## Summary
This PR removes the `debug_assertion` in the `Indexer` to allow
unterminated f-strings. This is mainly a fix in the development build
which now matches the release build.
The fix is simple: remove the `debug_assertion` which means that the
there could be `FStringStart` and possibly `FStringMiddle` tokens
without a corresponding f-string range in the `Indexer`. This means that
the code requesting for the f-string index need to account for the
`None` case, making the code safer.
This also updates the code which queries the `FStringRanges` to account
for the `None` case. This will happen when the `FStringStart` /
`FStringMiddle` tokens are present but the `FStringEnd` token isn't
which means that the `Indexer` won't contain the range for that
f-string.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Taking the following code as an example:
```python
f"{123}
```
This only emits a `FStringStart` token, but no `FStringMiddle` or
`FStringEnd` tokens.
And,
```python
f"\.png${
```
This emits a `FStringStart` and `FStringMiddle` token, but no
`FStringEnd` token.
fixes: #8065
## Summary
This PR fixes the `W605` rule implementation to provide the quickfix
message as
per the fix provided.
## Test Plan
Update snapshots.
fixes: #8155
## Summary
Avoid warning about incompatible rules except if their configuration
directly conflicts with the formatter. This should reduce the noise and
potentially the need for https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8175
and https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8185
I also extended the rule and option documentation to mention any
potential formatter incompatibilities or whether they're redundant when
using the formatter.
* `LineTooLong`: This is a use case we explicitly want to support. Don't
warn about it
* `TabIndentation`, `IndentWithSpaces`: Only warn if
`indent-style="tab"`
* `IndentationWithInvalidMultiple`,
`IndentationWithInvalidMultipleComment`: Only warn if `indent-width !=
4`
* `OverIndented`: Don't warn, but mention that the rule is redundant
* `BadQuotesInlineString`: Warn if quote setting is different from
`format.quote-style`
* `BadQuotesMultilineString`, `BadQuotesDocstring`: Warn if `quote !=
"double"`
## Test Plan
I added a new integration test for the default configuration with `ALL`.
`ruff format` now only shows two incompatible rules, which feels more
reasonable.
## Summary
This rule is now unsafe if we can't verify that the `obj` in `raise
obj()` is a class or builtin. (If we verify that it's a function, we
don't raise at all, as before.)
See the documentation change for motivation behind the unsafe edit.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8228.
## Summary
This PR refactors the formatter diff code to reuse the
`SourceKind::diff` logic. This has the benefit that the Notebook diff
now includes the cell numbers which was not present before.
## Test Plan
Update the snapshots and verified the cell numbers.
## Summary
Python 3.12 added the `__buffer__()`/`__release_buffer_()` special
methods, which are incorrectly flagged as invalid dunder methods by
`PLW3201`.
## Test Plan
Added definitions to the test suite, and confirmed they failed without
the fix and are ignored after the fix was done.
## Summary
This PR renames the `tab-size` configuration option to `indent-width` to
express that the formatter uses the option to determine the indentation
width AND as tab width.
I first preferred naming the option `tab-width` but then decided to go
with `indent-width` because:
* It aligns with the `indent-style` option
* It would allow us to write a lint rule that asserts that each
indentation uses `indent-width` spaces.
Closes#7643
## Test Plan
Added integration test
## Summary
This PR introduces a new `pycodestyl.max-line-length` option that allows overriding the global `line-length` option for `E501` only.
This is useful when using the formatter and `E501` together, where the formatter uses a lower limit and `E501` is only used to catch extra-long lines.
Closes#7644
## Considerations
~~Our fix infrastructure asserts in some places that the fix doesn't exceed the configured `line-width`. With this change, the question is whether it should use the `pycodestyle.max-line-width` or `line-width` option to make that decision.
I opted for the global `line-width` for now, considering that it should be the lower limit. However, this constraint isn't enforced and users not using the formatter may only specify `pycodestyle.max-line-width` because they're unaware of the global option (and it solves their need).~~
~~I'm interested to hear your thoughts on whether we should use `pycodestyle.max-line-width` or `line-width` to decide on whether to emit a fix or not.~~
Edit: The linter users `pycodestyle.max-line-width`. The `line-width` option has been removed from the `LinterSettings`
## Test Plan
Added integration test. Built the documentation and verified that the links are correct.
## Summary
First time contribute to `ruff`, so If there are low-level errors,
please forgive me. 🙇
Introduce auto fix for `E275`, this partially address #8121.
## Test Plan
Already coverd.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Close#8123
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
New test cases
---------
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR updates our E721 implementation and semantics to match the
updated `pycodestyle` logic, which I think is an improvement.
Specifically, we now allow `type(obj) is int` for exact type
comparisons, which were previously impossible. So now, we're largely
just linting against code like `type(obj) == int`.
This change is gated to preview mode.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7904.
## Test Plan
Updated the test fixture and ensured parity with latest Flake8.
## Summary
This PR updates our documentation for the upcoming formatter release.
Broadly, the documentation is now structured as follows:
- Overview
- Tutorial
- Installing Ruff
- The Ruff Linter
- Overview
- `ruff check`
- Rule selection
- Error suppression
- Exit codes
- The Ruff Formatter
- Overview
- `ruff format`
- Philosophy
- Configuration
- Format suppression
- Exit codes
- Black compatibility
- Known deviations
- Configuring Ruff
- pyproject.toml
- File discovery
- Configuration discovery
- CLI
- Shell autocompletion
- Preview
- Rules
- Settings
- Integrations
- `pre-commit`
- VS Code
- LSP
- PyCharm
- GitHub Actions
- FAQ
- Contributing
The major changes include:
- Removing the "Usage" section from the docs, and instead folding that
information into "Integrations" and the new Linter and Formatter
sections.
- Breaking up "Configuration" into "Configuring Ruff" (for generic
configuration), and new Linter- and Formatter-specific sections.
- Updating all example configurations to use `[tool.ruff.lint]` and
`[tool.ruff.format]`.
My suggestion is to pull and build the docs locally, and review by
reading them in the browser rather than trying to parse all the code
changes.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7235.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7647.
This is my first PR and I'm new at rust, so feel free to ask me to
rewrite everything if needed ;)
The rule must be called after deferred lambas have been visited because
of the last check (whether the lambda parameters are used in the body of
the function that's being called). I didn't know where to do it, so I
did what I could to be able to work on the rule itself:
- added a `ruff_linter::checkers::ast::analyze::lambda` module
- build a vec of visited lambdas in `visit_deferred_lambdas`
- call `analyze::lambda` on the vec after they all have been visited
Building that vec of visited lambdas was necessary so that bindings
could be properly resolved in the case of nested lambdas.
Note that there is an open issue in pylint for some false positives, do
we need to fix that before merging the rule?
https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/issues/8192
Also, I did not provide any fixes (yet), maybe we want do avoid merging
new rules without fixes?
## Summary
Checks for lambdas whose body is a function call on the same arguments
as the lambda itself.
### Bad
```python
df.apply(lambda x: str(x))
```
### Good
```python
df.apply(str)
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared pylint and ruff output on pylint's test cases.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/messages/warning/unnecessary-lambda.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/base/basic_checker.py#L521-L587)
- https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970
## Summary
The lint checks for number of arguments in a function *definition*, but
the message says “function *call*”
## Test Plan
See what breaks and change the tests
Given `print(*a_list_with_elements, sep="\n")`, we can't remove the
separator (unlike in `print(a, sep="\n")`), since we don't know how many
arguments were provided.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8078.
- Add changelog entry for 0.1.1
- Bump version to 0.1.1
- Require preview for fix added in #7967
- Allow duplicate headings in changelog (markdownlint setting)
## Summary
In #6157 a warning was introduced when users use `ruff: noqa`
suppression in-line instead of at the file-level. I had this trigger
today after forgetting about it, and the warning is an excellent
improvement.
I knew immediately what the issue was because I raised it previously,
but on reading the warning I'm not sure it would be so obvious to all
users. This PR extends the error with a short sentence explaining that
line-level suppression should omit the `ruff:` prefix.
## Test Plan
Not sure it's necessary for such a trivial change :)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7968, I introduced a
regression whereby we started to treat imports used _only_ in type
annotation bounds (with `__future__` annotations) as unused.
The root of the issue is that I started using `visit_annotation` for
these bounds. So we'd queue up the bound in the list of deferred type
parameters, then when visiting, we'd further queue it up in the list of
deferred type annotations... Which we'd then never visit, since deferred
type annotations are visited _before_ deferred type parameters.
Anyway, the better solution here is to use a dedicated flag for these,
since they have slightly different behavior than type annotations.
I've also fixed what I _think_ is a bug whereby we previously failed to
resolve `Callable` in:
```python
type RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]
from collections.abc import Callable
```
IIUC, the values in type aliases should be evaluated lazily, like type
parameters.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8017.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Rule B005 of flake8-bugbear docs has a typo in one of the examples that
leads to a confusion in the correctness of `.strip()` method
```python
# Wrong output (used in docs)
"text.txt".strip(".txt") # "ex"
# Correct output
"text.txt".strip(".txt") # "e"
```
## Summary
### What it does
This rule triggers an error when a bare raise statement is not in an
except or finally block.
### Why is this bad?
If raise statement is not in an except or finally block, there is no
active exception to
re-raise, so it will fail with a `RuntimeError` exception.
### Example
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise
```
Use instead:
```python
def validate_positive(x):
if x <= 0:
raise ValueError(f"{x} is not positive")
```
## Test Plan
Added unit test and snapshot.
Manually compared ruff and pylint outputs on pylint's tests.
## References
- [pylint
documentation](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/stable/user_guide/messages/error/misplaced-bare-raise.html)
- [pylint
implementation](https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/exceptions.py#L339)
## Summary
Given `type RecordOrThings = Record | int | str`, the right-hand side
won't be evaluated at runtime. Same goes for `Record` in `type
RecordCallback[R: Record] = Callable[[R], None]`. This PR modifies the
visitation logic to treat them as typing-only.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7966.
## Summary
This PR adds a new `cell` field to the JSON output format which
indicates the Notebook cell this diagnostic (and fix) belongs to. It
also updates the location for the diagnostic and fixes as per the
`NotebookIndex`. It will be used in the VSCode extension to display the
diagnostic in the correct cell.
The diagnostic and edit start and end source locations are translated
for the notebook as per the `NotebookIndex`. The end source location for
an edit needs some special handling.
### Edit end location
To understand this, the following context is required:
1. Visible lines in Jupyter Notebook vs JSON array strings: The newline
is part of the string in the JSON format. This means that if there are 3
visible lines in a cell where the last line is empty then the JSON would
contain 2 strings in the source array, both ending with a newline:
**JSON format:**
```json
[
"# first line\n",
"# second line\n",
]
```
**Notebook view:**
```python
1 # first line
2 # second line
3
```
2. If an edit needs to remove an entire line including the newline, then
the end location would be the start of the next row.
To remove a statement in the following code:
```python
import os
```
The edit would be:
```
start: row 1, col 1
end: row 2, col 1
```
Now, here's where the problem lies. The notebook index doesn't have any
information for row 2 because it doesn't exists in the actual notebook.
The newline was added by Ruff to concatenate the source code and it's
removed before writing back. But, the edit is computed looking at that
newline.
This means that while translating the end location for an edit belong to
a Notebook, we need to check if both the start and end location belongs
to the same cell. If not, then the end location should be the first
character of the next row and if so, translate that back to the last
character of the previous row. Taking the above example, the translated
location for Notebook would be:
```
start: row 1, col 1
end: row 1, col 10
```
## Test Plan
Add test cases for notebook output in the JSON format and update
existing snapshots.
## Summary
This PR refactors the `NotebookIndex` struct to use `OneIndexed` to make
the
intent of the code clearer.
## Test Plan
Update the existing test case and run `cargo test` to verify the change.
- [x] Verify `--diff` output
- [x] Verify the diagnostics output
- [x] Verify `--show-source` output
## Summary
This PR fixes the bug where the rule `E251` was being triggered on a equal token
inside a f-string which was used in the context of debug expressions.
For example, the following was being flagged before the fix:
```python
print(f"{foo = }")
```
But, now it is not. This leads to false negatives such as:
```python
print(f"{foo(a = 1)}")
```
One solution would be to know if the opened parentheses was inside a f-string or
not. If it was then we can continue flagging until it's closed. If not, then we
should not flag it.
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and check that they don't raise any false positives.
fixes: #7882
## Summary
`foo(**{})` was an overlooked edge case for `PIE804` which introduced a
crash within the Fix, introduced in #7884.
I've made it so that `foo(**{})` turns into `foo()` when applied with
`--fix`, but is that desired/expected? 🤔 Should we just ignore instead?
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7572
Drops formatting specific rules from the default rule set as they
conflict with formatters in general (and in particular, conflict with
our formatter). Most of these rules are in preview, but the removal of
`line-too-long` and `mixed-spaces-and-tabs` is a change to the stable
rule set.
## Example
The following no longer raises `E501`
```
echo "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = 1" | ruff check -
```
## Summary
Throughout the codebase, we have this pattern:
```rust
let mut diagnostic = ...
if checker.patch(Rule::UnusedVariable) {
// Do the fix.
}
diagnostics.push(diagnostic)
```
This was helpful when we computed fixes lazily; however, we now compute
fixes eagerly, and this is _only_ used to ensure that we don't generate
fixes for rules marked as unfixable.
We often forget to add this, and it leads to bugs in enforcing
`--unfixable`.
This PR instead removes all of these checks, moving the responsibility
of enforcing `--unfixable` up to `check_path`. This is similar to how
@zanieb handled the `--extend-unsafe` logic: we post-process the
diagnostics to remove any fixes that should be ignored.
## Summary
Add autofix for `PLR1714` using tuples.
If added complexity is desired, we can lean into the `set` part by doing
some kind of builtin check on all of the comparator elements for
starters, since we otherwise don't know if something's hashable.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`, and manually.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7912
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Adds two configuration-file only settings `extend-safe-fixes` and
`extend-unsafe-fixes` which can be used to promote and demote the
applicability of fixes for rules.
Fixes with `Never` applicability cannot be promoted.
## Summary
Given:
```python
baz: Annotated[
str,
[qux for qux in foo],
]
```
We treat `baz` as `BindingKind::Annotation`, to ensure that references
to `baz` are marked as unbound. However, we were _also_ treating `qux`
as `BindingKind::Annotation`, which meant that the load in the
comprehension _also_ errored.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7879.
## Summary
This PR upgrades some rules from "sometimes" to "always" fixes, now that
we're getting ready to ship support in the CLI. The focus here was on
identifying rules for which the diagnostic itself is high-confidence,
and the fix itself is too (assuming that the diagnostic is correct).
This is _unlike_ rules that _may_ be a false positive, like those that
(e.g.) assume an object is a dictionary when you call `.values()` on it.
Specifically, I upgraded:
- A bunch of rules that only apply to `.pyi` files.
- Rules that rewrite deprecated imports or aliases.
- Some other misc. rules, like: `empty-print-string`, `unused-noqa`,
`getattr-with-constant`.
Open to feedback on any of these.
## Summary
Adds autofix to `PYI030`
Closes#7854.
Unsure if the cloning method I chose is the best solution here, feel
free to suggest alternatives!
## Test Plan
`cargo test` as well as manually
## Summary
Restores functionality of #7875 but in the correct place. Closes#7877.
~~I couldn't figure out how to get cargo fmt to work, so hopefully
that's run in CI.~~ Nevermind, figured it out.
## Test Plan
Can see output of json.
## Summary
Fixes#7853.
The old and new source files were reversed in the call to
`TextDiff::from_lines`, so the diff output of the CLI was also reversed.
## Test Plan
Two snapshots were updated in the process, so any reversal should be
caught :)
Lukas Burgholzer
Dhruv Manilawala
Charlie Marsh
Micha Reiser
Spencer Brown
Zanie Blue
Weijie Guo
Harutaka Kawamura
Claudio Jolowicz
Flowrey
Steve C
Clément Schreiner
Valeriy Savchenko
Philipp A
Tony Lykke
Ahmed Ashraf
Sven Hager
Victor Hugo Gomes
Jake Park
T-256
Henry Schreiner
Alex Waygood
bluthej