Hi!
void __init early_gart_iommu_check(void)
contains
for (num = 24; num < 32; num++) {
if (!early_is_k8_nb(read_pci_config(0, num, 3, 0x00)))
continue;
loop, with very similar loop duplicated in
void __init gart_iommu_hole_init(void)
. First copy of a loop seems to be buggy, too. It uses 0 as a "nothing
set" value, which may actually bite us in last_aper_enabled case
(because it may be often zero).
(Beware, it is hard to test this patch, because this code has about
2^8 different code paths, depending on hardware and cmdline settings).
Plus, the second loop does not check for consistency of
aper_enabled. Should it?
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
fa5b8a30cf