## Summary
Part 1 of the big change introduced in #14828. This temporarily causes
all fixes for `round(...)` to be considered unsafe, but they will
eventually be enhanced.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
## Summary
Close#11243. Fix `pytest-parametrize-names-wrong-type (PT006)` to edit
both `argnames` and `argvalues` if both of them are single-element
tuples/lists.
```python
# Before fix
@pytest.mark.parametrize(("x",), [(1,), (2,)])
def test_foo(x):
...
# After fix:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("x", [1, 2])
def test_foo(x):
...
```
## Test Plan
New test cases
This PR introduces three changes to the diagnostic and fix behavior
(still under preview) for [boolean-chained-comparison
(PLR1716)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/boolean-chained-comparison/#boolean-chained-comparison-plr1716).
1. We now offer a _fix_ in the case of parenthesized expressions like
`(a < b) and b < c`. The fix will merge the chains of comparisons and
then balance parentheses by _adding_ parentheses to one side of the
expression.
2. We now trigger a diagnostic (and fix) in the case where some
comparisons have multiple comparators like `a < b < c and c < d`.
3. When adjacent comparators are parenthesized, we prefer the left
parenthesization and apply the replacement to the whole parenthesized
range. So, for example, `a < (b) and ((b)) < c` becomes `a < (b) < c`.
While these seem like somewhat disconnected changes, they are actually
related. If we only offered (1), then we would see the following fix
behavior:
```diff
- (a < b) and b < c and ((c < d))
+ (a < b < c) and ((c < d))
```
This is because the fix which add parentheses to the first pair of
comparisons overlaps with the fix that removes the `and` between the
second two comparisons. So the latter fix is deferred. However, the
latter fix does not get a second chance because, upon the next lint
iteration, there is no violation of `PLR1716`.
Upon adopting (2), however, both fixes occur by the time ruff completes
several iterations and we get:
```diff
- (a < b) and b < c and ((c < d))
+ ((a < b < c < d))
```
Finally, (3) fixes a previously unobserved bug wherein the autofix for
`a < (b) and b < c` used to result in `a<(b<c` which gives a syntax
error. It could in theory have been fixed in a separate PR, but seems to
be on theme here.
----------
- Closes#13524
- (1), (2), and (3) are implemented in separate commits for ease of
review and modification.
- Technically a user can trigger an error in ruff (by reaching max
iterations) if they have a humongous boolean chained comparison with
differing parentheses levels.
Improves error message for [except*](https://peps.python.org/pep-0654/)
(Rules: B025, B029, B030, B904)
Example python snippet:
```python
try:
a = 1
except* ValueError:
a = 2
except* ValueError:
a = 2
try:
pass
except* ():
pass
try:
pass
except* 1: # error
pass
try:
raise ValueError
except* ValueError:
raise UserWarning
```
Error messages
Before:
```
$ ruff check --select=B foo.py
foo.py:6:9: B025 try-except block with duplicate exception `ValueError`
foo.py:11:1: B029 Using `except ():` with an empty tuple does not catch anything; add exceptions to handle
foo.py:16:9: B030 `except` handlers should only be exception classes or tuples of exception classes
foo.py:22:5: B904 Within an `except` clause, raise exceptions with `raise ... from err` or `raise ... from None` to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
Found 4 errors.
```
After:
```
$ ruff check --select=B foo.py
foo.py:6:9: B025 try-except* block with duplicate exception `ValueError`
foo.py:11:1: B029 Using `except* ():` with an empty tuple does not catch anything; add exceptions to handle
foo.py:16:9: B030 `except*` handlers should only be exception classes or tuples of exception classes
foo.py:22:5: B904 Within an `except*` clause, raise exceptions with `raise ... from err` or `raise ... from None` to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
Found 4 errors.
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14791
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
Airflow 3.0 removes various deprecated functions, members, modules, and
other values. They have been deprecated in 2.x, but the removal causes
incompatibilities that we want to detect. This PR deprecates the
following names.
* in `DAG`
* `sla_miss_callback` was removed
* in `airflow.operators.trigger_dagrun.TriggerDagRunOperator`
* `execution_date` was removed
* in `airflow.operators.weekday.DayOfWeekSensor`,
`airflow.operators.datetime.BranchDateTimeOperator` and
`airflow.operators.weekday.BranchDayOfWeekOperator`
* `use_task_execution_day` was removed in favor of
`use_task_logical_date`
The full list of rules we will extend
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/44556
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
A test fixture is included in the PR.
When fixing an invalid escape sequence in an f-string, each f-string
element is analyzed for valid escape characters prior to creating the
diagnostic and fix. This allows us to safely prefix with `r` to create a
raw string if no valid escape characters were found anywhere in the
f-string, and otherwise insert backslashes.
This fixes a bug in the original implementation: each "f-string part"
was treated separately, so it was not possible to tell whether a valid
escape character was or would be used elsewhere in the f-string.
Progress towards #11491 but format specifiers are not handled in this
PR.
## Summary
This PR makes changes to the `AIR001` rule as per
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14627#discussion_r1860212307.
Additionally,
* Avoid returning the `Diagnostic` and update the checker in the rule
logic for consistency
* Remove test case for different keyword position (I don't think it's
required here)
## Test Plan
Add test cases for multiple operators from various modules.
## Summary
Just some minor followups to the recently merged RUF052 rule, that was
added in bf0fd04:
- Some small tweaks to the docs
- A minor code-style nit
- Some more tests for my peace of mind, just to check that the new
methods on the semantic model are working correctly
I'm adding the "internal" label as this doesn't deserve a changelog
entry. RUF052 is a new rule that hasn't been released yet.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p ruff_linter`
This PR extends the Decimal parsing used in [verbose-decimal-constructor
(FURB157)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/verbose-decimal-constructor/)
to better handle non-finite `Decimal` objects, avoiding some false
negatives.
Closes#14587
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This PR implements new rule discussed
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/14449).
In short, it searches for assert messages which were unintentionally
used as a expression to be matched against.
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and review of `ruff-ecosystem`
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fix#14525
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
New test cases
---------
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
## Summary
Resolves#12616.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Resolves#14378.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Implements `redundant-bool-literal`
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
`cargo test`
The ecosystem results are all correct, but for `Airflow` the rule is not
relevant due to the use of overloading (and is marked as unsafe
correctly).
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR adds autofix for `redundant-numeric-union` (`PYI041`)
There are some comments below to explain the reasoning behind some
choices that might help review.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Resolves part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14185.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Fix: #13934
## Summary
Current implementation has a bug when the current annotation contains a
string with single and double quotes.
TL;DR: I think these cases happen less than other use cases of Literal.
So instead of fixing them we skip the fix in those cases.
One of the problematic cases:
```
from typing import Literal
from third_party import Type
def error(self, type1: Type[Literal["'"]]):
pass
```
The outcome is:
```
- def error(self, type1: Type[Literal["'"]]):
+ def error(self, type1: "Type[Literal[''']]"):
```
While it should be:
```
"Type[Literal['\'']"
```
The solution in this case is that we check if there’s any quotes same as
the quote style we want to use for this Literal parameter then escape
that same quote used in the string.
Also this case is not uncommon to have:
<https://grep.app/search?current=2&q=Literal["'>
But this can get more complicated for example in case of:
```
- def error(self, type1: Type[Literal["\'"]]):
+ def error(self, type1: "Type[Literal[''']]"):
```
Here we escaped the inner quote but in the generated annotation it gets
removed. Then we flip the quote style of the Literal paramter and the
formatting is wrong.
In this case the solution is more complicated.
1. When generating the string of the source code preserve the backslash.
2. After we have the annotation check if there isn’t any escaped quote
of the same type we want to use for the Literal parameter. In this case
check if we have any `’` without `\` before them. This can get more
complicated since there can be multiple backslashes so checking for only
`\’` won’t be enough.
Another problem is when the string contains `\n`. In case of
`Type[Literal["\n"]]` we generate `'Type[Literal["\n"]]'` and both
pyright and mypy reject this annotation.
https://pyright-play.net/?code=GYJw9gtgBALgngBwJYDsDmUkQWEMoAySMApiAIYA2AUAMaXkDOjUAKoiQNqsC6AXFAB0w6tQAmJYLBKMYAfQCOAVzCk5tMChjlUjOQCNytANaMGjABYAKRiUrAANLA4BGAQHJ2CLkVIVKnABEADoogTw87gCUfNRQ8VAITIyiElKksooqahpaOih6hiZmTNa29k7w3m5sHJy%2BZFRBoeE8MXEJScxAA
## Test Plan
I added test cases for the original code in the reported issue and two
more cases for backslash and new line.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
This PR handles a panic that occurs when applying unsafe fixes if a user
inserts a required import (I002) that has a "useless alias" in it, like
`import numpy as numpy`, and also selects PLC0414 (useless-import-alias)
In this case, the fixes alternate between adding the required import
statement, then removing the alias, until the recursion limit is
reached. See linked issue for an example.
Closes#14283
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Resolves#13217.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR improves the fix for `PYI055` to be able to handle nested and
mixed type unions.
It also marks the fix as unsafe when comments are present.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
`pytest-raises-too-broad (PT011)` should be raised when
`expected_exception` is provided as a keyword argument.
```python
def test_foo():
with pytest.raises(ValueError): # raises PT011
raise ValueError("Can't divide 1 by 0")
# This is minor but a valid pytest.raises call
with pytest.raises(expected_exception=ValueError): # doesn't raise PT011 but should
raise ValueError("Can't divide 1 by 0")
```
`pytest.raises` doc:
https://docs.pytest.org/en/8.3.x/reference/reference.html#pytest.raises
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Unit tests
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Related to #970. Implement [`shallow-copy-environ /
W1507`](https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user_guide/messages/warning/shallow-copy-environ.html).
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Unit test
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon Brugman <sbrugman@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
It's only safe to enforce the `x in "1234567890"` case if `x` is exactly
one character, since the set on the right has been reordered as compared
to `string.digits`. We can't know if `x` is exactly one character unless
it's a literal. And if it's a literal, well, it's kind of silly code in
the first place?
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13802.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fix `await-outside-async` to allow `await` at the top-level scope of a
notebook.
```python
# foo.ipynb
await asyncio.sleep(1) # should be allowed
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
A unit test
## Summary
Resolves#13833.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
This PR accounts for further subtleties in `Decimal` parsing:
- Strings which are empty modulo underscores and surrounding whitespace
are skipped
- `Decimal("-0")` is skipped
- `Decimal("{integer literal that is longer than 640 digits}")` are
skipped (see linked issue for explanation)
NB: The snapshot did not need to be updated since the new test cases are
"Ok" instances and added below the diff.
Closes#14204
## Summary
Implementation for one of the rules in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/1348
Refurb only deals only with classes with a single base, however the rule
is valid for any base.
(`str, Enum` is common prior to `StrEnum`)
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
Flake8-builtins provides two checks for arguments (really, parameters)
of a function shadowing builtins: A002 checks function definitions, and
A006 checks lambda expressions. This PR ensures that A002 is restricted
to functions rather than lambda expressions.
Closes#14135 .
FURB157 suggests replacing expressions like `Decimal("123")` with
`Decimal(123)`. This PR extends the rule to cover cases where the input
string to `Decimal` can be easily transformed into an integer literal.
For example:
```python
Decimal("1__000") # fix: `Decimal(1000)`
```
Note: we do not implement the full decimal parsing logic from CPython on
the grounds that certain acceptable string inputs to the `Decimal`
constructor may be presumed purposeful on the part of the developer. For
example, as in the linked issue, `Decimal("١٢٣")` is valid and equal to
`Decimal(123)`, but we do not suggest a replacement in this case.
Closes#13807
## Summary
Like https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14063, but ensures that we
catch cases like `{1, True}` in which the items hash to the same value
despite not being identical.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13944
## Test Plan
Standard snapshot testing
flake8-simplify surprisingly only has a single test case
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR updates the fix generation logic for auto-quoting an annotation
to generate an edit even when there's a quote character present.
The logic uses the visitor pattern, maintaining it's state on where it
is and generating the string value one node at a time. This can be
considered as a specialized form of `Generator`. The state required to
maintain is whether we're currently inside a `typing.Literal` or
`typing.Annotated` because the string value in those types should not be
un-quoted i.e., `Generic[Literal["int"]]` should become
`"Generic[Literal['int']]`, the quotes inside the `Literal` should be
preserved.
Fixes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9137
## Test Plan
Add various test cases to validate this change, validate the snapshots.
There are no ecosystem changes to go through.
---------
Signed-off-by: Shaygan <hey@glyphack.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
This pull request resolves some rule thrashing identified in #12427 by
allowing for unused arguments when using `NotImplementedError` with a
variable per [this
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12427#issuecomment-2384727468).
**Note**
This feels a little heavy-handed / edge-case-prone. So, to be clear, I'm
happy to scrap this code and just update the docs to communicate that
`abstractmethod` and friends should be used in this scenario (or
similar). Just let me know what you'd like done!
fixes: #12427
## Test Plan
I added a test-case to the existing `ARG.py` file and ran...
```sh
cargo run -p ruff -- check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_unused_arguments/ARG.py --no-cache --preview --select ARG002
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Treat async generators as "await" in ASYNC100.
Fixes#13637
## Test Plan
Updated snapshot
## Summary
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9962 by allowing a
configuration setting `allowed-unused-imports`
TODO:
- [x] Figure out the correct name and place for the setting; currently,
I have added it top level.
- [x] The comparison is pretty naive. I tried using `glob::Pattern` but
couldn't get it to work in the configuration.
- [x] Add tests
- [x] Update documentations
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13545
As described in the issue, we move comments before the inner `if`
statement to before the newly constructed `elif` statement (previously
`else`).
## Summary
fix#13602
Currently, `UP043` only applies to typing.Generator, but it should also
support collections.abc.Generator.
This update ensures `UP043` correctly handles both
`collections.abc.Generator` and `collections.abc.AsyncGenerator`
### UP043
> `UP043`
> Python 3.13 introduced the ability for type parameters to specify
default values. As such, the default type arguments for some types in
the standard library (e.g., Generator, AsyncGenerator) are now optional.
> Omitting type parameters that match the default values can make the
code more concise and easier to read.
```py
Generator[int, None, None] -> Generator[int]
```
Related to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13524
Doesn't offer a valid fix, opting to instead just not offer a fix at
all. If someone points me to a good way to handle parenthesis here I'm
down to try to fix the fix separately, but it looks quite hard.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13266
Avoids false negatives for shadowed bindings that aren't actually
references to the loop variable. There are some shadowed bindings we
need to support still, e.g., `del` requires the loop variable to exist.
## Summary
The `SequenceIndexVisitor` currently does not recurse into
subexpressions of subscripts when searching for subscript accesses that
would trigger this rule. That means that we don't currently detect
violations of the rule on snippets like this:
```py
data = {"a": 1, "b": 2}
column_names = ["a", "b"]
for index, column_name in enumerate(column_names):
_ = data[column_names[index]]
```
Fixes#13183
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p ruff_linter`
## Summary
Extends deletions for RUF100, deleting trailing text from noqa
directives, while preserving upcoming comments on the same line if any.
In cases where it deletes a comment up to another comment on the same
line, the whitespace between them is now shown to be in the autofix in
the diagnostic as well. Leading whitespace before the removed comment is
not, though.
Fixes#12251
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
As suggested by @MichaReiser in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12886#pullrequestreview-2237679793,
this adds an exemption to `RUF027` for `fastAPI` paths, which require
template strings rather than eagerly evaluated f-strings.
## Test Plan
I added a fixture that causes Ruff to emit a false-positive error on
`main` but no longer does with this PR.
This adds the `fast-api-unused-path-parameter` lint rule, as described
in #12632.
I'm still pretty new to rust, so the code can probably be improved, feel
free to tell me if there's any changes i should make.
Also, i needed to add the `add_parameter` edit function, not sure if it
was in the scope of the PR or if i should've made another one.
List and set comprehensions using `async for` cannot be replaced with
underlying generators; this PR modifies C419 to skip such
comprehensions.
Closes#12891.
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug in the semantic model where it would evaluate the
default parameter value in the type parameter scope. For example,
```py
def foo[T1: int](a = T1):
pass
```
Here, the `T1` in `a = T1` is undefined but Ruff doesn't flag it
(https://play.ruff.rs/ba2f7c2f-4da6-417e-aa2a-104aa63e6d5e).
The fix here is to evaluate the default parameter value in the
_enclosing_ scope instead.
## Test Plan
Add a test case which includes the above code under `F821`
(`undefined-name`) and validate the snapshot.
In most cases we should suggest a ternary operator, but there are three
edge cases where a binary operator is more appropriate.
Given an if-else block of the form
```python
if test:
target_var = body_value
else:
target_var = else_value
```
This PR updates the check for SIM108 to the following:
- If `test == body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace with
`target_var = test or else_value`
- If `test == not body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace
with `target_var = body_value and else_value`
- If `not test == body_value` and preview enabled, suggest to replace
with `target_var = body_value and else_value`
- Otherwise, suggest to replace with `target_var = body_value if test
else else_value`
Closes#12189.
## Summary
Adding parentheses to a tuple in a subscript with elements that include
slice expressions causes a syntax error. For example, `d[(1,2,:)]` is a
syntax error.
So, when `lint.ruff.parenthesize-tuple-in-subscript = true` and the
tuple includes a slice expression, we skip this check and fix.
Closes#12766.
Implements the new fixable lint rule `RUF031` which checks for the use or omission of parentheses around tuples in subscripts, depending on the setting `lint.ruff.parenthesize-tuple-in-getitem`. By default, the use of parentheses is considered a violation.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Resolves#12636
Consider docstrings which begin with the word "Returns" as having
satisfactorily documented they're returns. For example
```python
def f():
"""Returns 1."""
return 1
```
is valid.
## Test Plan
Added example to test fixture.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
Removes set comprehension as a violation for `sum` when checking `C419`,
because set comprehension may de-duplicate entries in a generator,
thereby modifying the value of the sum.
Closes#12690.
## Summary
Make it a violation of `C409` to call `tuple` with a list or set
comprehension, and
implement the (unsafe) fix of calling the `tuple` with the underlying
generator instead.
Closes#12648.
## Test Plan
Test fixture updated, cargo test, docs checked for updated description.
## Summary
Fixes#12630.
DOC501 and DOC502 now understand functions with constructs like this to
be explicitly raising `TypeError` (which should be documented in a
function's docstring):
```py
try:
foo():
except TypeError:
...
raise
```
I made an exception for `Exception` and `BaseException`, however.
Constructs like this are reasonably common, and I don't think anybody
would say that it's worth putting in the docstring that it raises "some
kind of generic exception":
```py
try:
foo()
except BaseException:
do_some_logging()
raise
```
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p ruff_linter --lib`
## Summary
Please see
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12605#discussion_r1699957443 for
a description of the issue.
They way I fixed it is to get the *last* timeout item in the `with`, and
if it's an `async with` and there are items after it, then don't trigger
the lint.
## Test Plan
Updated the fixture with some more cases.
## Summary
There's still a problem here. Given:
```python
class Class():
pass
# comment
# another comment
a = 1
```
We only add one newline before `a = 1` on the first pass, because
`max_precedling_blank_lines` is 1... We then add the second newline on
the second pass, so it ends up in the right state, but the logic is
clearly wonky.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11508.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Extend `flake8-builtins` to imports, lambda-arguments, and modules to be
consistent with original checker
[flake8_builtins](https://github.com/gforcada/flake8-builtins/blob/main/flake8_builtins.py).
closes#12540
## Details
- Implement builtin-import-shadowing (A004)
- Stop tracking imports shadowing in builtin-variable-shadowing (A001)
in preview mode.
- Implement builtin-lambda-argument-shadowing (A005)
- Implement builtin-module-shadowing (A006)
- Add new option `linter.flake8_builtins.builtins_allowed_modules`
## Test Plan
cargo test
## Summary
If an import is marked as "required", we should never flag it as unused.
In practice, this is rare, since required imports are typically used for
`__future__` annotations, which are always considered "used".
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12458.
## Summary
Right now, in the isort comment model, there's nowhere for trailing
comments on the _statement_ to go, as in:
```python
from mylib import (
MyClient,
MyMgmtClient,
) # some comment
```
If the comment is on the _alias_, we do preserve it, because we attach
it to the alias, as in:
```python
from mylib import (
MyClient,
MyMgmtClient, # some comment
)
```
Similarly, if the comment is trailing on an import statement
(non-`from`), we again attach it to the alias, because it can't be
parenthesized, as in:
```python
import foo # some comment
```
This PR adds logic to track and preserve those trailing comments.
We also no longer drop several other comments, like:
```python
from mylib import (
# some comment
MyClient
)
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12487.
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug to raise a syntax error when an unparenthesized
generator expression is used as an argument to a call when there are
more than one argument.
For reference, the grammar is:
```
primary:
| ...
| primary genexp
| primary '(' [arguments] ')'
| ...
genexp:
| '(' ( assignment_expression | expression !':=') for_if_clauses ')'
```
The `genexp` requires the parenthesis as mentioned in the grammar. So,
the grammar for a call expression is either a name followed by a
generator expression or a name followed by a list of argument. In the
former case, the parenthesis are excluded because the generator
expression provides them while in the later case, the parenthesis are
explicitly provided for a list of arguments which means that the
generator expression requires it's own parenthesis.
This was discovered in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12420.
## Test Plan
Add test cases for valid and invalid syntax.
Make sure that the parser from CPython also raises this at the parsing
step:
```console
$ python3.13 -m ast parser/_.py
File "parser/_.py", line 1
total(1, 2, x for x in range(5), 6)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Generator expression must be parenthesized
$ python3.13 -m ast parser/_.py
File "parser/_.py", line 1
sum(x for x in range(10), 10)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Generator expression must be parenthesized
```
## Summary
Fix panic reported in #12428. Where a string would sometimes get split
within a character boundary. This bypasses the need to split the string.
This does not guarantee the correct formatting of the docstring, but
neither did the previous implementation.
Resolves#12428
## Test Plan
Test case added to fixture
## Summary
These are the first rules implemented as part of #458, but I plan to
implement more.
Specifically, this implements `docstring-missing-exception` which checks
for raised exceptions not documented in the docstring, and
`docstring-extraneous-exception` which checks for exceptions in the
docstring not present in the body.
## Test Plan
Test fixtures added for both google and numpy style.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This PR updates D301 rule to allow inclduing escaped docstring, e.g.
`\"""Foo.\"""` or `\"\"\"Bar.\"\"\"`, within a docstring.
Related issue: #12152
## Test Plan
Add more test cases to D301.py and update the snapshot file.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
This PR allows us to fix both expressions in `foo == "a" or foo == "b"
or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar)`, but limits the rule to consecutive
comparisons, following https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7797.
I think this logic was _probably_ added because of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12368 -- the intent being that
we'd replace the _entire_ expression.
## Summary
Add new rule and implement for `unnecessary default type arguments`
under the `UP` category (`UP043`).
```py
// < py313
Generator[int, None, None]
// >= py313
Generator[int]
```
I think that as Python 3.13 develops, there might be more default type
arguments added besides `Generator` and `AsyncGenerator`. So, I made
this more flexible to accommodate future changes.
related issue: #12286
## Test Plan
snapshot included..!
## Summary
Pretty sure this should still be an error, but also, I think I added
this because of ecosystem CI? So want to see what pops up.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12164.
## Summary
I believe these should always bind more tightly -- e.g., in:
```python
for _ in bar(baz for foo in [1]):
pass
```
The inner `baz` and `foo` should be considered comprehension variables,
not for loop bindings.
We need to revisit this more holistically. In some of these cases,
`BindingKind` should probably be a flag, not an enum, since the values
aren't mutually exclusive. Separately, we should probably be more
precise in how we set it (e.g., by passing down from the parent rather
than sniffing in `handle_node_store`).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12339
## Summary
Ensures that, e.g., the following is not considered a
redefinition-without-use:
```python
import contextlib
foo = None
with contextlib.suppress(ImportError):
from some_module import foo
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12309.
## Summary
Update the name of `ASYNC109` to match
[upstream](https://flake8-async.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rules.html).
Also update to the functionality to match upstream by supporting
additional context managers from `asyncio` and `anyio`. This doesn't
change any of the detection functionality, but recommends additional
context managers from `asyncio` and `anyio` depending on context.
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12039.
## Test Plan
Added fixture for asyncio recommendation
## Summary
S113 exists because `requests` doesn't have a default timeout, so
request without timeout may hang indefinitely
> B113: Test for missing requests timeout
This plugin test checks for requests or httpx calls without a timeout
specified.
>
> Nearly all production code should use this parameter in nearly all
requests, **Failure to do so can cause your program to hang
indefinitely.**
But httpx has default timeout 5s, so S113 for httpx request without
`timeout` argument is a false positive, only valid case would be
`timeout=None`.
https://www.python-httpx.org/advanced/timeouts/
> HTTPX is careful to enforce timeouts everywhere by default.
>
> The default behavior is to raise a TimeoutException after 5 seconds of
network inactivity.
## Test Plan
snap updated
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This is the implementation for the new rule of `pycodestyle (E204)`. It
follows the guidlines described in the contributing site, and as such it
has a new file named `whitespace_after_decorator.rs`, a new test file
called `E204.py`, and as such invokes the `function` in the `AST
statement checker` for functions and functions in classes. Linking #2402
because it has all the pycodestyle rules.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
The file E204.py, has a `decorator` defined called wrapper, and this
decorator is used for 2 cases. The first one is when a `function` which
has a `decorator` is called in the file, and the second one is when
there is a `class` and 2 `methods` are defined for the `class` with a
`decorator` attached it.
Test file:
``` python
def foo(fun):
def wrapper():
print('before')
fun()
print('after')
return wrapper
# No error
@foo
def bar():
print('bar')
# E204
@ foo
def baz():
print('baz')
class Test:
# No error
@foo
def bar(self):
print('bar')
# E204
@ foo
def baz(self):
print('baz')
```
I am still new to rust and any suggestion is appreciated. Specially with
the way im using native ruff utilities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Bandit now also reports `B113` on `httpx`
(https://github.com/PyCQA/bandit/pull/1060). This PR implements the same
logic, to detect missing or `None` timeouts for `httpx` alongside
`requests`.
## Test Plan
Snapshot tests.
## Summary
This PR updates the linter, specifically the token-based rules, to work
on the tokens that come after a syntax error.
For context, the token-based rules only diagnose the tokens up to the
first lexical error. This PR builds up an error resilience by
introducing a `TokenIterWithContext` which updates the `nesting` level
and tries to reflect it with what the lexer is seeing. This isn't 100%
accurate because if the parser recovered from an unclosed parenthesis in
the middle of the line, the context won't reduce the nesting level until
it sees the newline token at the end of the line.
resolves: #11915
## Test Plan
* Add test cases for a bunch of rules that are affected by this change.
* Run the fuzzer for a long time, making sure to fix any other bugs.
## Summary
This PR updates Ruff to **not** generate auto-fixes if the source code
contains syntax errors as determined by the parser.
The main motivation behind this is to avoid infinite autofix loop when
the token-based rules are run over any source with syntax errors in
#11950.
Although even after this, it's not certain that there won't be an
infinite autofix loop because the logic might be incorrect. For example,
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12094 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12136.
This requires updating the test infrastructure to not validate for fix
availability status when the source contained syntax errors. This is
required because otherwise the fuzzer might fail as it uses the test
function to run the linter and validate the source code.
resolves: #11455
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
This PR updates various references in the linter to compute the
line-width for summing the width of each `char` in a `str` instead of
computing the width of the `str` itself.
Refer to #12133 for more details.
fixes: #12130
## Test Plan
Add a file with null (`\0`) character which is zero-width. Run this test
case on `main` to make sure it panics and switch over to this branch to
make sure it doesn't panic now.
## Summary
Use the following to reproduce this:
```console
$ cargo run -- check --select=E275,E203 --preview --no-cache ~/playground/ruff/src/play.py --fix
debug error: Failed to converge after 100 iterations in `/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/play.py` with rule codes E275:---
yield,x
---
/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/play.py:1:1: E275 Missing whitespace after keyword
|
1 | yield,x
| ^^^^^ E275
|
= help: Added missing whitespace after keyword
Found 101 errors (100 fixed, 1 remaining).
[*] 1 fixable with the `--fix` option.
```
## Test Plan
Add a test case and run `cargo insta test`.
## Summary
Implement mutable-contextvar-default (B039) which was added to
flake8-bugbear in https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear/pull/476.
This rule is similar to [mutable-argument-default
(B006)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/mutable-argument-default) and
[function-call-in-default-argument
(B008)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/function-call-in-default-argument),
except that it checks the `default` keyword argument to
`contextvars.ContextVar`.
```
B039.py:19:26: B039 Do not use mutable data structures for ContextVar defaults
|
18 | # Bad
19 | ContextVar("cv", default=[])
| ^^ B039
20 | ContextVar("cv", default={})
21 | ContextVar("cv", default=list())
|
= help: Replace with `None`; initialize with `.set()` after checking for `None`
```
In the upstream flake8-plugin, this rule is written expressly as a
corollary to B008 and shares much of its logic. Likewise, this
implementation reuses the logic of the Ruff implementation of B008,
namely
f765d19402/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/function_call_in_argument_default.rs (L104-L106)
and
f765d19402/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/mutable_argument_default.rs (L106)
Thus, this rule deliberately replicates B006's and B008's heuristics.
For example, this rule assumes that all functions are mutable unless
otherwise qualified. If improvements are to be made to B039 heuristics,
they should probably be made to B006 and B008 as well (whilst trying to
match the upstream implementation).
This rule does not have an autofix as it is unknown where the ContextVar
next used (and it might not be within the same file).
Closes#12054
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
## Summary
This adds a fix for the `duplicate-bases` rule that removes the
duplicate base from the class definition.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run duplicate_bases`, `cargo insta review`.
## Summary
This PR updates the way syntax errors are handled throughout the linter.
The main change is that it's now not considered as a rule which involves
the following changes:
* Update `Message` to be an enum with two variants - one for diagnostic
message and the other for syntax error message
* Provide methods on the new message enum to query information required
by downstream usages
This means that the syntax errors cannot be hidden / disabled via any
disablement methods. These are:
1. Configuration via `select`, `ignore`, `per-file-ignores`, and their
`extend-*` variants
```console
$ cargo run -- check ~/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py --extend-select=E999
--no-preview --no-cache
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.10s
Running `target/debug/ruff check /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py
--extend-select=E999 --no-preview --no-cache`
warning: Rule `E999` is deprecated and will be removed in a future
release. Syntax errors will always be shown regardless of whether this
rule is selected or not.
/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py:1:8: F401 [*] `abc` imported but
unused
|
1 | import abc
| ^^^ F401
2 | from pathlib import Path
3 | import os
|
= help: Remove unused import: `abc`
```
3. Command-line flags via `--select`, `--ignore`, `--per-file-ignores`,
and their `--extend-*` variants
```console
$ cargo run -- check ~/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py --no-cache
--config=~/playground/ruff/pyproject.toml
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.11s
Running `target/debug/ruff check /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py
--no-cache --config=/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/pyproject.toml`
warning: Rule `E999` is deprecated and will be removed in a future
release. Syntax errors will always be shown regardless of whether this
rule is selected or not.
/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py:1:8: F401 [*] `abc` imported but
unused
|
1 | import abc
| ^^^ F401
2 | from pathlib import Path
3 | import os
|
= help: Remove unused import: `abc`
```
This also means that the **output format** needs to be updated:
1. The `code`, `noqa_row`, `url` fields in the JSON output is optional
(`null` for syntax errors)
2. Other formats are changed accordingly
For each format, a new test case specific to syntax errors have been
added. Please refer to the snapshot output for the exact format for
syntax error message.
The output of the `--statistics` flag will have a blank entry for syntax
errors:
```
315 F821 [ ] undefined-name
119 [ ] syntax-error
103 F811 [ ] redefined-while-unused
```
The **language server** is updated to consider the syntax errors by
convert them into LSP diagnostic format separately.
### Preview
There are no quick fixes provided to disable syntax errors. This will
automatically work for `ruff-lsp` because the `noqa_row` field will be
`null` in that case.
<img width="772" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 14 57 08"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/67177269/aaac827e-4777-4ac8-8c68-eaf9f2c36774">
Even with `noqa` comment, the syntax error is displayed:
<img width="763" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 14 59 51"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/67177269/ba1afb68-7eaf-4b44-91af-6d93246475e2">
Rule documentation page:
<img width="1371" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 16 48 07"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/67177269/524f01df-d91f-4ac0-86cc-40e76b318b24">
## Test Plan
- [x] Disablement methods via config shows a warning
- [x] `select`, `extend-select`
- [ ] ~`ignore`~ _doesn't show any message_
- [ ] ~`per-file-ignores`, `extend-per-file-ignores`~ _doesn't show any
message_
- [x] Disablement methods via command-line flag shows a warning
- [x] `--select`, `--extend-select`
- [ ] ~`--ignore`~ _doesn't show any message_
- [ ] ~`--per-file-ignores`, `--extend-per-file-ignores`~ _doesn't show
any message_
- [x] File with syntax errors should exit with code 1
- [x] Language server
- [x] Should show diagnostics for syntax errors
- [x] Should not recommend a quick fix edit for adding `noqa` comment
- [x] Same for `ruff-lsp`
resolves: #8447
## Summary
This rule removes `PLR1701` and redirects it to `SIM101`.
In addition to that, the `SIM101` autofix has been fixed to add padding
if required.
### `PLR1701` has bugs
It also seems that the implementation of `PLR1701` is incorrect in
multiple scenarios. For example, the following code snippet:
```py
# There are two _different_ variables `a` and `b`
if isinstance(a, int) or isinstance(b, bool) or isinstance(a, float):
pass
# There's another condition `or 1`
if isinstance(self.k, int) or isinstance(self.k, float) or 1:
pass
```
is fixed to:
```py
# Fixed to only considering variable `a`
if isinstance(a, (float, int)):
pass
# The additional condition is not present in the fix
if isinstance(self.k, (float, int)):
pass
```
Playground: https://play.ruff.rs/6cfbdfb7-f183-43b0-b59e-31e728b34190
## Documentation Preview
### `PLR1701`
<img width="1397" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-25 at 11 14 40"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/67177269/779ee84d-7c4d-4bb8-a3a4-c2b23a313eba">
## Test Plan
Remove the test cases for `PLR1701`, port the padding test case to
`SIM101` and update the snapshot.
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug where Ruff would raise `E203` for f-string debug
expression. This isn't valid because whitespaces are important for debug
expressions.
fixes: #12023
## Test Plan
Add test case and make sure there are no snapshot changes.
## Summary
This PR updates `F811` rule to include assignment as possible shadowed
binding. This will fix issue: #11828 .
## Test Plan
Add a test file, F811_30.py, which includes a redefinition after an
assignment and a verified snapshot file.
## Summary
Addresses #11974 to add a `RUF` rule to replace `print` expressions in
`assert` statements with the inner message.
An autofix is available, but is considered unsafe as it changes
behaviour of the execution, notably:
- removal of the printout in `stdout`, and
- `AssertionError` instance containing a different message.
While the detection of the condition is a straightforward matter,
deciding how to resolve the print arguments into a string literal can be
a relatively subjective matter. The implementation of this PR chooses to
be as tolerant as possible, and will attempt to reformat any number of
`print` arguments containing single or concatenated strings or variables
into either a string literal, or a f-string if any variables or
placeholders are detected.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`.
## Examples
For ease of discussion, this is the diff for the tests:
```diff
# Standard Case
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print("This print is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Concatenated string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print("This print" " is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Positional arguments, string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional"
# Concatenated string literals combined with Positional arguments
# Expects:
# - single stringliteral concatenated with " " only between `print` and `is`
-assert True, print("This " "print", "is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Positional arguments, string literals with a variable
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This", print.__name__, "is not intentional.")
+assert True, f"This {print.__name__} is not intentional."
# Mixed brackets string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", 'is not intentional', """and should be removed""")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional and should be removed"
# Mixed brackets with other brackets inside
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " " and escaped brackets
-assert True, print("This print", 'is not "intentional"', """and "should" be 'removed'""")
+assert True, "This print is not \"intentional\" and \"should\" be 'removed'"
# Positional arguments, string literals with a separator
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with "|"
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep="|")
+assert True, "This print|is not intentional"
# Positional arguments, string literals with None as separator
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep=None)
+assert True, "This print is not intentional"
# Positional arguments, string literals with variable as separator, needs f-string
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "{U00A0}"
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep=U00A0)
+assert True, f"This print{U00A0}is not intentional"
# Unnecessary f-string
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print(f"This f-string is just a literal.")
+assert True, "This f-string is just a literal."
# Positional arguments, string literals and f-strings
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", f"is not {'intentional':s}")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# Positional arguments, string literals and f-strings with a separator
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "|"
-assert True, print("This print", f"is not {'intentional':s}", sep="|")
+assert True, f"This print|is not {'intentional':s}"
# A single f-string
# Expects:
# - single FString
-assert True, print(f"This print is not {'intentional':s}")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# A single f-string with a redundant separator
# Expects:
# - single FString
-assert True, print(f"This print is not {'intentional':s}", sep="|")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# Complex f-string with variable as separator
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "{U00A0}", all placeholders preserved
condition = "True is True"
maintainer = "John Doe"
-assert True, print("Unreachable due to", condition, f", ask {maintainer} for advice", sep=U00A0)
+assert True, f"Unreachable due to{U00A0}{condition}{U00A0}, ask {maintainer} for advice"
# Empty print
# Expects:
# - `msg` entirely removed from assertion
-assert True, print()
+assert True
# Empty print with separator
# Expects:
# - `msg` entirely removed from assertion
-assert True, print(sep=" ")
+assert True
# Custom print function that actually returns a string
# Expects:
@@ -100,4 +100,4 @@
# Use of `builtins.print`
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, builtins.print("This print should be removed.")
+assert True, "This print should be removed."
```
## Known Issues
The current implementation resolves all arguments and separators of the
`print` expression into a single string, be it
`StringLiteralValue::single` or a `FStringValue::single`. This:
- potentially joins together strings well beyond the ideal character
limit for each line, and
- does not preserve multi-line strings in their original format, in
favour of a single line `"...\n...\n..."` format.
These are purely formatting issues only occurring in unusual scenarios.
Additionally, the autofix will tolerate `print` calls that were
previously invalid:
```python
assert True, print("this", "should not be allowed", sep=42)
```
This will be transformed into
```python
assert True, f"this{42}should not be allowed"
```
which some could argue is an alteration of behaviour.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR removes most of the syntax errors from the test cases. This
would create noise when https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/11901 is
complete. These syntax errors are also just noise for the test itself.
## Test Plan
Update the snapshots and verify that they're still the same.
## Summary
The fix for E203 now produces the same result as ruff format in cases
where a slice ends on a colon and the closing square bracket is on the
following line.
Refers to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10973
## Test Plan
The minimal reproduction case in the ticket was added as test case
producing no error. Additional cases with multiple spaces or a tab
before the colon where added to make sure that the rule still finds
these.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This PR implements the [consider dict
items](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/user_guide/messages/convention/consider-using-dict-items.html)
rule from Pylint. Enabling this rule flags:
```python
ORCHESTRA = {
"violin": "strings",
"oboe": "woodwind",
"tuba": "brass",
"gong": "percussion",
}
for instrument in ORCHESTRA:
print(f"{instrument}: {ORCHESTRA[instrument]}")
for instrument in ORCHESTRA.keys():
print(f"{instrument}: {ORCHESTRA[instrument]}")
for instrument in (inline_dict := {"foo": "bar"}):
print(f"{instrument}: {inline_dict[instrument]}")
```
For not using `items()` to extract the value out of the dict. We ignore
the case of an assignment, as you can't modify the underlying
representation with the value in the list of tuples returned.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
`cargo test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug where the checker would require the tokens for an
invalid offset w.r.t. the source code.
Taking the source code from the linked issue as an example:
```py
relese_version :"0.0is 64"
```
Now, this isn't really a valid type annotation but that's what this PR
is fixing. Regardless of whether it's valid or not, Ruff shouldn't
panic.
The checker would visit the parsed type annotation (`0.0is 64`) and try
to detect any violations. Certain rule logic requests the tokens for the
same but it would fail because the lexer would only have the `String`
token considering original source code. This worked before because the
lexer was invoked again for each rule logic.
The solution is to store the parsed type annotation on the checker if
it's in a typing context and use the tokens from that instead if it's
available. This is enforced by creating a new API on the checker to get
the tokens.
But, this means that there are two ways to get the tokens via the
checker API. I want to restrict this in a follow-up PR (#11741) to only
expose `tokens` and `comment_ranges` as methods and restrict access to
the parsed source code.
fixes: #11736
## Test Plan
- [x] Add a test case for `F632` rule and update the snapshot
- [x] Check all affected rules
- [x] No ecosystem changes
## Summary
Ensures that we respect per-file ignores and exemptions for these rules.
Specifically, we allow:
```python
# ruff: noqa: PGH004
```
...to ignore `PGH004`.
## Summary
Should resolve https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11454.
This is my first PR to `ruff`, so I may have missed something.
If I understood the suggestion in the issue correctly, rule `PGH004`
should be set to `Preview` again.
## Test Plan
Created two fixtures derived from the issue.
## Summary
This PR implements the rule B901, which is part of the opinionated rules
of `flake8-bugbear`.
This rule seems to be desired in `ruff` as per
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/3758 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/2954#issuecomment-1441162976.
## Test Plan
As this PR was made closely following the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](8a25531a71/CONTRIBUTING.md),
it tests using the snapshot approach, that is described there.
## Sources
The implementation is inspired by [the original implementation in the
`flake8-bugbear`
repository](d1aec4cbef/bugbear.py (L1092)).
The error message and [test
file](d1aec4cbef/tests/b901.py)
where also copied from there.
The documentation I came up with on my own and needs improvement. Maybe
the example given in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/2954#issuecomment-1441162976
could be used, but maybe they are too complex, I'm not sure.
## Open Questions
- [ ] Documentation. (See above.)
- [x] Can I access the parent in a visitor?
The [original
implementation](d1aec4cbef/bugbear.py (L1100))
references the `yield` statement's parent to check if it is an
expression statement. I didn't find a way to do this in `ruff` and used
the `is_expresssion_statement` field on the visitor instead. What are
your thoughts on this? Is it possible and / or desired to access the
parent node here?
- [x] Is `Option::is_some(...)` -> `...unwrap()` the right thing to do?
Referring to [this piece of
code](9d5a280f71/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/return_x_in_generator.rs?plain=1#L91-L96).
From my understanding, the `.unwrap()` is safe, because it is checked
that `return_` is not `None`. However, I feel like I missed a more
elegant solution that does both in one.
## Other
I don't know a lot about this rule, I just implemented it because I
found it in a
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/labels/good%20first%20issue.
I'm new to Rust, so any constructive critisism is appreciated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
In an `__init__.py` file, it's not uncommon to lack a logical indent
(since it may just contain imports). In such cases, we were always
falling back to four-space indent. This PR adds detection for indents
within import groups.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11606.
## Summary
- Implements `Y066` from `flake8-pyi` as `PYI066`
- Fixes `PYI006` not being raised for `elif` clauses. This would have
conflicted with PYI006's implementation, so decided to do it in the same
PR.
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`
InSync
Harutaka Kawamura
Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos
Dylan
Alex Waygood
Thibaut Decombe
ABDULRAHMAN ALRAHMA
Wei Lee
Dhruv Manilawala
Brent Westbrook
Lokejoke
Matt Ord
Micha Reiser
Tzu-ping Chung
Simon Brugman
David Salvisberg
Alexandra Valentine-Ketchum
Charlie Marsh
David Salvisberg
konsti
Steve C
Shaygan Hooshyari
w0nder1ng
Randolf Scholz
Matthew Spero
Zanie Blue
Santhosh Solomon
Sid
Aleksei Latyshev
Simon Høxbro Hansen
cake-monotone
ukyen
Vince van Noort
yahayaohinoyi
Auguste Lalande
Lucas Vieira dos Santos
Tom Kuson
Adam Kuhn
Calum Young
Ken Baskett
TomerBin
Daniel Sonbolian
Matthieu LAURENT
Jonathan Plasse
epenet
Ran Benita
Mateusz Sokół
Tim Chan
Matthias
Trim21
Javier Kauer
Mathieu Kniewallner
Gilles Peiffer
Denny Wong
Philipp Thiel
Embers-of-the-Fire
Max Muoto
Alex
Tushar Sadhwani
Tobias Fischer
Tomas R