm events by check READ/WRITE.
But actually DISCARD_NOBARRIER also has the WRITE flag set.
It looks as if in blkdev_issue_discard, we also add a
page as the payload and the bio_has_data check isn't enough.
So add another check for discard bio.
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
There are few situations where it would make any sense to add a spare
when reducing the number of devices in an array, but it is
conceivable: A 6 drive RAID6 with two missing devices could be
reshaped to a 5 drive RAID6, and a spare could become available
just in time for the reshape, but not early enough to have been
recovered first. 'freezing' recovery can make this easy to
do without any races.
However doing such a thing is a bad idea. md will not record the
partially-recovered state of the 'spare' and when the reshape
finished it will think that the spare is still spare.
Easiest way to avoid this confusion is to simply disallow it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
As the comment says, the tail of this loop only applies to devices
that are not fully in sync, so if In_sync was set, we should avoid
the rest of the loop.
This bug will hardly ever cause an actual problem. The worst it
can do is allow an array to be assembled that is dirty and degraded,
which is not generally a good idea (without warning the sysadmin
first).
This will only happen if the array is RAID4 or a RAID5/6 in an
intermediate state during a reshape and so has one drive that is
all 'parity' - no data - while some other device has failed.
This is certainly possible, but not at all common.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
During a recovery of reshape the early part of some devices might be
in-sync while the later parts are not.
We we know we are looking at an early part it is good to treat that
part as in-sync for stripe calculations.
This is particularly important for a reshape which suffers device
failure. Treating the data as in-sync can mean the difference between
data-safety and data-loss.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When we are reshaping an array, the device failure combinations
that cause us to decide that the array as failed are more subtle.
In particular, any 'spare' will be fully in-sync in the section
of the array that has already been reshaped, thus failures that
affect only that section are less critical.
So encode this subtlety in a new function and call it as appropriate.
The case that showed this problem was a 4 drive RAID5 to 8 drive RAID6
conversion where the last two devices failed.
This resulted in:
good good good good incomplete good good failed failed
while converting a 5-drive RAID6 to 8 drive RAID5
The incomplete device causes the whole array to look bad,
bad as it was actually good for the section that had been
converted to 8-drives, all the data was actually safe.
Reported-by: Terry Morris <tbmorris@tbmorris.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When an array is reshaped to have fewer devices, the reshape proceeds
from the end of the devices to the beginning.
If a device happens to be non-In_sync (which is possible but rare)
we would normally update the ->recovery_offset as the reshape
progresses. However that would be wrong as the recover_offset records
that the early part of the device is in_sync, while in fact it would
only be the later part that is in_sync, and in any case the offset
number would be measured from the wrong end of the device.
Relatedly, if after a reshape a spare is discovered to not be
recoverred all the way to the end, not allow spare_active
to incorporate it in the array.
This becomes relevant in the following sample scenario:
A 4 drive RAID5 is converted to a 6 drive RAID6 in a combined
operation.
The RAID5->RAID6 conversion will cause a 5 drive to be included as a
spare, then the 5drive -> 6drive reshape will effectively rebuild that
spare as it progresses. The 6th drive is treated as in_sync the whole
time as there is never any case that we might consider reading from
it, but must not because there is no valid data.
If we interrupt this reshape part-way through and reverse it to return
to a 5-drive RAID6 (or event a 4-drive RAID5), we don't want to update
the recovery_offset - as that would be wrong - and we don't want to
include that spare as active in the 5-drive RAID6 when the reversed
reshape completed and it will be mostly out-of-sync still.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The entries in the stripe_cache maintained by raid5 are enlarged
when we increased the number of devices in the array, but not
shrunk when we reduce the number of devices.
So if entries are added after reducing the number of devices, we
much ensure to initialise the whole entry, not just the part that
is currently relevant. Otherwise if we enlarge the array again,
we will reference uninitialised values.
As grow_buffers/shrink_buffer now want to use a count that is stored
explicity in the raid_conf, they should get it from there rather than
being passed it as a parameter.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Only level 5 with layout=PARITY_N can be taken over to raid0 now.
Lets allow level 4 either.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Trela <maciej.trela@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
After takeover from raid5/10 -> raid0 mddev->layout is not cleared.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Trela <maciej.trela@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Use mddev->new_layout in setup_conf.
Also use new_chunk, and don't set ->degraded in takeover(). That
gets set in run()
Signed-off-by: Maciej Trela <maciej.trela@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Most array level changes leave the list of devices largely unchanged,
possibly causing one at the end to become redundant.
However conversions between RAID0 and RAID10 need to renumber
all devices (except 0).
This renumbering is currently being done in the ->run method when the
new personality takes over. However this is too late as the common
code in md.c might already have invalidated some of the devices if
they had a ->raid_disk number that appeared to high.
Moving it into the ->takeover method is too early as the array is
still active at that time and wrong ->raid_disk numbers could cause
confusion.
So add a ->new_raid_disk field to mdk_rdev_s and use it to communicate
the new raid_disk number.
Now the common code knows exactly which devices need to be renumbered,
and which can be invalidated, and can do it all at a convenient time
when the array is suspend.
It can also update some symlinks in sysfs which previously were not be
updated correctly.
Reported-by: Maciej Trela <maciej.trela@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Such NULL pointer dereference can occur when the driver was fixing the
read errors/bad blocks and the disk was physically removed
causing a system crash. This patch check if the
rcu_dereference() returns valid rdev before accessing it in fix_read_error().
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Prasanna S. Panchamukhi <prasanna.panchamukhi@riverbed.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Becker <rbecker@riverbed.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Commit b821eaa572 broke partition
detection for md arrays.
The logic was almost right. However if revalidate_disk is called
when the device is not yet open, bdev->bd_disk won't be set, so the
flush_disk() Call will not set bd_invalidated.
So when md_open is called we still need to ensure that
->bd_invalidated gets set. This is easily done with a call to
check_disk_size_change in the place where the offending commit removed
check_disk_change. At the important times, the size will have changed
from 0 to non-zero, so check_disk_size_change will set bd_invalidated.
Tested-by: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Reported-by: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The block number comes from bulkstat based inode lookups to shortcut
the mapping calculations. We ar enot able to trust anything from
bulkstat, so drop the block number as well so that the correct
lookups and mappings are always done.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Inode numbers may come from somewhere external to the filesystem
(e.g. file handles, bulkstat information) and so are inherently
untrusted. Rename the flag we use for these lookups to make it
obvious we are doing a lookup of an untrusted inode number and need
to verify it completely before trying to read it from disk.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
When we decode a handle or do a bulkstat lookup, we are using an
inode number we cannot trust to be valid. If we are deleting inode
chunks from disk (default noikeep mode), then we cannot trust the on
disk inode buffer for any given inode number to correctly reflect
whether the inode has been unlinked as the di_mode nor the
generation number may have been updated on disk.
This is due to the fact that when we delete an inode chunk, we do
not write the clusters back to disk when they are removed - instead
we mark them stale to avoid them being written back potentially over
the top of something that has been subsequently allocated at that
location. The result is that we can have locations of disk that look
like they contain valid inodes but in reality do not. Hence we
cannot simply convert the inode number to a block number and read
the location from disk to determine if the inode is valid or not.
As a result, and XFS_IGET_BULKSTAT lookup needs to actually look the
inode up in the inode allocation btree to determine if the inode
number is valid or not.
It should be noted even on ikeep filesystems, there is the
possibility that blocks on disk may look like valid inode clusters.
e.g. if there are filesystem images hosted on the filesystem. Hence
even for ikeep filesystems we really need to validate that the inode
number is valid before issuing the inode buffer read.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
As reported by Sergei, a couple of braces were missing after
the WARN removal patch.
[07/22] OMAP: hwmod: Replace WARN by pr_warning if clock lookup failed
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/100756/
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: fixed patch description per Anand's E-mail]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Cc: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>
