GuC has its own steering mechanism and can't use the default set by i915,
so we need to provide the steering information that the FW will need to
save/restore registers while processing an engine reset. The GUC
interface allows us to do so as part of the register save/restore list
and it requires us to specify the steering for all multicast register, even
those that would be covered by the default setting for cpu access. Given
that we do not distinguish between registers that do not need steering and
registers that are guaranteed to work the default steering, we set the
steering for all entries in the guc list that do not require a special
steering (e.g. mslice) to the default settings; this will cost us a few
extra writes during engine reset but allows us to keep the steering
logic simple.
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220314234203.799268-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Add a new 'steering' node in each gt's debugfs directory that tells
whether we're using explicit steering for various types of MCR ranges
and, if so, what MMIO ranges it applies to.
We're going to be transitioning away from implicit steering, even for
slice/dss steering soon, so the information reported here will become
increasingly valuable once that happens.
v2:
- Adding missing 'static' on intel_steering_types[] (Jose, sparse)
v3:
- "static const char *" -> "static const char * const" (sparse)
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315170250.954380-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
When running on Xe_HP or beyond, let's use an updated format for
describing topology in our error state dumps and debugfs to give a
more accurate view of the hardware:
- Just report DSS directly without the legacy "slice0" output that's no
longer meaningful.
- Indicate whether each DSS is accessible for geometry and/or compute.
- Rename "rcs_topology" to "sseu_topology" since the information
reported is common to both RCS and CCS engines now.
v2:
- Name static functions in a more consistent manner. (Lucas)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311225459.385515-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Xe_HP removed "slice" as a first-class unit in the hardware design.
Instead we now have a single pool of subslices (which are now referred
to as "DSS") that different hardware units have different ways of
grouping ("compute slices," "geometry slices," etc.). For the purposes
of topology representation, we treat Xe_HP-based platforms as having a
single slice that contains all of the platform's DSS. There's no need
to allocate storage space for (max legacy slices * max dss); let's
update some of our macros to minimize the storage requirement for sseu
topology. We'll also document some of the constants to make it a little
bit more clear what they represent.
v2:
- s/LEGACY/HSW/ in macro names. (Lucas)
- Rename MAX() to SSEU_MAX() to avoid any potential clashes with other
definitions elsewhere. Unfortunately max()/max_t() from
linux/minmax.h cannot be used in this context. (Lucas)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311225459.385515-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
We shouldn't really be keeping track of how many SFC_DONE registers
our platforms can have, but rather how many SFC hardware units there can
be (each SFC unit will have one corresponding SFC_DONE register). So
drop the stray GEN12_SFC_DONE_MAX definition we had in the register
definition file and replace it with an I915_MAX_SFC that follows the
pattern we use for other hardware units. Note that our hardware has a
2:1:1 ratio of VD:VE:SFC, and as far as we know that pattern should
carry forward to future platforms, so we'll define it as #VCS/2.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311062835.163744-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
It looks like this code was accidentally dropped at some point(in a
slightly different form), so add it back. The gist is that if we know
the allocation will be one single chunk, then we can just annotate the
BO with I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS, even if the user doesn't bother. In
the future this should allow us to avoid using vmap for such objects,
in some upcoming patches.
v2(Thomas):
- Tweak the commit message to mention the future motivation
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220202173154.3758970-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
If the vm doesn't request async binding, like for example with the dpt,
then we should be able to skip the async path and avoid calling
i915_vm_lock_objects() altogether. Currently if we have a moving fence
set for the BO(even though it might have signalled), we still take the
async patch regardless of the bind_async setting, and then later still
end up just doing i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence() anyway.
Alternatively we would need to add dummy scratch object which can be
locked, just for the dpt.
Suggested-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220304095934.925036-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
vms are not getting properly closed. Rather than fixing that,
Remove the vm open count and instead rely on the vm refcount.
The vm open count existed solely to break the strong references the
vmas had on the vms. Now instead make those references weak and
ensure vmas are destroyed when the vm is destroyed.
Unfortunately if the vm destructor and the object destructor both
wants to destroy a vma, that may lead to a race in that the vm
destructor just unbinds the vma and leaves the actual vma destruction
to the object destructor. However in order for the object destructor
to ensure the vma is unbound it needs to grab the vm mutex. In order
to keep the vm mutex alive until the object destructor is done with
it, somewhat hackishly grab a vm_resv refcount that is released late
in the vma destruction process, when the vm mutex is no longer needed.
v2: Address review-comments from Niranjana
- Clarify that the struct i915_address_space::skip_pte_rewrite is a hack
and should ideally be replaced in an upcoming patch.
- Remove an unneeded continue in clear_vm_list and update comment.
v3:
- Documentation update
- Commit message formatting
Co-developed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220304082641.308069-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
The current implementation of i915 prime mmap only works when initializing
drm_i915_gem_object with shmem_region.
When using LMEM, drm_i915_gem_object is initialized with ttm_system_region.
In order to make prime mmap work even this case, when using LMEM
(when using ttm in i915), dma_buf_ops.mmap callback function calls
drm_gem_prime_mmap(). drm_gem_prime_mmap() of drm core calls internally
i915_gem_mmap() so that prime mmap can perform normally.
The fake offset is processed inside drm_gem_prime_mmap().
Testcase: igt/prime_mmap
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225131316.1433515-3-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
In the past we've always assumed that an RCS engine is present on every
platform. However now that we have compute engines there may be
platforms that have CCS engines but no RCS, or platforms that are
designed to have both, but have the RCS engine fused off.
Various engine-centric initialization that only needs to be done a
single time for the group of RCS+CCS engines can't rely on being setup
with the RCS now; instead we add a I915_ENGINE_FIRST_RENDER_COMPUTE flag
that will be assigned to a single engine in the group; whichever engine
has this flag will be responsible for some of the general setup
(RCU_MODE programming, initialization of certain workarounds, etc.).
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220303223435.2793124-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
The LRC descriptor pool is going away. Further, the function that was
populating it was also doing a bunch of logic about the context
registration sequence. So, split that code apart into separate state
setup and try to register functions. Note that some of those 'try to
register' code paths actually undo the state setup and leave it to be
redone again later (with potentially different values). This is
inefficient. The next patch will correct this.
Also, move a comment about ignoring return values to the place where
the return values are actually ignored.
v2: Move some more splitting from a later patch (and do it correctly).
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220302003357.4188363-5-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Additional workarounds are required once we start exposing CCS engines.
Note that we have a number of workarounds that update registers in the
shared render/compute reset domain. Historically we've just added such
registers to the RCS engine's workaround list. But going forward we
should be more careful to place such workarounds on a wa_list for an
engine that definitely exists and is not fused off (e.g., a platform
with no RCS would never apply the RCS wa_list). We'll keep
rcs_engine_wa_init() focused on RCS-specific workarounds that only need
to be applied if the RCS engine is present. A separate
general_render_compute_wa_init() function will be used to define
workarounds that touch registers in the shared render/compute reset
domain and that we need to apply regardless of what render and/or
compute engines actually exist. Any workarounds defined in this new
function will internally be added to the first present RCS or CCS
engine's workaround list to ensure they get applied (and only get
applied once rather than being needlessly re-applied several times).
Co-author: Srinivasan Shanmugam
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220301231549.1817978-13-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
HW resources are divided across the active CCS engines at the compute
slice level, with each CCS having priority on one of the cslices.
If a compute slice has no enabled DSS, its paired compute engine is not
usable in full parallel execution because the other ones already fully
saturate the HW, so consider it fused off.
v2 (José):
- moved it to its own function
- fixed definition of ccs_mask
v3 (Matt):
- Replace fls() condition with a simple IP version test
v4 (Matt):
- Don't try to calculate a ccs_mask using
intel_slicemask_from_dssmask() until we've determined that we're
running on an Xe_HP platform where the logic makes sense (and won't
overflow).
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220302052008.1884985-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
There are a few sections in the driver which are not compatible with
PREEMPT_RT. They trigger warnings and can lead to deadlocks at runtime.
Disable the i915 driver on a PREEMPT_RT enabled kernel. This way
PREEMPT_RT itself can be enabled without needing to address the i915
issues first. The RT related patches are still in RT queue and will be
handled later.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/YgqmfKhwU5spS069@linutronix.de
It is possible for reset notifications to arrive for a context that is
in the process of being banned. So don't flag these as an error, just
report it as informational (because it is still useful to know that
resets are happening even if they are being ignored).
v2: Better wording for the message (review feedback from Tvrtko).
v3: Fix rebase issue (review feedback from Daniele).
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225015232.1939497-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
