It makes sense to call the WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE)
from start_isolate_page_range(), but should avoid triggering it from
userspace, i.e, from is_mem_section_removable() because it could crash
the system by a non-root user if warn_on_panic is set.
While at it, simplify the code a bit by removing an unnecessary jump
label.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200120163915.1469-1-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
It is not that hard to trigger lockdep splats by calling printk from
under zone->lock. Most of them are false positives caused by lock
chains introduced early in the boot process and they do not cause any
real problems (although most of the early boot lock dependencies could
happen after boot as well). There are some console drivers which do
allocate from the printk context as well and those should be fixed. In
any case, false positives are not that trivial to workaround and it is
far from optimal to lose lockdep functionality for something that is a
non-issue.
So change has_unmovable_pages() so that it no longer calls dump_page()
itself - instead it returns a "struct page *" of the unmovable page back
to the caller so that in the case of a has_unmovable_pages() failure,
the caller can call dump_page() after releasing zone->lock. Also, make
dump_page() is able to report a CMA page as well, so the reason string
from has_unmovable_pages() can be removed.
Even though has_unmovable_pages doesn't hold any reference to the
returned page this should be reasonably safe for the purpose of
reporting the page (dump_page) because it cannot be hotremoved in the
context of memory unplug. The state of the page might change but that
is the case even with the existing code as zone->lock only plays role
for free pages.
While at it, remove a similar but unnecessary debug-only printk() as
well. A sample of one of those lockdep splats is,
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
------------------------------------------------------
test.sh/8653 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff865a4460 (console_owner){-.-.}, at:
console_unlock+0x207/0x750
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88883fff3c58 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at:
__offline_isolated_pages+0x179/0x3e0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}:
__lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40
lock_acquire+0x126/0x280
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
rmqueue_bulk.constprop.21+0xb6/0x1160
get_page_from_freelist+0x898/0x22c0
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2f3/0x1cd0
alloc_pages_current+0x9c/0x110
allocate_slab+0x4c6/0x19c0
new_slab+0x46/0x70
___slab_alloc+0x58b/0x960
__slab_alloc+0x43/0x70
__kmalloc+0x3ad/0x4b0
__tty_buffer_request_room+0x100/0x250
tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag+0x67/0x110
pty_write+0xa2/0xf0
n_tty_write+0x36b/0x7b0
tty_write+0x284/0x4c0
__vfs_write+0x50/0xa0
vfs_write+0x105/0x290
redirected_tty_write+0x6a/0xc0
do_iter_write+0x248/0x2a0
vfs_writev+0x106/0x1e0
do_writev+0xd4/0x180
__x64_sys_writev+0x45/0x50
do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
-> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}:
__lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40
lock_acquire+0x126/0x280
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50
tty_port_tty_get+0x20/0x60
tty_port_default_wakeup+0xf/0x30
tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x39/0x40
uart_write_wakeup+0x2a/0x40
serial8250_tx_chars+0x22e/0x440
serial8250_handle_irq.part.8+0x14a/0x170
serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x5c/0x90
serial8250_interrupt+0xa6/0x130
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x4f0
handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x100
handle_irq_event+0x5a/0x8b
handle_edge_irq+0x117/0x370
do_IRQ+0x9e/0x1e0
ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a
cpuidle_enter_state+0x156/0x8e0
cpuidle_enter+0x41/0x70
call_cpuidle+0x5e/0x90
do_idle+0x333/0x370
cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f
start_secondary+0x290/0x330
secondary_startup_64+0xb6/0xc0
-> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
__lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40
lock_acquire+0x126/0x280
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50
serial8250_console_write+0x3e4/0x450
univ8250_console_write+0x4b/0x60
console_unlock+0x501/0x750
vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340
vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30
vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4
printk+0x9f/0xc5
-> #0 (console_owner){-.-.}:
check_prev_add+0x107/0xea0
validate_chain+0x8fc/0x1200
__lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40
lock_acquire+0x126/0x280
console_unlock+0x269/0x750
vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340
vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30
vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4
printk+0x9f/0xc5
__offline_isolated_pages.cold.52+0x2f/0x30a
offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x17/0x30
walk_system_ram_range+0xda/0x160
__offline_pages+0x79c/0xa10
offline_pages+0x11/0x20
memory_subsys_offline+0x7e/0xc0
device_offline+0xd5/0x110
state_store+0xc6/0xe0
dev_attr_store+0x3f/0x60
sysfs_kf_write+0x89/0xb0
kernfs_fop_write+0x188/0x240
__vfs_write+0x50/0xa0
vfs_write+0x105/0x290
ksys_write+0xc6/0x160
__x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50
do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
console_owner --> &(&port->lock)->rlock --> &(&zone->lock)->rlock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock);
lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock);
lock(console_owner);
*** DEADLOCK ***
9 locks held by test.sh/8653:
#0: ffff88839ba7d408 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at:
vfs_write+0x25f/0x290
#1: ffff888277618880 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at:
kernfs_fop_write+0x128/0x240
#2: ffff8898131fc218 (kn->count#115){.+.+}, at:
kernfs_fop_write+0x138/0x240
#3: ffffffff86962a80 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}, at:
lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x16/0x50
#4: ffff8884374f4990 (&dev->mutex){....}, at:
device_offline+0x70/0x110
#5: ffffffff86515250 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at:
__offline_pages+0xbf/0xa10
#6: ffffffff867405f0 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at:
percpu_down_write+0x87/0x2f0
#7: ffff88883fff3c58 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at:
__offline_isolated_pages+0x179/0x3e0
#8: ffffffff865a4920 (console_lock){+.+.}, at:
vprintk_emit+0x100/0x340
stack backtrace:
Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL560 Gen10/ProLiant DL560 Gen10,
BIOS U34 05/21/2019
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x86/0xca
print_circular_bug.cold.31+0x243/0x26e
check_noncircular+0x29e/0x2e0
check_prev_add+0x107/0xea0
validate_chain+0x8fc/0x1200
__lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40
lock_acquire+0x126/0x280
console_unlock+0x269/0x750
vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340
vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30
vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4
printk+0x9f/0xc5
__offline_isolated_pages.cold.52+0x2f/0x30a
offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x17/0x30
walk_system_ram_range+0xda/0x160
__offline_pages+0x79c/0xa10
offline_pages+0x11/0x20
memory_subsys_offline+0x7e/0xc0
device_offline+0xd5/0x110
state_store+0xc6/0xe0
dev_attr_store+0x3f/0x60
sysfs_kf_write+0x89/0xb0
kernfs_fop_write+0x188/0x240
__vfs_write+0x50/0xa0
vfs_write+0x105/0x290
ksys_write+0xc6/0x160
__x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50
do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200117181200.20299-1-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If thp defrag setting "defer" is used and a newline is *not* used when
writing to the sysfs file, this is interpreted as the "defer+madvise"
option.
This is because we do prefix matching and if five characters are written
without a newline, the current code ends up comparing to the first five
bytes of the "defer+madvise" option and using that instead.
Use the more appropriate sysfs_streq() that handles the trailing newline
for us. Since this doubles as a nice cleanup, do it in enabled_store()
as well.
The current implementation relies on prefix matching: the number of
bytes compared is either the number of bytes written or the length of
the option being compared. With a newline, "defer\n" does not match
"defer+"madvise"; without a newline, however, "defer" is considered to
match "defer+madvise" (prefix matching is only comparing the first five
bytes). End result is that writing "defer" is broken unless it has an
additional trailing character.
This means that writing "madv" in the past would match and set
"madvise". With strict checking, that no longer is the case but it is
unlikely anybody is currently doing this.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2001171411020.56385@chino.kir.corp.google.com
Fixes: 21440d7eb9 ("mm, thp: add new defer+madvise defrag option")
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
During split huge page, it checks the property of the page. Currently
we do the check on page and head without emphasizing the check is on the
compound page. In case the page passed to split_huge_page_to_list is a
tail page, audience would take some time to think about whether the
check is on compound page or tail page itself.
To make it explicit, use head instead of page for those checks. After
this, audience would be more clear about the checks are on compound page
and the page is used to do the split and dump error message if failed.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200110032610.26499-2-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
When check_pte, pfn of normal, hugetlbfs and THP page need be compared.
The current implementation apply comparison as
- normal 4K page: page_pfn <= pfn < page_pfn + 1
- hugetlbfs page: page_pfn <= pfn < page_pfn + HPAGE_PMD_NR
- THP page: page_pfn <= pfn < page_pfn + HPAGE_PMD_NR
in pfn_in_hpage. For hugetlbfs page, it should be page_pfn == pfn
Now, change pfn_in_hpage to pfn_is_match to highlight that comparison is
not only for THP and explicitly compare for these cases.
No impact upon current behavior, just make the code clear. I think it
is important to make the code clear - comparing hugetlbfs page in range
page_pfn <= pfn < page_pfn + HPAGE_PMD_NR is confusing.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1578737885-8890-1-git-send-email-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If seq_file .next fuction does not change position index, read after
some lseek can generate unexpected output.
In Aug 2018 NeilBrown noticed commit 1f4aace60b ("fs/seq_file.c:
simplify seq_file iteration code and interface") "Some ->next functions
do not increment *pos when they return NULL... Note that such ->next
functions are buggy and should be fixed. A simple demonstration is
dd if=/proc/swaps bs=1000 skip=1
Choose any block size larger than the size of /proc/swaps. This will
always show the whole last line of /proc/swaps"
Described problem is still actual. If you make lseek into middle of
last output line following read will output end of last line and whole
last line once again.
$ dd if=/proc/swaps bs=1 # usual output
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/dm-0 partition 4194812 97536 -2
104+0 records in
104+0 records out
104 bytes copied
$ dd if=/proc/swaps bs=40 skip=1 # last line was generated twice
dd: /proc/swaps: cannot skip to specified offset
v/dm-0 partition 4194812 97536 -2
/dev/dm-0 partition 4194812 97536 -2
3+1 records in
3+1 records out
131 bytes copied
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bd8cfd7b-ac95-9b91-f9e7-e8438bd5047d@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Introduce pin_user_pages*() variations of get_user_pages*() calls, and
also pin_longterm_pages*() variations.
For now, these are placeholder calls, until the various call sites are
converted to use the correct get_user_pages*() or pin_user_pages*() API.
These variants will eventually all set FOLL_PIN, which is also
introduced, and thoroughly documented.
pin_user_pages()
pin_user_pages_remote()
pin_user_pages_fast()
All pages that are pinned via the above calls, must be unpinned via
put_user_page().
The underlying rules are:
* FOLL_PIN is a gup-internal flag, so the call sites should not directly
set it. That behavior is enforced with assertions.
* Call sites that want to indicate that they are going to do DirectIO
("DIO") or something with similar characteristics, should call a
get_user_pages()-like wrapper call that sets FOLL_PIN. These wrappers
will:
* Start with "pin_user_pages" instead of "get_user_pages". That
makes it easy to find and audit the call sites.
* Set FOLL_PIN
* For pages that are received via FOLL_PIN, those pages must be returned
via put_user_page().
Thanks to Jan Kara and Vlastimil Babka for explaining the 4 cases in
this documentation. (I've reworded it and expanded upon it.)
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200107224558.2362728-12-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> [Documentation]
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
As it says in the updated comment in gup.c: current FOLL_LONGTERM
behavior is incompatible with FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY because of the FS
DAX check requirement on vmas.
However, the corresponding restriction in get_user_pages_remote() was
slightly stricter than is actually required: it forbade all
FOLL_LONGTERM callers, but we can actually allow FOLL_LONGTERM callers
that do not set the "locked" arg.
Update the code and comments to loosen the restriction, allowing
FOLL_LONGTERM in some cases.
Also, copy the DAX check ("if a VMA is DAX, don't allow long term
pinning") from the VFIO call site, all the way into the internals of
get_user_pages_remote() and __gup_longterm_locked(). That is:
get_user_pages_remote() calls __gup_longterm_locked(), which in turn
calls check_dax_vmas(). This check will then be removed from the VFIO
call site in a subsequent patch.
Thanks to Jason Gunthorpe for pointing out a clean way to fix this, and
to Dan Williams for helping clarify the DAX refactoring.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200107224558.2362728-7-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
An upcoming patch changes and complicates the refcounting and especially
the "put page" aspects of it. In order to keep everything clean,
refactor the devmap page release routines:
* Rename put_devmap_managed_page() to page_is_devmap_managed(), and
limit the functionality to "read only": return a bool, with no side
effects.
* Add a new routine, put_devmap_managed_page(), to handle decrementing
the refcount for ZONE_DEVICE pages.
* Change callers (just release_pages() and put_page()) to check
page_is_devmap_managed() before calling the new
put_devmap_managed_page() routine. This is a performance point:
put_page() is a hot path, so we need to avoid non- inline function calls
where possible.
* Rename __put_devmap_managed_page() to free_devmap_managed_page(), and
limit the functionality to unconditionally freeing a devmap page.
This is originally based on a separate patch by Ira Weiny, which applied
to an early version of the put_user_page() experiments. Since then,
Jérôme Glisse suggested the refactoring described above.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200107224558.2362728-5-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Suggested-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm/gup: prereqs to track dma-pinned pages: FOLL_PIN", v12.
Overview:
This is a prerequisite to solving the problem of proper interactions
between file-backed pages, and [R]DMA activities, as discussed in [1],
[2], [3], and in a remarkable number of email threads since about
2017. :)
A new internal gup flag, FOLL_PIN is introduced, and thoroughly
documented in the last patch's Documentation/vm/pin_user_pages.rst.
I believe that this will provide a good starting point for doing the
layout lease work that Ira Weiny has been working on. That's because
these new wrapper functions provide a clean, constrained, systematically
named set of functionality that, again, is required in order to even
know if a page is "dma-pinned".
In contrast to earlier approaches, the page tracking can be
incrementally applied to the kernel call sites that, until now, have
been simply calling get_user_pages() ("gup"). In other words, opt-in by
changing from this:
get_user_pages() (sets FOLL_GET)
put_page()
to this:
pin_user_pages() (sets FOLL_PIN)
unpin_user_page()
Testing:
* I've done some overall kernel testing (LTP, and a few other goodies),
and some directed testing to exercise some of the changes. And as you
can see, gup_benchmark is enhanced to exercise this. Basically, I've
been able to runtime test the core get_user_pages() and
pin_user_pages() and related routines, but not so much on several of
the call sites--but those are generally just a couple of lines
changed, each.
Not much of the kernel is actually using this, which on one hand
reduces risk quite a lot. But on the other hand, testing coverage
is low. So I'd love it if, in particular, the Infiniband and PowerPC
folks could do a smoke test of this series for me.
Runtime testing for the call sites so far is pretty light:
* io_uring: Some directed tests from liburing exercise this, and
they pass.
* process_vm_access.c: A small directed test passes.
* gup_benchmark: the enhanced version hits the new gup.c code, and
passes.
* infiniband: Ran rdma-core tests: rdma-core/build/bin/run_tests.py
* VFIO: compiles (I'm vowing to set up a run time test soon, but it's
not ready just yet)
* powerpc: it compiles...
* drm/via: compiles...
* goldfish: compiles...
* net/xdp: compiles...
* media/v4l2: compiles...
[1] Some slow progress on get_user_pages() (Apr 2, 2019): https://lwn.net/Articles/784574/
[2] DMA and get_user_pages() (LPC: Dec 12, 2018): https://lwn.net/Articles/774411/
[3] The trouble with get_user_pages() (Apr 30, 2018): https://lwn.net/Articles/753027/
This patch (of 22):
There are four locations in gup.c that have a fair amount of code
duplication. This means that changing one requires making the same
changes in four places, not to mention reading the same code four times,
and wondering if there are subtle differences.
Factor out the common code into static functions, thus reducing the
overall line count and the code's complexity.
Also, take the opportunity to slightly improve the efficiency of the
error cases, by doing a mass subtraction of the refcount, surrounded by
get_page()/put_page().
Also, further simplify (slightly), by waiting until the the successful
end of each routine, to increment *nr.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200107224558.2362728-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
