## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8921, we changed our parameter
formatting behavior to add a trailing comma whenever a single-argument
function breaks. This introduced a deviation in the case that a function
contains a single argument, but _also_ includes a positional-only or
keyword-only separator.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9074.
## Summary
Fixes#8863 : Detect asyncio-dangling-task (RUF006) when discarding
return value
## Test Plan
added new two testcases, changed result of an old one that was made more
specific
## Summary
Fix a couple typos:
- I'm certain about `It's is` → `It is`.
- Not sure about `is it's` → `if it's` because I don't understand the
sentence.
## Test Plan
No tests.
## Summary
This PR updates the logic for `is_magic_cell` to include certain cell
magics. These cell magics would contain Python code following the line
defining the command. The code could define a variable which can then be
referenced in other cells. Currently, we would ignore the cell
completely leading to undefined-name violation.
As discussed in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8354#issuecomment-1832221009
## Test Plan
Add new test case to validate this scenario.
(This is not possible to actually use until
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8854 is merged.)
This commit slots in support for formatting Markdown fenced code
blocks[1]. With the refactoring done for reStructuredText previously,
this ended up being pretty easy to add. Markdown code blocks are also
quite a bit easier to parse and recognize correctly.
One point of contention in #8860 is whether to assume that unlabeled
Markdown code fences are Python or not by default. In this PR, we make
such an assumption. This follows what `rustdoc` does. The mitigation
here is that if an unlabeled code block isn't Python, then it probably
won't parse as Python. And we'll end up skipping it. So in the vast
majority of cases, the worst thing that can happen is a little bit of
wasted work.
Closes#8860
[1]: https://spec.commonmark.org/0.30/#fenced-code-blocks
## Summary
It's common to interleave a `sys.path` modification between imports at
the top of a file. This is a frequent cause of `# noqa: E402` false
positives, as seen in the ecosystem checks. This PR modifies E402 to
omit such modifications when determining the "import boundary".
(We could consider linting against `sys.path` modifications, but that
should be a separate rule.)
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5557.
## Summary
This PR introduces a new `StringLike` enum which is a narrow type to
indicate string-like nodes. These includes the string literals, bytes
literals, and the literal parts of f-strings.
The main motivation behind this is to avoid repetition of rule calling
in the AST checker. We add a new `analyze::string_like` function which
takes in the enum and calls all the respective rule functions which
expects atleast 2 of the variants of this enum.
I'm open to discarding this if others think it's not that useful at this
stage as currently only 3 rules require these nodes.
As suggested
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8835#discussion_r1414746934)
and
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8835#discussion_r1414750204).
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Rebase of #6365 authored by @davidszotten.
## Summary
This PR updates the AST structure for an f-string elements.
The main **motivation** behind this change is to have a dedicated node
for the string part of an f-string. Previously, the existing
`ExprStringLiteral` node was used for this purpose which isn't exactly
correct. The `ExprStringLiteral` node should include the quotes as well
in the range but the f-string literal element doesn't include the quote
as it's a specific part within an f-string. For example,
```python
f"foo {x}"
# ^^^^
# This is the literal part of an f-string
```
The introduction of `FStringElement` enum is helpful which represent
either the literal part or the expression part of an f-string.
### Rule Updates
This means that there'll be two nodes representing a string depending on
the context. One for a normal string literal while the other is a string
literal within an f-string. The AST checker is updated to accommodate
this change. The rules which work on string literal are updated to check
on the literal part of f-string as well.
#### Notes
1. The `Expr::is_literal_expr` method would check for
`ExprStringLiteral` and return true if so. But now that we don't
represent the literal part of an f-string using that node, this improves
the method's behavior and confines to the actual expression. We do have
the `FStringElement::is_literal` method.
2. We avoid checking if we're in a f-string context before adding to
`string_type_definitions` because the f-string literal is now a
dedicated node and not part of `Expr`.
3. Annotations cannot use f-string so we avoid changing any rules which
work on annotation and checks for `ExprStringLiteral`.
## Test Plan
- All references of `Expr::StringLiteral` were checked to see if any of
the rules require updating to account for the f-string literal element
node.
- New test cases are added for rules which check against the literal
part of an f-string.
- Check the ecosystem results and ensure it remains unchanged.
## Performance
There's a performance penalty in the parser. The reason for this remains
unknown as it seems that the generated assembly code is now different
for the `__reduce154` function. The reduce function body is just popping
the `ParenthesizedExpr` on top of the stack and pushing it with the new
location.
- The size of `FStringElement` enum is the same as `Expr` which is what
it replaces in `FString::format_spec`
- The size of `FStringExpressionElement` is the same as
`ExprFormattedValue` which is what it replaces
I tried reducing the `Expr` enum from 80 bytes to 72 bytes but it hardly
resulted in any performance gain. The difference can be seen here:
- Original profile: https://share.firefox.dev/3Taa7ES
- Profile after boxing some node fields:
https://share.firefox.dev/3GsNXpD
### Backtracking
I tried backtracking the changes to see if any of the isolated change
produced this regression. The problem here is that the overall change is
so small that there's only a single checkpoint where I can backtrack and
that checkpoint results in the same regression. This checkpoint is to
revert using `Expr` to the `FString::format_spec` field. After this
point, the change would revert back to the original implementation.
## Review process
The review process is similar to #7927. The first set of commits update
the node structure, parser, and related AST files. Then, further commits
update the linter and formatter part to account for the AST change.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Szotten <davidszotten@gmail.com>
## Summary
Occasionally, valid code needs to use `argparse._SubParsersAction` in a
type annotation. This isn't great, but it's indicative of the fact that
public interfaces can return private types. If you accessed that private
type via a private interface, then we should be flagging the call site,
rather than the annotation.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9013.
## Summary
This PR updates the `ANN201`, `ANN202`, `ANN205`, and `ANN206` rules to
not create a fix for the return type when it's an abstract method and
the function body is empty i.e., it only contains either a pass
statement, docstring or an ellipsis literal.
fixes: #9004
## Test Plan
Add the following test cases:
- Abstract method with pass statement
- Abstract method with docstring
- Abstract method with ellipsis literal
- Abstract method with possible return type
## Summary
Add a release's version number to the names of archives containing
binaries that are attached to that GitHub release.
This makes it possible for users to easily tell archives from different
downloaded releases apart.
See also: #8961
## Test Plan
The workflow was tested in my fork. The example release can be found at:
[https://github.com/tobbez/ruff/releases/tag/v0.1.7](https://github.com/tobbez/ruff/releases/tag/v0.1.7).
To allow the workflow run to succeed in the fork while testing, I had to
use a small commit to prevent interaction with external services (ghcr,
PyPI, and the ruff-pre-commit repository):
```diff
diff --git a/.github/workflows/release.yaml b/.github/workflows/release.yaml
index 86eac6ebc..56b9fa908 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/release.yaml
+++ b/.github/workflows/release.yaml
@@ -463,10 +463,12 @@ jobs:
id-token: write
steps:
- uses: actions/download-artifact@v3
+ if: false
with:
name: wheels
path: wheels
- name: Publish to PyPi
+ if: false
uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1
with:
skip-existing: true
@@ -517,6 +519,7 @@ jobs:
tag_name: v${{ inputs.tag }}
docker-publish:
+ if: false
# This action doesn't need to wait on any other task, it's easy to re-tag if something failed and we're validating
# the tag here also
name: Push Docker image ghcr.io/astral-sh/ruff
@@ -575,6 +578,7 @@ jobs:
# After the release has been published, we update downstream repositories
# This is separate because if this fails the release is still fine, we just need to do some manual workflow triggers
update-dependents:
+ if: false
name: Update dependents
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: publish-release
```
Those workflow jobs are however not modified by this PR, so they should
not be affected.
(This is not possible to actually use until
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8854 is merged.)
ruff_python_formatter: add reStructuredText docstring formatting support
This commit makes use of the refactoring done in prior commits to slot
in reStructuredText support. Essentially, we add a new type of code
example and look for *both* literal blocks and code block directives.
Literal blocks are treated as Python by default because it seems to be a
[common
practice](https://github.com/adamchainz/blacken-docs/issues/195).
That is, literal blocks like this:
```
def example():
"""
Here's an example::
foo( 1 )
All done.
"""
pass
```
Will get reformatted. And code blocks (via reStructuredText directives)
will also get reformatted:
```
def example():
"""
Here's an example:
.. code-block:: python
foo( 1 )
All done.
"""
pass
```
When looking for a code block, it is possible for it to become invalid.
In which case, we back out of looking for a code example and print the
lines out as they are. As with doctest formatting, if reformatting the
code would result in invalid Python or if the code collected from the
block is invalid, then formatting is also skipped.
A number of tests have been added to check both the formatting and
resetting behavior. Mixed indentation is also tested a fair bit, since
one of my initial attempts at dealing with mixed indentation ended up
not working.
I recommend working through this PR commit-by-commit. There is in
particular a somewhat gnarly refactoring before reST support is added.
Closes#8859
This PR renames the semantic model flag `LITERAL` to `TYPING_LITERAL` to
better reflect its purpose. The main motivation behind this change is to
avoid any confusion with the "literal" terminology used in the AST for
literal nodes like string, bytes, numbers, etc.
