On unloading of the scmi_perf_domain module got the below splat, when in
the DT provided to the system under test the '#power-domain-cells' property
was missing. Indeed, this particular setup causes the probe to bail out
early without giving any error, which leads to the ->remove() callback gets
to run too, but without all the expected initialized structures in place.
Add a check and bail out early on remove too.
Call trace:
scmi_perf_domain_remove+0x28/0x70 [scmi_perf_domain]
scmi_dev_remove+0x28/0x40 [scmi_core]
device_remove+0x54/0x90
device_release_driver_internal+0x1dc/0x240
driver_detach+0x58/0xa8
bus_remove_driver+0x78/0x108
driver_unregister+0x38/0x70
scmi_driver_unregister+0x28/0x180 [scmi_core]
scmi_perf_domain_driver_exit+0x18/0xb78 [scmi_perf_domain]
__arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1a8/0x2c0
invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf0
do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38
el0_svc+0x34/0xb8
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x100/0x130
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x198
Code: a90153f3 f9403c14 f9414800 955f8a05 (b9400a80)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: 2af23ceb86 ("pmdomain: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240125191756.868860-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Merge the pmdomain fixes for v6.7-rc[n] into the next branch, to allow them
to get tested together with the changes that are targeted for v6.8.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To enable support for performance scaling (DVFS) for generic devices with
the SCMI performance protocol, let's add an SCMI performance domain. This
is being modelled as a genpd provider, with support for performance scaling
through genpd's ->set_performance_state() callback.
Note that, this adds the initial support that allows consumer drivers for
attached devices, to vote for a new performance state via calling the
dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(). However, this should be avoided as
it's in most cases preferred to use the OPP library to vote for a new OPP
instead. The support using the OPP library isn't part of this change, but
needs to be implemented from subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919121605.7304-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>