* origin/main:
[ty] Reachability constraints: minor documentation fixes (#21774)
[ty] Fix non-determinism in `ConstraintSet.specialize_constrained` (#21744)
[ty] Improve `@override`, `@final` and Liskov checks in cases where there are multiple reachable definitions (#21767)
[ty] Extend `invalid-explicit-override` to also cover properties decorated with `@override` that do not override anything (#21756)
[ty] Enable LRU collection for parsed module (#21749)
[ty] Support typevar-specialized dynamic types in generic type aliases (#21730)
Add token based `parenthesized_ranges` implementation (#21738)
[ty] Default-specialization of generic type aliases (#21765)
[ty] Suppress false positives when `dataclasses.dataclass(...)(cls)` is called imperatively (#21729)
[syntax-error] Default type parameter followed by non-default type parameter (#21657)
This fixes a non-determinism that we were seeing in the constraint set
tests in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21715.
In this test, we create the following constraint set, and then try to
create a specialization from it:
```
(T@constrained_by_gradual_list = list[Base])
∨
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
```
That is, `T` is either specifically `list[Base]`, or it's any `list`.
Our current heuristics say that, absent other restrictions, we should
specialize `T` to the more specific type (`list[Base]`).
In the correct test output, we end up creating a BDD that looks like
this:
```
(T@constrained_by_gradual_list = list[Base])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ (Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ never
```
In the incorrect output, the BDD looks like this:
```
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ never
```
The difference is the ordering of the two individual constraints. Both
constraints appear in the first BDD, but the second BDD only contains `T
is any list`. If we were to force the second BDD to contain both
constraints, it would look like this:
```
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ (T@constrained_by_gradual_list = list[Base])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ never
```
This is the standard shape for an OR of two constraints. However! Those
two constraints are not independent of each other! If `T` is
specifically `list[Base]`, then it's definitely also "any `list`". From
that, we can infer the contrapositive: that if `T` is not any list, then
it cannot be `list[Base]` specifically. When we encounter impossible
situations like that, we prune that path in the BDD, and treat it as
`false`. That rewrites the second BDD to the following:
```
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ (T@constrained_by_gradual_list = list[Base])
┡━₁ never <-- IMPOSSIBLE, rewritten to never
└─₀ never
```
We then would see that that BDD node is redundant, since both of its
outgoing edges point at the `never` node. Our BDDs are _reduced_, which
means we have to remove that redundant node, resulting in the BDD we saw
above:
```
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ never <-- redundant node removed
```
The end result is that we were "forgetting" about the `T = list[Base]`
constraint, but only for some BDD variable orderings.
To fix this, I'm leaning in to the fact that our BDDs really do need to
"remember" all of the constraints that they were created with. Some
combinations might not be possible, but we now have the sequent map,
which is quite good at detecting and pruning those.
So now our BDDs are _quasi-reduced_, which just means that redundant
nodes are allowed. (At first I was worried that allowing redundant nodes
would be an unsound "fix the glitch". But it turns out they're real!
[This](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/130209) is the
paper that introduces them, though it's very difficult to read. Knuth
mentions them in §7.1.4 of
[TAOCP](https://course.khoury.northeastern.edu/csu690/ssl/bdd-knuth.pdf),
and [this paper](https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10128966) has a nice
short summary of them in §2.)
While we're here, I've added a bunch of `debug` and `trace` level log
messages to the constraint set implementation. I was getting tired of
having to add these by hands over and over. To enable them, just set
`TY_LOG` in your environment, e.g.
```sh
env TY_LOG=ty_python_semantic::types::constraints::SequentMap=trace ty check ...
```
[Note, this has an `internal` label because are still not using
`specialize_constrained` in anything user-facing yet.]
## Summary
For a type alias like the one below, where `UnknownClass` is something
with a dynamic type, we previously lost track of the fact that this
dynamic type was explicitly specialized *with a type variable*. If that
alias is then later explicitly specialized itself (`MyAlias[int]`), we
would miscount the number of legacy type variables and emit a
`invalid-type-arguments` diagnostic
([playground](https://play.ty.dev/886ae6cc-86c3-4304-a365-510d29211f85)).
```py
T = TypeVar("T")
MyAlias: TypeAlias = UnknownClass[T] | None
```
The solution implemented here is not pretty, but we can hopefully get
rid of it via https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1711. Also, once we
properly support `ParamSpec` and `Concatenate`, we should be able to
remove some of this code.
This addresses many of the `invalid-type-arguments` false-positives in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1685. With this change, there are
still some diagnostics of this type left. Instead of implementing even
more (rather sophisticated) workarounds for these cases as well, it
might be much easier to wait for full `ParamSpec`/`Concatenate` support
and then try again.
A disadvantage of this implementation is that we lose track of some
`@Todo` types and replace them with `Unknown`. We could spend more
effort and try to preserve them, but I'm unsure if this is the best use
of our time right now.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests.
## Summary
Implement default-specialization of generic type aliases (implicit or
PEP-613) if they are used in a type expression without an explicit
specialization.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1690
## Typing conformance
```diff
-generics_defaults_specialization.py:26:5: error[type-assertion-failure] Type `SomethingWithNoDefaults[int, str]` does not match asserted type `SomethingWithNoDefaults[int, DefaultStrT]`
```
That's exactly what we want ✔️
All other tests in this file pass as well, with the exception of this
assertion, which is just wrong (at least according to our
interpretation, `type[Bar] != <class 'Bar'>`). I checked that we do
correctly default-specialize the type parameter which is not displayed
in the diagnostic that we raise.
```py
class Bar(SubclassMe[int, DefaultStrT]): ...
assert_type(Bar, type[Bar[str]]) # ty: Type `type[Bar[str]]` does not match asserted type `<class 'Bar'>`
```
## Ecosystem impact
Looks like I should have included this last week 😎
## Test Plan
Updated pre-existing tests and add a few new ones.
## Summary
This PR implements syntax error where a default type parameter is
followed by a non-default type parameter.
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17412#issuecomment-3584088217
## Test Plan
I have written inline tests as directed in #17412
---------
Signed-off-by: 11happy <bhuminjaysoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: 11happy <soni5happy@gmail.com>
This adds a new `suppression` module to the `ruff_linter` crate, similar
to the suppression
module for ty, to parse comments for ruff suppression directives, such
as `# ruff: disable[CODE]`.
## Summary
Fixes#21750 and a related bug in `PLE1142`. We were not properly
considering generators to be valid `await` contexts, which caused the
`F704` issue. One of the tests I added for this also uncovered an issue
in `PLE1142` for comprehensions nested within async generators because
we were only checking the current scope rather than traversing the
nested context.
## Test Plan
Both of these rules are implemented as semantic syntax errors, so I
added tests (and fixes) in both Ruff and ty.
* origin/main: (67 commits)
Move `Token`, `TokenKind` and `Tokens` to `ruff-python-ast` (#21760)
[ty] Don't confuse multiple occurrences of `typing.Self` when binding bound methods (#21754)
Use our org-wide Renovate preset (#21759)
Delete `my-script.py` (#21751)
[ty] Move `all_members`, and related types/routines, out of `ide_support.rs` (#21695)
[ty] Fix find-references for import aliases (#21736)
[ty] add tests for workspaces (#21741)
[ty] Stop testing the (brittle) constraint set display implementation (#21743)
[ty] Use generator over list comprehension to avoid cast (#21748)
[ty] Add a diagnostic for prohibited `NamedTuple` attribute overrides (#21717)
[ty] Fix subtyping with `type[T]` and unions (#21740)
Use `npm ci --ignore-scripts` everywhere (#21742)
[`flake8-simplify`] Fix truthiness assumption for non-iterable arguments in tuple/list/set calls (`SIM222`, `SIM223`) (#21479)
[`flake8-use-pathlib`] Mark fixes unsafe for return type changes (`PTH104`, `PTH105`, `PTH109`, `PTH115`) (#21440)
[ty] Fix auto-import code action to handle pre-existing import
Enable PEP 740 attestations when publishing to PyPI (#21735)
[ty] Fix find references for type defined in stub (#21732)
Use OIDC instead of codspeed token (#21719)
[ty] Exclude `typing_extensions` from completions unless it's really available
[ty] Fix false positives for `class F(Generic[*Ts]): ...` (#21723)
...
In the following example, there are two occurrences of `typing.Self`,
one for `Foo.foo` and one for `Bar.bar`:
```py
from typing import Self, reveal_type
class Foo[T]:
def foo(self: Self) -> T:
raise NotImplementedError
class Bar:
def bar(self: Self, x: Foo[Self]):
# SHOULD BE: bound method Foo[Self@bar].foo() -> Self@bar
# revealed: bound method Foo[Self@bar].foo() -> Foo[Self@bar]
reveal_type(x.foo)
def f[U: Bar](x: Foo[U]):
# revealed: bound method Foo[U@f].foo() -> U@f
reveal_type(x.foo)
```
When accessing a bound method, we replace any occurrences of `Self` with
the bound `self` type.
We were doing this correctly for the second reveal. We would first apply
the specialization, getting `(self: Self@foo) -> U@F` as the signature
of `x.foo`. We would then bind the `self` parameter, substituting
`Self@foo` with `Foo[U@F]` as part of that. The return type was already
specialized to `U@F`, so that substitution had no further affect on the
type that we revealed.
In the first reveal, we would follow the same process, but we confused
the two occurrences of `Self`. We would first apply the specialization,
getting `(self: Self@foo) -> Self@bar` as the method signature. We would
then try to bind the `self` parameter, substituting `Self@foo` with
`Foo[Self@bar]`. However, because we didn't distinguish the two separate
`Self`s, and applied the substitution to the return type as well as to
the `self` parameter.
The fix is to track which particular `Self` we're trying to substitute
when applying the type mapping.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1713
Here are a bunch of (variously failing and passing) mdtests that reflect
the kinds of issues people encounter when running ty over an entire
workspace without sufficient hand-holding (especially because in the IDE
it is unclear *how* to provide that hand-holding).
The `Display` implementation for constraint sets is brittle, and
deserves a rethink. But later! It's perfectly fine for printf debugging;
we just shouldn't be writing mdtests that depend on any particular
rendering details. Most of these tests can be replaced with an
equivalence check that actually validates that the _behavior_ of two
constraint sets are identical.
## Summary
Fixes false positives in SIM222 and SIM223 where truthiness was
incorrectly assumed for `tuple(x)`, `list(x)`, `set(x)` when `x` is not
iterable.
Fixes#21473.
## Problem
`Truthiness::from_expr` recursively called itself on arguments to
iterable initializers (`tuple`, `list`, `set`) without checking if the
argument is iterable, causing false positives for cases like `tuple(0)
or True` and `tuple("") or True`.
## Approach
Added `is_definitely_not_iterable` helper and updated
`Truthiness::from_expr` to return `Unknown` for non-iterable arguments
(numbers, booleans, None) and string literals when called with iterable
initializers, preventing incorrect truthiness assumptions.
## Test Plan
Added test cases to `SIM222.py` and `SIM223.py` for `tuple("")`,
`tuple(0)`, `tuple(1)`, `tuple(False)`, and `tuple(None)` with `or True`
and `and False` patterns.
---------
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
Douglas Creager
David Peter
Alex Waygood
Micha Reiser
Denys Zhak
Bhuminjay Soni
Amethyst Reese
Ibraheem Ahmed
Brent Westbrook
William Woodruff
Aria Desires
Charlie Marsh
Dan Parizher