Files
linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
Jiri Olsa d83971761f selftests/bpf: Fix open call in trigger_fstat_events
Alexei reported compile breakage on newer systems with
following error:

  In file included from /usr/include/fcntl.h:290:0,
  4814                 from ./test_progs.h:29,
  4815                 from
  .../bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c:3:
  4816In function ‘open’,
  4817    inlined from ‘trigger_fstat_events’ at
  .../bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c:50:10,
  4818    inlined from ‘test_d_path’ at
  .../bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/d_path.c:119:6:
  4819/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/fcntl2.h:50:4: error: call to
  ‘__open_missing_mode’ declared with attribute error: open with O_CREAT
  or O_TMPFILE in second argument needs 3 arguments
  4820    __open_missing_mode ();
  4821    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We're missing permission bits as 3rd argument
for open call with O_CREAT flag specified.

Fixes: e4d1af4b16 ("selftests/bpf: Add test for d_path helper")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200826101845.747617-1-jolsa@kernel.org
2020-08-26 07:20:48 -07:00
..
2020-08-06 16:57:05 -07:00

==================
BPF Selftest Notes
==================
General instructions on running selftests can be found in
`Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst`_.

Additional information about selftest failures are
documented here.

bpf_iter test failures with clang/llvm 10.0.0
=============================================

With clang/llvm 10.0.0, the following two bpf_iter tests failed:
  * ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route``
  * ``bpf_iter/netlink``

The symptom for ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` looks like

.. code-block:: c

  2: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)
  ...
  14: (bf) r2 = r8
  15: (0f) r2 += r1
  ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pi6 %02x ", &rt->fib6_dst.addr, rt->fib6_dst.plen);
  16: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +64) = r2
  only read is supported

The symptom for ``bpf_iter/netlink`` looks like

.. code-block:: c

  ; struct netlink_sock *nlk = ctx->sk;
  2: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)
  ...
  15: (bf) r2 = r7
  16: (0f) r2 += r1
  ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK %-3d ", s, s->sk_protocol);
  17: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r2
  only read is supported

This is due to a llvm BPF backend bug. The fix 
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466
has been pushed to llvm 10.x release branch and will be
available in 10.0.1. The fix is available in llvm 11.0.0 trunk.

BPF CO-RE-based tests and Clang version
=======================================

A set of selftests use BPF target-specific built-ins, which might require
bleeding-edge Clang versions (Clang 12 nightly at this time).

Few sub-tests of core_reloc test suit (part of test_progs test runner) require
the following built-ins, listed with corresponding Clang diffs introducing
them to Clang/LLVM. These sub-tests are going to be skipped if Clang is too
old to support them, they shouldn't cause build failures or runtime test
failures:

  - __builtin_btf_type_id() ([0], [1], [2]);
  - __builtin_preserve_type_info(), __builtin_preserve_enum_value() ([3], [4]).

  [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D74572
  [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D74668
  [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85174
  [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D83878
  [4] https://reviews.llvm.org/D83242