## Summary
This PR moves the `Q003` rule to AST checker.
This is the final rule that used the docstring detection state machine
and thus this PR removes it as well.
resolves: #7595resolves: #7808
## Test Plan
- [x] `cargo test`
- [x] Make sure there are no changes in the ecosystem
## Summary
Adds more aggressive logic to PLR1730, `if-stmt-min-max`
Closes#10907
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Hi! 👋
Thanks for sharing ruff as software libre — it helps me keep Python code
quality up with pre-commit, both locally and CI 🙏
While studying the examples at
https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/function-uses-loop-variable/#example I
noticed that the last of the examples had a bug: prior to this fix, `ì`
was passed to the lambda for `x` rather than for `i` — the two are
mixed-up. The reason it's easy to overlook is because addition is an
commutative operation and so `x + i` and `i + x` give the same result
(and least with integers), despite the mix-up. For proof, let me demo
the relevant part with before and after:
```python
In [1]: from functools import partial
In [2]: [partial(lambda x, i: (x, i), i)(123) for i in range(3)]
Out[2]: [(0, 123), (1, 123), (2, 123)]
In [3]: [partial(lambda x, i: (x, i), i=i)(123) for i in range(3)]
Out[3]: [(123, 0), (123, 1), (123, 2)]
```
Does that make sense?
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Was manually tested using IPython.
CC @r4f @grandchild
## Summary
If `RUF100` was included in a per-file-ignore, we respected it on cases
like `# noqa: F401`, but not the blanket variant (`# noqa`).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10906.
## Summary
Implement new rule: Prefer augmented assignment (#8877). It checks for
the assignment statement with the form of `<expr> = <expr>
<binary-operator> …` with a unsafe fix to use augmented assignment
instead.
## Test Plan
1. Snapshot test is included in the PR.
2. Manually test with playground.
## Summary
This PR adds the implementation for the current
[flake8-bugbear](https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear)'s B038 rule.
The B038 rule checks for mutation of loop iterators in the body of a for
loop and alerts when found.
Rational:
Editing the loop iterator can lead to undesired behavior and is probably
a bug in most cases.
Closes#9511.
Note there will be a second iteration of B038 implemented in
`flake8-bugbear` soon, and this PR currently only implements the weakest
form of the rule.
I'd be happy to also implement the further improvements to B038 here in
ruff 🙂
See https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear/issues/454 for more
information on the planned improvements.
## Test Plan
Re-using the same test file that I've used for `flake8-bugbear`, which
is included in this PR (look for the `B038.py` file).
Note: this is my first time using `rust` (beside `rustlings`) - I'd be
very happy about thorough feedback on what I could've done better
🙂 - Bring it on 😀
## Summary
Code cleanup for per-file ignores; use a struct instead of a tuple.
Named the structs for individual ignores and the list of ignores
`CompiledPerFileIgnore` and `CompiledPerFileIgnoreList`. Name choice is
because we already have a `PerFileIgnore` struct for a
pre-compiled-matchers form of the config. Name bikeshedding welcome.
## Test Plan
Refactor, should not change behavior; existing tests pass.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <alex.waygood@gmail.com>
## Summary
Implement `write-whole-file` (`FURB103`), part of #1348. This is largely
a copy and paste of `read-whole-file` #7682.
## Test Plan
Text fixture added.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
Improve `blanket-noqa` error message in cases where codes are provided
but not detected due to formatting issues. Namely `# noqa X100` (missing
colon) or `noqa : X100` (space before colon). The behavior is similar to
`NQA002` and `NQA003` from `flake8-noqa` mentioned in #850. The idea to
merge the rules into `PGH004` was suggested by @MichaReiser
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10325#issuecomment-2025535444.
## Test Plan
Test cases added to fixture.
Fixes#3172
## Summary
Allow prefixing [extend-]per-file-ignores patterns with `!` to negate
the pattern; listed rules / prefixes will be ignored in all files that
don't match the pattern.
## Test Plan
Added tests for the feature.
Rendered docs and checked rendered output.
## Summary
Came across this code while digging into the semantic model with
@AlexWaygood, and found it confusing because of how it splits
`push_scope` from the paired `pop_scope` (took me a few minutes to even
figure out if/where we were popping the pushed scope). Since this
"cleanup" is already totally split by node type, there doesn't seem to
be any gain in having it as a separate "step" rather than just
incorporating it into the traversal clauses for those node types.
I left the equivalent cleanup step alone for the expression case,
because in that case it is actually generic across several different
node types, and due to the use of the common `visit_generators` utility
there isn't a clear way to keep the pushes and corresponding pops
localized.
Feel free to just reject this if I've missed a good reason for it to
stay this way!
## Test Plan
Tests and clippy.
## Summary
Fixes#3011.
Type checkers currently allow forward references in all contexts in stub
files, and stubs frequently make use of this capability (although it
doesn't actually seem to be specc'd anywhere --neither in PEP 484, nor
https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source/stubs.html#id6, nor the
CPython typing docs). Implementing it so that Ruff allows forward
references in _all contexts_ in stub files seems non-trivial, however
(or at least, I couldn't figure out how to do it easily), so this PR
does not do that. Perhaps it _should_; if we think this apporach isn't
principled enough, I'm happy to close it and postpone changing anything
here.
However, this does reduce the number of F821 errors Ruff emits on
typeshed down from 76 to 2, which would mean that we could enable the
rule at typeshed. The remaining 2 F821 errors can be trivially fixed at
typeshed by moving definitions around; forward references in class bases
were really the only remaining places where there was a real _use case_
for forward references in stub files that Ruff wasn't yet allowing.
## Test plan
`cargo test`. I also ran this PR branch on typeshed to check to see if
there were any new false positives caused by the changes here; there
were none.
## Summary
`Path.read_bytes()` does not support any keyword arguments, so `FURB101`
should not be triggered if the file is opened in `rb` mode with any
keyword arguments.
## Test Plan
Move erroneous test to "Non-error" section of fixture.
## Summary
Historically, given:
```python
__all__ = [ # noqa: F822
"Bernoulli",
"Beta",
"Binomial",
]
```
The F822 violations would be attached to the `__all__`, so this `# noqa`
would be enforced for _all_ definitions in the list. This changed in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10525 for the better, in that we
now use the range of each string. But these `# noqa` directives stopped
working.
This PR sets the `__all__` as a parent range in the diagnostic, so that
these directives are respected once again.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10795.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Add new rule `pyupgrade - UP042` (I picked next available number).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/3867
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9569
It should warn + provide a fix `class A(str, Enum)` -> `class
A(StrEnum)` for py311+.
## Test Plan
Added UP042.py test.
## Notes
I did not find a way to call `remove_argument` 2 times consecutively, so
the automatic fixing works only for classes that inherit exactly `str,
Enum` (regardless of the order).
I also plan to extend this rule to support IntEnum in next PR.
## Summary
This PR adds a new semantic model flag to indicate that the checker is
inside an f-string replacement field. This will be used to ignore
certain checks if the target version doesn't support a specific feature
like PEP 701.
fixes: #10761
## Test Plan
Add a test case from the raised issue.
Fixes#3259
## Summary
Renames `UnnecessaryComprehensionAnyAll` to
`UnnecessaryComprehensionInCall` and extends the check to `sum`, `min`,
and `max`, in addition to `any` and `all`.
## Test Plan
Updated snapshot test.
Built docs locally and verified the docs for this rule still render
correctly.
## Summary
We may not have had access to this in the past, but in short, if the
diagnostic is related to a specific section of a docstring, it seems
better to highlight the section (via the header) than the _entire_
docstring.
This should be completely compatible with existing `# noqa` since it's
always inside of a multi-line string anyway, and in such cases the `#
noqa` is always placed at the end of the multiline string.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10736.
## Summary
We lost the per-rule ignores when these were migrated to the AST, so if
_any_ `Q` rule is enabled, they're now all enabled.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10724.
## Test Plan
Ran:
```shell
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q000
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q001
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q002
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q000,Q001
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q000,Q002
ruff check . --isolated --select Q --ignore Q001,Q002
```
...against:
```python
'''
bad docsting
'''
a = 'single'
b = '''
bad multi line
'''
```
## Summary
An annotated lambda assignment within a class scope is often
intentional. For example, within a dataclass or Pydantic model, these
are treated as fields rather than methods (and so can be passed values
in constructors).
I originally wrote this to special-case dataclasses and Pydantic
models... But was left feeling like we'd see more false positives here
for little gain (an annotated lambda within a `class` is likely
intentional?). Open to opinions, though.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10718.
## Summary
Currently, [this
line](716688d44e/crates/ruff_linter/src/fix/edits.rs (L101))
assumes that the `noqa` comment begins with an octothorpe followed by a
space. (`# `) With anyone's random code, this of course is not always
true.
When there's a multi-byte character after the leading octothorpe, such
as
[`\u0085`](https://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/85/index.htm),
we try slicing from within the character, causing a panic.
To fix this, the logic has been changed to remove unused `noqa`
directives and keep any trailing comments, or removing the whole comment
if the comment is just the unused `noqa`
Fixes#10097.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Dhruv Manilawala
Steve C
Hoël Bagard
Sebastian Pipping
Charlie Marsh
wolfgangshi
Martin Imre
Carl Meyer
Auguste Lalande
Carl Meyer
Aleksei Latyshev
Alex Waygood
Tibor Reiss
Bohdan
Micha Reiser
Jane Lewis
renovate[bot]