mirror of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff
057faabcdd
## Summary This is equivalent for a single flag, but I think it's more likely to be correct when the bitflags are modified -- the primary reason being that we sometimes define flags as the union of other flags, e.g.: ```rust const ANNOTATION = Self::TYPING_ONLY_ANNOTATION.bits() | Self::RUNTIME_ANNOTATION.bits(); ``` In this case, `flags.contains(Flag::ANNOTATION)` requires that _both_ flags in the union are set, whereas `flags.intersects(Flag::ANNOTATION)` requires that _at least one_ flag is set. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| flake8_to_ruff | ||
| ruff | ||
| ruff_benchmark | ||
| ruff_cache | ||
| ruff_cli | ||
| ruff_dev | ||
| ruff_diagnostics | ||
| ruff_formatter | ||
| ruff_index | ||
| ruff_macros | ||
| ruff_python_ast | ||
| ruff_python_formatter | ||
| ruff_python_resolver | ||
| ruff_python_semantic | ||
| ruff_python_stdlib | ||
| ruff_python_trivia | ||
| ruff_rustpython | ||
| ruff_shrinking | ||
| ruff_textwrap | ||
| ruff_wasm | ||