Charlie Marsh 057faabcdd Use `Flags::intersects` rather than `Flags::contains` (#6007) ... ## Summary This is equivalent for a single flag, but I think it's more likely to be correct when the bitflags are modified -- the primary reason being that we sometimes define flags as the union of other flags, e.g.: ```rust const ANNOTATION = Self::TYPING_ONLY_ANNOTATION.bits() | Self::RUNTIME_ANNOTATION.bits(); ``` In this case, `flags.contains(Flag::ANNOTATION)` requires that _both_ flags in the union are set, whereas `flags.intersects(Flag::ANNOTATION)` requires that _at least one_ flag is set.		2023-07-23 02:59:31 +00:00
..
resources/test	Extend SIM118 with `not in` (#5995)	2023-07-23 01:46:21 +00:00
src	Use `Flags::intersects` rather than `Flags::contains` (#6007)	2023-07-23 02:59:31 +00:00
Cargo.toml	Bump version to 0.0.280 (#5965)	2023-07-21 22:36:13 -04:00