Files
linux/kernel
Paul E. McKenney 23a9b748a3 sched: Replace spin_unlock_wait() with lock/unlock pair
There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair.  This commit therefore replaces the spin_unlock_wait() call in
do_task_dead() with spin_lock() followed immediately by spin_unlock().
This should be safe from a performance perspective because the lock is
this tasks ->pi_lock, and this is called only after the task exits.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[ paulmck: Drop smp_mb() based on Peter Zijlstra's analysis:
  http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170811144150.26gowhxte7ri5fpk@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net ]
2017-08-11 13:09:14 -07:00
..
2017-05-12 15:57:15 -07:00
2017-05-23 10:01:37 +02:00
2017-06-12 18:07:43 -04:00
2017-01-12 07:01:56 -07:00
2017-05-18 10:30:19 -06:00
2017-05-08 17:15:12 -07:00
2017-07-14 15:05:13 -07:00
2017-07-06 16:24:33 -07:00
2016-12-22 22:58:37 -05:00
2017-07-12 09:15:00 -07:00