Since commit ac33e91e2d ("blk-iocost: implement vtime loss
compensation") rename original vtime_rate to vtime_base_rate
and current vtime_rate is original vtime_rate with compensation.
The current rate showed in tracepoint is mixed with vtime_rate
and vtime_base_rate:
1) In function ioc_adjust_base_vrate, the first trace_iocost_ioc_vrate_adj
shows vtime_rate, the second trace_iocost_ioc_vrate_adj shows
vtime_base_rate.
2) In function iocg_activate shows vtime_rate by calling
TRACE_IOCG_PATH(iocg_activate...
3) In function ioc_check_iocgs shows vtime_rate by calling
TRACE_IOCG_PATH(iocg_idle...
Trace vtime_base_rate instead of vtime_rate as:
1) Before commit ac33e91e2d ("blk-iocost: implement vtime loss
compensation"), the traced rate is without compensation, so still
show rate without compensation.
2) The vtime_base_rate is more stable while vtime_rate heavily depends on
excess budeget on current period which may change abruptly in next period.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018121932.10792-4-shikemeng@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
63c9eac4b6