Now we are using register_e820_active_regions() instead of
add_active_range() directly. So end_pfn could be different between the
value in early_node_map to node_end_pfn.
So we need to make shrink_active_range() smarter.
shrink_active_range() is a generic MM function in mm/page_alloc.c but
it is only used on 32-bit x86. Should we move it back to some file in
arch/x86?
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
cc1a9d86ce