[flake8-simplify] Make fix unsafe if it deletes comments (SIM911) (#22661)

<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->

crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_simplify/SIM911.py

@@ -38,3 +38,13 @@ for country, stars in(zip)(flag_stars.keys(), flag_stars.values()):...
 # Regression test for https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18778
 d = {}
 for country, stars in zip(d.keys(*x), d.values("hello")):...
+
+
+flag_stars = {"USA": 50, "Slovenia": 3, "Panama": 2, "Australia": 6}
+
+for country, stars in zip(
+        flag_stars.keys(),
+        # text
+        flag_stars.values(),
+):
+    print(f"{country}'s flag has {stars} stars.")

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_simplify/rules/zip_dict_keys_and_values.rs

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 use ast::{ExprAttribute, ExprName, Identifier};
+use ruff_diagnostics::Applicability;
 use ruff_macros::{ViolationMetadata, derive_message_formats};
 use ruff_python_ast::{self as ast, Arguments, Expr};
 use ruff_python_semantic::analyze::typing::is_dict;
@@ -30,6 +31,9 @@ use crate::{checkers::ast::Checker, fix::snippet::SourceCodeSnippet};
 ///     print(f"{country}'s flag has {stars} stars.")
 /// ```
 ///
+/// ## Fix safety
+/// This rule's fix is marked as safe, unless the expression contains comments.
+///
 /// ## References
 /// - [Python documentation: `dict.items`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#dict.items)
 #[derive(ViolationMetadata)]
@@ -122,10 +126,17 @@ pub(crate) fn zip_dict_keys_and_values(checker: &Checker, expr: &ast::ExprCall)
         },
         expr.range(),
     );
-    diagnostic.set_fix(Fix::safe_edit(Edit::range_replacement(
-        expected,
-        expr.range(),
-    )));
+
+    let applicability = if checker.comment_ranges().intersects(expr.range()) {
+        Applicability::Unsafe
+    } else {
+        Applicability::Safe
+    };
+
+    diagnostic.set_fix(Fix::applicable_edit(
+        Edit::range_replacement(expected, expr.range()),
+        applicability,
+    ));
 }
 
 fn get_var_attr_args(expr: &Expr) -> Option<(&ExprName, &Identifier, &Arguments)> {

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_simplify/snapshots/ruff_linter__rules__flake8_simplify__tests__SIM911_SIM911.py.snap

@@ -93,3 +93,30 @@ help: Replace `(zip)(flag_stars.keys(), flag_stars.values())` with ` flag_stars.
 37 | 
 38 | # Regression test for https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18778
 39 | d = {}
+
+SIM911 [*] Use `dict.items()` instead of `zip(dict.keys(), dict.values())`
+  --> SIM911.py:45:23
+   |
+43 |   flag_stars = {"USA": 50, "Slovenia": 3, "Panama": 2, "Australia": 6}
+44 |
+45 |   for country, stars in zip(
+   |  _______________________^
+46 | |         flag_stars.keys(),
+47 | |         # text
+48 | |         flag_stars.values(),
+49 | | ):
+   | |_^
+50 |       print(f"{country}'s flag has {stars} stars.")
+   |
+help: Replace `zip(dict.keys(), dict.values())` with `dict.items()`
+42 | 
+43 | flag_stars = {"USA": 50, "Slovenia": 3, "Panama": 2, "Australia": 6}
+44 | 
+   - for country, stars in zip(
+   -         flag_stars.keys(),
+   -         # text
+   -         flag_stars.values(),
+   - ):
+45 + for country, stars in flag_stars.items():
+46 |     print(f"{country}'s flag has {stars} stars.")
+note: This is an unsafe fix and may change runtime behavior