## Summary
uv will now reject ZIP files that meet any of the following conditions:
- Multiple local header entries exist for the same file with different
contents.
- A local header entry exists for a file that isn't included in the
end-of-central directory record.
- An entry exists in the end-of-central directory record that does not
have a corresponding local header.
- The ZIP file contains contents after the first end-of-central
directory record.
- The CRC32 doesn't match between the local file header and the
end-of-central directory record.
- The compressed size doesn't match between the local file header and
the end-of-central directory record.
- The uncompressed size doesn't match between the local file header and
the end-of-central directory record.
- The reported central directory offset (in the end-of-central-directory
header) does not match the actual offset.
- The reported ZIP64 end of central directory locator offset does not
match the actual offset.
We also validate the above for files with data descriptors, which we
previously ignored.
Wheels from the most recent releases of the top 15,000 packages on PyPI
have been confirmed to pass these checks, and PyPI will also reject ZIPs
under many of the same conditions (at upload time) in the future.
In rare cases, this validation can be disabled by setting
`UV_INSECURE_NO_ZIP_VALIDATION=1`. Any validations should be reported to
the uv issue tracker and to the upstream package maintainer.
Specifically, support `UV_NO_EDITABLE=1 uv export`. It's now also
supported in `uv add`, though it's default there anyway and the env var
exists only for completeness.
Fixes#15103
Close#6314
## Summary
Continuing from #7592. Created a new PR to rebase the old branch with
`main`, cleaned up test errors, and improved readability.
## Test Plan
Same test cases as in #7592.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Replaces https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14092
Adds `tool.uv.extra-build-dependencies = {package = [dependency, ...]}`
which extends `build-system.requires` during package builds.
These are lowered via workspace sources, are applied to transitive
dependencies, and are included in the wheel cache shard hash.
There are some features we need to follow-up on, but are out of scope
here:
- Preferring locked versions for build dependencies
- Settings for requiring locked versions for build depencies
There are some quality of life follow-ups we should also do:
- Warn on `extra-build-dependencies` that do not apply to any packages
- Add test cases and improve error messaging when the
`extra-build-dependencies` resolve fails
-------
There ~are~ were a few open decisions to be made here
1. Should we resolve these dependencies alongside the
`build-system.requires` dependencies? Or should we resolve separately?
(I think the latter is more powerful? because you can override things?
but it opens the door to breaking your build)
2. Should we install these dependencies into the same environment? Or
should we layer it on top as we do elsewhere? (I think it's fine to
install into the same environment)
3. Should we respect sources defined in the parent project? (I think
yes, but then we need to lower the dependencies earlier — I don't think
that's a big deal, but it's not implemented)
4. Should we respect sources defined in the child project? (I think no,
this gets really complicated and seems weird to allow)
5. Should we apply this to transitive dependencies? (I think so)
---------
Co-authored-by: Aria Desires <aria.desires@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
Adds `exclude-newer-package = { package = timestamp, ... } ` and
`--exclude-newer-package package=timestamp`. These take precedence over
`exclude-newer` for a given package.
This does need to be serialized to the lockfile, so the revision is
bumped to 3. I tested a previous version and we can read a lockfile with
this information just fine.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14394
I think this would give us better hygiene than a global flag. It makes
it easier for users to opt-in to overlapping features, such as Python
upgrades and Python bin installations and to disable warnings for
preview mode without opting in to a bunch of other features. In general,
I want to reduce the burden for putting something under preview.
The `--preview` and `--no-preview` flags are retained as global
overrides. A new `--preview-features` option is added which accepts
comma separated features or can be passed multiple times, e.g.,
`--preview-features add-bounds,pylock`. There's a `UV_PREVIEW_FEATURES`
environment variable for that option (I'm not sure if we should overload
`UV_PREVIEW`, but could be convinced).
## Summary
If `HF_TOKEN` is set, we'll automatically wire it up to authenticate
requests when hitting private `huggingface.co` URLs in `uv run`.
## Test Plan
An unauthenticated request:
```
> cargo run -- run https://huggingface.co/datasets/cmarsh/test/resolve/main/main.py
File "/var/folders/nt/6gf2v7_s3k13zq_t3944rwz40000gn/T/mainYadr5M.py", line 1
Invalid username or password.
^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
```
An authenticated request:
```
> HF_TOKEN=hf_... cargo run run https://huggingface.co/datasets/cmarsh/test/resolve/main/main.py
Hello from main.py!
```
## Summary
We don't yet support writing these, but we can at least read them
(which, e.g., allows you to install PDM-exported `pylock.toml` files
with uv, since PDM _always_ writes a default group).
Closes#14740.
By default, `uv venv <venv-name>` currently removes the `<venv-name`>
directory if it exists. This can be surprising behavior: not everyone
expects an existing environment to be overwritten. This PR updates the
default to fail if a non-empty `<venv-name>` directory already exists
and neither `--allow-existing` nor the new `-c/--clear` option is
provided (if a TTY is detected, it prompts first). If it's not a TTY,
then uv will only warn and not fail for now — we'll make this an error
in the future. I've also added a corresponding `UV_VENV_CLEAR` env var.
I've chosen to use `--clear` instead of `--force` for this option
because it is used by the `venv` module and `virtualenv` and will be
familiar to users. I also think its meaning is clearer in this context
than `--force` (which could plausibly mean force overwrite just the
virtual environment files, which is what our current `--allow-existing`
option does).
Closes#1472.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
If `--workspace` is provided, we add all paths as workspace members.
If `--no-workspace` is provided, we add all paths as direct path
dependencies.
If neither is provided, then we add any paths that are under the
workspace root as workspace members, and the rest as direct path
dependencies.
Closes#14524.
Adds environment variables for
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14612 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14614
We can't use the Clap `BoolishValueParser` here, and the reasoning is a
little hard to explain. If we used `UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_NO_BIN`, as is our
typical pattern, it'd work, but here we allow opt-in to hard errors with
`UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_BIN=1` and I don't think we should have both
`UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_BIN` and `UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_NO_BIN`.
Consequently, this pull request introduces a new `EnvironmentOptions`
abstraction which allows us to express semantics that Clap cannot —
which we probably want anyway because we have an increasing number of
environment variables we're parsing downstream, e.g., #14544 and #14369.
## Summary
When installing packages on _very_ slow/overloaded systems it'spossible
to trigger bytecode compilation timeouts, which tends to happen in
environments such as Qemu (especially without KVM/virtio), but also on
systems that are simply overloaded. I've seen this in my Nix builds if I
for example am compiling a Linux kernel at the same time as a few other
concurrent builds.
By making the bytecode compilation timeout adjustable you can work
around such issues. I plan to set `UV_COMPILE_BYTECODE_TIMEOUT=0` in the
[pyproject.nix
builders](https://pyproject-nix.github.io/pyproject.nix/build.html) to
make them more reliable.
- Related issues
* https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6105
## Test Plan
Only manual testing was applied in this instance. There is no existing
automated tests for bytecode compilation timeout afaict.
Closes#14262
## Description
Adds `UV_LIBC` environment variable and implements check within
`Libc::from_env` as recommended here:
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14262#issuecomment-3014600313
Gave this a few passes to make sure I follow dev practices within uv as
best I am able. Feel free to call out anything that could be improved.
## Test Plan
Planned to simply run existing test suite. Open to adding more tests
once implementation is validated due to my limited Rust experience.
Part of #14296
This is the same as `uv tool update-shell` but handles the case where
the Python bin directory is configured to a different path.
```
❯ UV_PYTHON_BIN_DIR=/tmp/foo cargo run -q -- python install --preview 3.13.3
Installed Python 3.13.3 in 1.75s
+ cpython-3.13.3-macos-aarch64-none
warning: `/tmp/foo` is not on your PATH. To use installed Python executables, run `export PATH="/tmp/foo:$PATH"` or `uv python update-shell`.
❯ UV_PYTHON_BIN_DIR=/tmp/foo cargo run -q -- python update-shell
Created configuration file: /Users/zb/.zshenv
Restart your shell to apply changes
❯ cat /Users/zb/.zshenv
# uv
export PATH="/tmp/foo:$PATH"
❯ UV_TOOL_BIN_DIR=/tmp/bar cargo run -q -- tool update-shell
Updated configuration file: /Users/zb/.zshenv
Restart your shell to apply changes
❯ cat /Users/zb/.zshenv
# uv
export PATH="/tmp/foo:$PATH"
# uv
export PATH="/tmp/bar:$PATH"
```
Previously, if installation of executables into the bin directory failed
we'd with a non-zero code. However, if we make this behavior the default
we don't want it to be fatal. There's a `--bin` opt-in to _require_
successful executable installation and a `--no-bin` opt-out to silence
the warning / opt-out of installation entirely.
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14296 — we need this
before we can stabilize the behavior.
In #14614 we do the same for writing entries to the Windows registry.
This is a continuation of the work in
* #12405
I have:
* moved to an architecture where the human output is derived from the
json structs to centralize more of the printing state/logic
* cleaned up some of the names/types
* added tests
* removed the restriction that this output is --dry-run only
I have not yet added package info, which was TBD in their design.
---------
Co-authored-by: x0rw <mahdi.svt5@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Co-authored-by: John Mumm <jtfmumm@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This is a small quality of life feature that adds a shorthand (`-w`) to
the `--with` flag for minimizing keystrokes.
Pretty minor, but I didn't see any conflicts with `-w` and thought this
could be a nice place for it.
```bash
# proposed addition (short)
uvx -w numpy ipython
# original (long)
uvx --with numpy ipython
```
## Test Plan
Added testing already in the P.R. - just copied over tests from the
`--with` flag
<!-- How was it tested? -->
This adds `alpha`, `beta`, `rc`, `stable`, `post`, and `dev` modes to
`uv version --bump`.
The components that `--bump` accepts are ordered as follows:
major > minor > patch > stable > alpha > beta > rc > post > dev
Bumping a component "clears" all lesser component (`alpha`, `beta`, and
`rc` all overwrite each other):
* `--bump minor` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.3.0`
* `--bump alpha` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3a5`
* `--bump dev ` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3a4.post5.dev7`
In addition, `--bump` can now be repeated. The primary motivation of
this is "bump stable version and also enter a prerelease", but it
technically lets you express other things if you want them:
* `--bump patch --bump alpha` on `1.2.3` => `1.2.4a1` ("bump patch
version and go to alpha 1")
* `--bump minor --bump patch` on `1.2.3` => `1.3.1` ("bump minor version
and got to patch 1")
* `--bump minor --bump minor` on `1.2.3` => `1.4.0` ("bump minor version
twice")
The `--bump` flags are sorted by their priority, so that you don't need
to remember the priority yourself. This ordering is the only "useful"
one that preserves every `--bump` you passed, so there's no concern
about loss of expressiveness. For instance `--bump minor --bump major`
would just be `--bump major` if we didn't sort, as the major bump clears
the minor version. The ordering of `beta` after `alpha` means `--bump
alpha --bump beta` will just result in beta 1; this is the one case
where a bump request will effectively get overwritten.
The `stable` mode "bumps to the next stable release", clearing the pre
(`alpha`, `beta`, `rc`), `dev`, and `post` components from a version
(`1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3`). The choice to clear `post` here is a
bit odd, in that `1.2.3.post4` => `1.2.3` is actually a version
decrease, but I think this gives a more intuitive model (as preserving
`post5` in the previous example is definitely wrong), and also
post-releases are extremely obscure so probably no one will notice. In
the cases where this behaviour isn't useful, you probably wanted to pass
`--bump patch` or something anyway which *should* definitely clear the
`post5` (putting it another way: the only cases where `--bump stable`
has dubious behaviour is when you wanted it to do a noop, which, is a
command you could have just not written at all).
In all cases we preserve the "epoch" and "local" components of a
version, so the `7!` and `+local` in `7!1.2.3+local` will never be
modified by `--bump` (you can use the raw version set mode if you want
to touch those). The preservation of `local` is another slightly odd
choice, but it's a really obscure feature (so again it mostly won't come
up) and when it's used it seems to mostly be used for referring to
variant releases, in which case preserving it tends to be correct.
Fixes#13223
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Support multiple root modules in namespace packages by enumerating them:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = ["foo", "bar"]
```
This allows applications with multiple root packages without migrating
to workspaces. Since those are regular module names (we iterate over
them an process each one like a single module names), it allows
combining dotted (namespace) names and regular names. It also
technically allows combining regular and stub modules, even though this
is even less recommends.
We don't recommend this structure (please use a workspace instead, or
structure everything in one root module), but it reduces the number of
cases that need `namespace = true`.
Fixes#14435Fixes#14438
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
The uv build backend has gone through some feedback cycles, we expect no
more major configuration changes, and we're ready to take the next step:
The uv build backend in stable.
This PR stabilizes:
* Using `uv_build` as build backend
* The documentation of the uv build backend
* The direct build fast path, where uv doesn't use PEP 517 if you're
using `uv_build` in a compatible version.
* `uv build --list`, which is limited to `uv_build`.
It does not:
* Make `uv_build` the default on `uv init`
* Make `--package` the default on `uv init`
We do not currently support passing index names to `--index` for
installing packages. However, we do accept relative paths that can look
like index names. This PR adds the requirement that `--index` values
must be disambiguated with a prefix (`./` or `../` on Unix and Windows
or `.\\` or `..\\` on Windows). For now, if an ambiguous value is
provided, uv will warn that this will not be supported in the future.
Currently, if you provide an index name like `--index test` when there
is no `test` directory, uv will error with a `Directory not found...`
error. That's not very informative if you thought index names were
supported. The new warning makes the context clearer.
Closes#13921
> NOTE: The PRs that were merged into this feature branch have all been
independently reviewed. But it's also useful to see all of the changes
in their final form. I've added comments to significant changes
throughout the PR to aid discussion.
This PR introduces transparent Python version upgrades to uv, allowing
for a smoother experience when upgrading to new patch versions.
Previously, upgrading Python patch versions required manual updates to
each virtual environment. Now, virtual environments can transparently
upgrade to newer patch versions.
Due to significant changes in how uv installs and executes managed
Python executables, this functionality is initially available behind a
`--preview` flag. Once an installation has been made upgradeable through
`--preview`, subsequent operations (like `uv venv -p 3.10` or patch
upgrades) will work without requiring the flag again. This is
accomplished by checking for the existence of a minor version symlink
directory (or junction on Windows).
### Features
* New `uv python upgrade` command to upgrade installed Python versions
to the latest available patch release:
```
# Upgrade specific minor version
uv python upgrade 3.12 --preview
# Upgrade all installed minor versions
uv python upgrade --preview
```
* Transparent upgrades also occur when installing newer patch versions:
```
uv python install 3.10.8 --preview
# Automatically upgrades existing 3.10 environments
uv python install 3.10.18
```
* Support for transparently upgradeable Python `bin` installations via
`--preview` flag
```
uv python install 3.13 --preview
# Automatically upgrades the `bin` installation if there is a newer patch version available
uv python upgrade 3.13 --preview
```
* Virtual environments can still be tied to a patch version if desired
(ignoring patch upgrades):
```
uv venv -p 3.10.8
```
### Implementation
Transparent upgrades are implemented using:
* Minor version symlink directories (Unix) or junctions (Windows)
* On Windows, trampolines simulate paths with junctions
* Symlink directory naming follows Python build standalone format: e.g.,
`cpython-3.10-macos-aarch64-none`
* Upgrades are scoped to the minor version key (as represented in the
naming format: implementation-minor version+variant-os-arch-libc)
* If the context does not provide a patch version request and the
interpreter is from a managed CPython installation, the `Interpreter`
used by `uv python run` will use the full symlink directory executable
path when available, enabling transparently upgradeable environments
created with the `venv` module (`uv run python -m venv`)
New types:
* `PythonMinorVersionLink`: in a sense, the core type for this PR, this
is a representation of a minor version symlink directory (or junction on
Windows) that points to the highest installed managed CPython patch
version for a minor version key.
* `PythonInstallationMinorVersionKey`: provides a view into a
`PythonInstallationKey` that excludes the patch and prerelease. This is
used for grouping installations by minor version key (e.g., to find the
highest available patch installation for that minor version key) and for
minor version directory naming.
### Compatibility
* Supports virtual environments created with:
* `uv venv`
* `uv run python -m venv` (using managed Python that was installed or
upgraded with `--preview`)
* Virtual environments created within these environments
* Existing virtual environments from before these changes continue to
work but aren't transparently upgradeable without being recreated
* Supports both standard Python (`python3.10`) and freethreaded Python
(`python3.10t`)
* Support for transparently upgrades is currently only available for
managed CPython installations
Closes#7287Closes#7325Closes#7892Closes#9031Closes#12977
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
This allows you to specify requires-python on individual dependency-groups,
with the intended usecase being "oh my dev-dependencies have a higher
requires-python than my actual project".
This includes a large driveby move of the RequiresPython type to
uv-distribution-types to allow us to generate the appropriate markers at
this point in the code. It also migrates RequiresPython from
pubgrub::Range to version_ranges::Ranges, and makes several pub(crate)
items pub, as it's no longer defined in uv_resolver.
Fixes#11606
Unlike regular packages, specifying all `__init__.py` directories for a
namespace package would be very verbose There is e.g.
https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/tree/main/src/poetry, which has
18 modules, or https://github.com/googleapis/api-common-protos which is
inconsistently nested. For both the Google Cloud SDK, there are both
packages with a single module and those with complex structures, with
many having multiple modules due to versioning through `<module>_v1`
versioning. The Azure SDK seems to use one module per package (it's not
explicitly documented but seems to follow from the process in
https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/python_design.html#azure-sdk-distribution-packages
and
ccb0e03a3d/doc/dev/packaging.md).
For simplicity with complex projects, we add a `namespace = true` switch
which disabled checking for an `__init__.py`. We only check that there's
no `<module_root>/<module_name>/__init__.py` and otherwise add the whole
`<module_root>/<module_name>` folder. This comes at the cost of
`namespace = true` effectively creating an opt-out from our usual checks
that allows creating an almost entirely arbitrary package.
For simple projects with only a single module, the module name can be
dotted to point to the target module, so the build still gets checked:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = "poetry.core"
```
## Alternatives
### Declare all packages
We could make `module-name` a list and allow or require declaring all
packages:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = ["cloud_sdk.service.storage", "cloud_sdk.service.storage_v1", "cloud_sdk.billing.storage"]
```
Or for Poetry:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = [
"poetry.config",
"poetry.console",
"poetry.inspection",
"poetry.installation",
"poetry.json",
"poetry.layouts",
"poetry.masonry",
"poetry.mixology",
"poetry.packages",
"poetry.plugins",
"poetry.publishing",
"poetry.puzzle",
"poetry.pyproject",
"poetry.repositories",
"poetry.toml",
"poetry.utils",
"poetry.vcs",
"poetry.version"
]
```
### Support multiple namespaces
We could also allow namespace packages with multiple root level module:
```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = ["cloud_sdk.my_ext", "local_sdk.my_ext"]
```
For lack of use cases, we delegate this to creating a workspace with one
package per module.
## Implementation
Due to the more complex options for the module name, I'm moving
verification on deserialization later, dropping the source span we'd get
from serde. We also don't show similarly named directories anymore.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I follow the advices from the IDE spell checker and grammar checker, fix
some typos, and improve the docs.
Extends https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/13841 — I'll drop that
commit later after that pull request merges but it's small.
I find the split into a "Configuration" section awkward and don't think
it's helping us. Everything moved into the "Concepts" section, except
the "Environment variables" page which definitely belongs in the
reference and the "Installer" page which is fairly niche and seems
better in the reference.
Before / After
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80d8304b-17da-4900-a5f4-c3ccac96fcc5"
width="400">
This includes some initial work on adding Pyodide support (issue
#12729). It is enough to get
```
uv pip compile -p /path/to/pyodide --extra-index-url file:/path/to/simple-index
```
to work which should already be quite useful.
## Test Plan
* added a unit test for `pyodide_platform`
* integration tested manually with:
```
cargo run pip install \
-p /home/rchatham/Documents/programming/tmp/pyodide-venv-test/.pyodide-xbuildenv-0.29.3/0.27.4/xbuildenv/pyodide-root/dist/python \
--extra-index-url file:/home/rchatham/Documents/programming/tmp/pyodide-venv-test/.pyodide-xbuildenv-0.29.3/0.27.4/xbuildenv/pyodide-root/package_index \
--index-strategy unsafe-best-match --target blah --no-build \
numpy pydantic
```
---------
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Implemented as suggested in #13761
eg.
```
$ uv tool install 'harlequin[postgres]'
$ uv tool list --show-extras
harlequin v2.1.2 [extras: postgres]
- harlequin
```
## Test Plan
Added a new test with the argument along with the others from the `uv
tool list` cli.
By default, uv uses only a lower bound in `uv add`, which avoids
dependency conflicts due to upper bounds. With this PR, this cna be
changed by setting a different bound kind. The bound kind can be
configured in `uv.toml`, as a user preference, in `pyproject.toml`, as a
project preference, or on the CLI, when adding a specific project.
We add two options that add an upper bound on the constraint, one for
SemVer (`>=1.2.3,<2.0.0`, dubbed "major", modeled after the SemVer
caret) and another one for dependencies that make breaking changes in
minor version (`>=1.2.3,<1.3.0`, dubbed "minor", modeled after the
SemVer tilde). Intuitively, the major option bumps the most significant
version component, while the minor option bumps the second most
significant version component. There is also an exact bounds option
(`==1.2.3`), though generally we recommend setting a wider bound and
using the lockfile for pinning.
Versions can have leading zeroes, such as `0.1` or `0.0.1`. For a single
leading 0, we shift the the meaning of major and minor similar to cargo.
For two or more leading zeroes, the difference between major and minor
becomes inapplicable, instead both bump the most significant component:
- major: `0.1` -> `>=0.1,<0.2`
- major: `0.0.1` -> `>=0.0.1,<0.0.2`
- major: `0.0.1.1` -> `>=0.0.1.1,<0.0.2.0`
- major: `0.0.0.1` -> `>=0.0.0.1,<0.0.0.2`
- minor: `0.1` -> `>=0.1,<0.1.1`
- minor: `0.0.1` -> `>=0.0.1,<0.0.2`
- minor: `0.0.1.1` -> `>=0.0.1.1,<0.0.2.0`
- minor: `0.0.0.1` -> `>=0.0.0.1,<0.0.0.2`
For a consistent appearance, we try to preserve the number of components
in the upper bound. For example, adding a version `2.17` with the major
option is stored as `>=2.17,<3.0`. If a version uses three components
and is greater than 0, both bounds will also use three components
(SemVer versions always have three components). Of the top 100 PyPI
packages, 8 use a non-three-component version (docutils, idna, pycparser
and soupsieve with two components, packaging, pytz and tzdata with two
component, CalVer and trove-classifiers with four component CalVer).
Example `pyproject.toml` files with the top 100 packages: [`--bounds
major`](https://gist.github.com/konstin/0aaffa9ea53c4834c22759e8865409f4)
and [`--bounds
minor`](https://gist.github.com/konstin/e77f5e990a7efe8a3c8a97c5c5b76964).
While many projects follow version scheme that roughly or directly
matches the major or minor options, these compatibility ranges are
usually not applicable for the also popular CalVer versioning.
For pre-release versions, there are two framings we could take: One is
that pre-releases generally make no guarantees about compatibility
between them and are used to introduce breaking changes, so we should
pin them exactly. In many cases however, pre-release specifiers are used
because a project needs a bugfix or a feature that hasn't made it into a
stable release, or because a project is compatible with the next version
before a final version for that release is published. In those cases,
compatibility with other packages that depend on the same library is
more important, so the desired bound is the same as it would be for the
stable release, except with the lower bound lowered to include
pre-release.
The names of the bounds and the name of the flag is up for bikeshedding.
Currently, the option is call `tool.uv.bounds`, but we could also move
it under `tool.uv.edit.bounds`, where it would be the first/only entry.
Fixes#6783
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Stubs packages are different in that their name ends with `-stubs`,
their module is `<module name>-stubs` (with a dash, not the generally
legal underscore) and their modules contain a `__init__.pyi` instead of
an `__init__.py`
(https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/distributing.html#stub-only-packages).
We add support in the uv build backend by detecting the `-stubs` suffix.
Fixes#13546
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [markdown](https://redirect.github.com/wooorm/markdown-rs) |
dependencies | major | `0.3.0` -> `1.0.0` |
---
### Release Notes
<details>
<summary>wooorm/markdown-rs (markdown)</summary>
###
[`v1.0.0`](https://redirect.github.com/wooorm/markdown-rs/releases/tag/1.0.0)
💯
Nothing changed since the last alpha.
It’s just that: this crate’s now being used a bunch and working well, so
it’s time to be stable!
</details>
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC),
Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you
are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the
rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update
again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check
this box
---
This PR was generated by [Mend Renovate](https://mend.io/renovate/).
View the [repository job
log](https://developer.mend.io/github/astral-sh/uv).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOS4yNTcuMyIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM5LjI1Ny4zIiwidGFyZ2V0QnJhbmNoIjoibWFpbiIsImxhYmVscyI6WyJpbnRlcm5hbCJdfQ==-->
---------
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
This adopts the logic from `uv remove` for locking and syncing, as the
scope of the changes made are ultimately similar. Unlike `uv remove`
there is no support for modifying PEP723 scripts, as these are not
versioned.
In doing this the `version` command gains a truckload of args for
configuring lock/sync behaviour. Presumably most of these are passed via
settings or env files, and not of particular concern.
The most interesting additions are:
* `--frozen`: makes `uv version` work ~exactly as it did before this PR
* `--locked`: errors if the lockfile is out of date
* `--no-sync`: updates the lockfile, but doesn't run the equivalent of
`uv sync`
* `--package name`: a convenience for referring to a package in the
workspace
Note that the existing `--dry-run` flag effectively implies `--frozen` for sets and bumps.
Fixes#13254Fixes#13548
This also omits bounds on constraints, and is useful for that. This
retains `--raw-sources` as an alias. I've had this on my mind for a
while, but https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/12946 reminded me of it
again.
## Summary
Add a `--show-extras` argument to the `uv tool list` cli, to show which
extra dependencies were installed with the tool.
i.e.
```bash
$ uv tool install fastapi --with requests --with typer==0.14
```
```bash
$ uv tool list --show-extras
fastapi v0.115.12 [extras: requests, typer==0.14]
- fastapi
```
## Test Plan
Added a new test function based on the others in the same file, with the
other arguments tested with the new argument as well.
See commentary at
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9828#issuecomment-2537542100
regarding the limitations and future upstream changes needed.
```
❯ cargo build --features self-update
Compiling uv v0.5.8 (/Users/zb/workspace/uv/crates/uv)
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 7.28s
❯ cp ./target/debug/uv ~/.cargo/bin
❯ uv self update --dry-run
info: Checking for updates...
Nothing to do. You're on the latest version of uv (v0.5.8)
❯ uv self update --dry-run 0.5.7
info: Checking for updates...
Would update uv from v0.5.8 to v0.5.7
❯ vi ~/.config/uv/uv-receipt.json # Edit the receipt to think its on an older version
❯ uv self update --dry-run
info: Checking for updates...
Would update uv from v0.5.8 to the latest version
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Part of #12838. Allow users to configure `python-downloads-json-url` in
`uv.toml` and not just from env.
I followed similar PR #8695, so same as there it's also available in the
CLI (I think maybe it's better not to be configurable from the CLI, but
since the mirror parameters are, I think it's better to do the same)
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
This is a reimplementation of #7248 with a new CLI interface.
The old `uv version` is now `uv self version` (also it has gained a
`--short` flag for parity).
The new `uv version` is now an interface for getting/setting the project
version.
To give a modicum of support for migration, if `uv version` is run and
we fail to find/read a `pyproject.toml` we will fallback to `uv self
version`. `uv version --project .` prevents this fallback from being
allowed.
The new API of `uv version` is as follows:
* pass nothing to read the project version
* pass a version to set the project version
* `--bump major|minor|patch` to semver-bump the project version
* `--dry-run` to show the result but not apply it
* `--short` to have the final printout contain only the final version
* `--output-format json` to get the final printout as json
```
$ uv version
myfast 0.1.0
$ uv version --bump major --dry-run
myfast 0.1.0 => 1.0.0
$ uv version 1.2.3 --dry-run
myfast 0.1.0 => 1.2.3
$ uv version 1.2.3
myfast 0.1.0 => 1.2.3
$ uv version --short
1.2.3
$ uv version --output-format json
{
"package_name": "myfast",
"version": "1.2.3",
"commit_info": null
}
```
Fixes#6298
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This adds `poetry-core` as a build backend choice.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
Just a small PR to add mentions to `pylock.toml` in the CLI manual where
appropriate.
I tried to say "PEP-751 compatible lock files" when appropriate to also
include the case `r"^pylock\.([^.]+)\.toml$"`. Feel free to change that
if you think it's cluttery.
I also tried to include the "single-use" wording when it made sense.
I also have almost never used the `uv pip` interface, so maybe there are
some other minor things to add here and there about the usage of
`pylock.toml` that I missed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Fixes several occurrences of the minor typo “This options” for “This
option.”
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Since this is just a typo fix in documentation and comment strings, no
particular testing was conducted.
## Notes
The typo fixes in `crates/uv-cli/src/lib.rs` would affect
`docs/reference/cli.md`. I assumed you might want to just re-generate
the reference documention, but fixing it up manually would look like:
```diff
diff --git a/docs/reference/cli.md b/docs/reference/cli.md
index 338fa0ff9..8851ca2c0 100644
--- a/docs/reference/cli.md
+++ b/docs/reference/cli.md
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ uv run [OPTIONS] [COMMAND]
</dd><dt id="uv-run--no-group"><a href="#uv-run--no-group"><code>--no-group</code></a> <i>no-group</i></dt><dd><p>Disable the specified dependency group.</p>
-<p>This options always takes precedence over default groups, <code>--all-groups</code>, and <code>--group</code>.</p>
+<p>This option always takes precedence over default groups, <code>--all-groups</code>, and <code>--group</code>.</p>
<p>May be provided multiple times.</p>
@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ uv sync [OPTIONS]
</dd><dt id="uv-sync--no-group"><a href="#uv-sync--no-group"><code>--no-group</code></a> <i>no-group</i></dt><dd><p>Disable the specified dependency group.</p>
-<p>This options always takes precedence over default groups, <code>--all-groups</code>, and <code>--group</code>.</p>
+<p>This option always takes precedence over default groups, <code>--all-groups</code>, and <code>--group</code>.</p>
<p>May be provided multiple times.</p>
@@ -2492,7 +2492,7 @@ uv export [OPTIONS]
</dd><dt id="uv-export--no-group"><a href="#uv-export--no-group"><code>--no-group</code></a> <i>no-group</i></dt><dd><p>Disable the specified dependency group.</p>
-<p>This options always takes precedence over default groups, <code>--all-groups</code>, and <code>--group</code>.</p>
+<p>This option always takes precedence over default groups, <code>--all-groups</code>, and <code>--group</code>.</p>
<p>May be provided multiple times.</p>
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@ uv tree [OPTIONS]
</dd><dt id="uv-tree--no-group"><a href="#uv-tree--no-group"><code>--no-group</code></a> <i>no-group</i></dt><dd><p>Disable the specified dependency group.</p>
-<p>This options always takes precedence over default groups, <code>--all-groups</code>, and <code>--group</code>.</p>
+<p>This option always takes precedence over default groups, <code>--all-groups</code>, and <code>--group</code>.</p>
<p>May be provided multiple times.</p>
```
## Summary
This PR adds `uv export` support for [PEP
751](https://peps.python.org/pep-0751). We don't yet expose a way to
consume the generated lockfile, but it's a first step.
The logic to go from `uv.lock` to "flat set of packages to include, with
markers telling us when to include them" is all shared with the
`requirements.txt` export (and extracted in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/12956). So most of the code is just
converting from our internal types to the PEP 751 schema.
"Only show Python downloads, exclude installed distributions." might be
misunderstood as excluding installed distributions from `uv python list
--only-downloads`, implying that versions already installed won’t be
shown.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Adds the env arg `UV_NO_EDITABLE`.
Closes#12735
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I could not find a place where to add tests, any help would be
appreciated
---------
Co-authored-by: Aria Desires <aria.desires@gmail.com>
@jtfmumm mentioned a desire for this. I'm not sure how we should do
this. I kind of want to change this to something like...
```
$ uv python find
CPython 3.13 @ <path>
$ uv python find --only-path
<path>
$ uv python find --short
<path>
$ uv python find --only-version
3.13
```
The change in defaults would be breaking though.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Support the `UV_PROJECT` environment variable to set the project
directory.
#11946
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
`cargo nextest run` passed except the cache_prune.
```
export UV_PROJECT=/path/to/project
uv sync
```
works.
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Adding dependency trace/parent comments ("via ...") to the export
command output.
This is a similar behavior to the pip compile output.
#### Note to the eager reviewer:
First of all - thanks!
Secondly, this is still a very rough draft. These are the first lines of
code I've ever written in Rust. This is still mostly an educational/fun
exercise for myself. If opening a Draft PR is creating too much noise -
I apologize and I will close it until it is ready.
## Summary
Resolves#7777
## Test Plan
- [X] manual command execution
- [x] update expected output in tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
The idea here is that we introduce a new stdout_important method for
things that want to care about the difference between "quiet" and
"silent".
This PR is WIP because it has no actual uses of stdout_important, and we
should have at least one before landing this. Perhaps someone has a
suggestion for commands that would really benefit from this distinction?
Fixes#10431
## Summary
This fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/12426 which helps use
a more accurate arg name in the help output.
## Test Plan
I didn't test it locally, @charliermarsh gave me guidance on what to
change so I looked around that file for another example of `value_name`
and repeated what I saw. I kept it formatted to 1 line based on it not
being a long line. The other example of `value_name` had everything on
separate lines because there were a bunch of parameters passed in.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Allows `uv python list <request>` to filter the installed list. I often
want this and it's not hard to add.
I tested the remote download filtering locally (#12381 is needed for
snapshot tests)
```
❯ cargo run -q -- python list --all-versions 3.13
cpython-3.13.2-macos-aarch64-none <download available>
cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.13/bin/python3.13 -> ../Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.13/bin/python3.13
cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none <download available>
cpython-3.13.0-macos-aarch64-none /Users/zb/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.13.0-macos-aarch64-none/bin/python3.13
❯ cargo run -q -- python list --all-versions 3.13 --only-installed
cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.13/bin/python3.13 -> ../Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.13/bin/python3.13
cpython-3.13.0-macos-aarch64-none /Users/zb/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.13.0-macos-aarch64-none/bin/python3.13
```
## Summary
Resolves#11794.
When `uv python find` is given a `--script` option, either the existing
environment for that script or the Python executable that would be used
to create it will be returned. If neither are found, the command exits
with exit code 1.
`--script` is incompatible with all other options to the same command.
## Test Plan
Unit tests.
## Summary
This is a prototype that I'm considering shipping under `--preview`,
based on [`light-the-torch`](https://github.com/pmeier/light-the-torch).
`light-the-torch` patches pip to pull PyTorch packages from the PyTorch
indexes automatically. And, in particular, `light-the-torch` will query
the installed CUDA drivers to determine which indexes are compatible
with your system.
This PR implements equivalent behavior under `--torch-backend auto`,
though you can also set `--torch-backend cpu`, etc. for convenience.
When enabled, the registry client will fetch from the appropriate
PyTorch index when it sees a package from the PyTorch ecosystem (and
ignore any other configured indexes, _unless_ the package is explicitly
pinned to a different index).
Right now, this is only implemented in the `uv pip` CLI, since it
doesn't quite fit into the lockfile APIs given that it relies on feature
detection on the currently-running machine.
## Test Plan
On macOS, you can test this with (e.g.):
```shell
UV_TORCH_BACKEND=auto UV_CUDA_DRIVER_VERSION=450.80.2 cargo run \
pip install torch --python-platform linux --python-version 3.12
```
On a GPU-enabled EC2 machine:
```shell
ubuntu@ip-172-31-47-149:~/uv$ UV_TORCH_BACKEND=auto cargo run pip install torch -v
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.31s
Running `target/debug/uv pip install torch -v`
DEBUG uv 0.6.6 (e95ca063b 2025-03-14)
DEBUG Searching for default Python interpreter in virtual environments
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.13.0-linux-x86_64-gnu` at `/home/ubuntu/uv/.venv/bin/python3` (virtual environment)
DEBUG Using Python 3.13.0 environment at: .venv
DEBUG Acquired lock for `.venv`
DEBUG At least one requirement is not satisfied: torch
warning: The `--torch-backend` setting is experimental and may change without warning. Pass `--preview` to disable this warning.
DEBUG Detected CUDA driver version from `/sys/module/nvidia/version`: 550.144.3
...
```
Currently, for users to specify at the command line whether to use
uv-managed or system Python interpreters, they use the
`--python-preference` parameter, which takes four possible values. This
is more complex than necessary since the normal case is to either say
"only managed" or "not managed". This PR hides the old
`--python-preference` parameter from help and documentation and adds two
new flags: `--managed-python` and `--no-managed-python` to capture the
"only managed" and "not managed" cases.
I have successfully tested this locally but currently cannot add
snapshot tests because of problems with distinguishing managed vs.
system interpreters in CI (and non-determinism when run on different
developers' machines). The `--python-preference` test in
`tool-install.rs` is currently ignored for this reason. See #5144 and
#7473.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This has come up a few times, so it seems worth addressing. If you
migrate from a flat layout to a `src` layout or vice versa, we now
invalidate the package metadata.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/12047
This is a minimal redux of #10861 to be compatible with `uv pip`.
This implements the interface described in:
https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/13065#issuecomment-2544000876 for `uv
pip install` and `uv pip compile`. Namely `--group <[path:]name>`, where
`path` when not defined defaults to `pyproject.toml`.
In that interface they add `--group` to `pip install`, `pip download`,
and `pip wheel`. Notably we do not define `uv pip download` and `uv pip
wheel`, so for parity we only need to implement `uv pip install`.
However, we also support `uv pip compile` which is not part of pip
itself, and `--group` makes sense there too.
----
The behaviour of `--group` for `uv pip` commands makes sense for the
cases upstream pip supports, but has confusing meanings in cases that
only we support (because reading pyproject.tomls is New Tech to them but
heavily supported by us). **Specifically case (h) below is a concerning
footgun, and case (e) below may get complaints from people who aren't
well-versed in dependency-groups-as-they-pertain-to-wheels.**
## Only Group Flags
Group flags on their own work reasonably and uncontroversially, except
perhaps that they don't do very clever automatic project discovery.
a) `uv pip install --group path/to/pyproject.toml:mygroup` pulls up
`path/to/project.toml` and installs all the packages listed by its
`mygroup` dependency-group (essentially treating it like another kind of
requirements.txt). In this regard it functions similarly to
`--only-group` in the rest of uv's interface.
b) `uv pip install --group mygroup` is just sugar for `uv pip install
--group pyproject.toml:mygroup` (**note that no project discovery
occurs**, upstream pip simply hardcodes the path "pyproject.toml" here
and we reproduce that.)
c) `uv pip install --group a/pyproject.toml:groupx --group
b/pyproject.toml:groupy`, and any other instance of multiple `--group`
flags, can be understood as completely independent requests for the
given groups at the given files.
## Groups With Named Packages
Groups being mixed with named packages also work in a fairly
unsurprising way, especially if you understand that things like
dependency-groups are not really supposed to exist on pypi, they're just
for local development.
d) `uv pip install mypackage --group path/to/pyproject.toml:mygroup`
much like multiple instances of `--group` the two requests here are
essentially completely independent: pleases install `mypackage`, and
please also install `path/to/pyproject.toml:mygroup`.
e) `uv pip install mypackage --group mygroup` is exactly the same, but
this is where it becomes possible for someone to be a little confused,
as you might think `mygroup` is supposed to refer to `mypackage` in some
way (it can't). But no, it's sourcing `pyproject.toml:mygroup` from the
current working directory.
## Groups With Requirements/Sourcetrees/Editables
Requirements and sourcetrees are where I expect users to get confused.
It behaves *exactly* the same as it does in the previous sections but
you would absolutely be forgiven for expecting a different behaviour.
*Especially* because `--group` with the rest of uv *does* do something
different.
f) `uv pip install -r a/pyproject.toml --group b/pyproject.toml:mygroup`
is again just two independent requests (install `a/pyproject.toml`'s
dependencies, and `b/pyproject.toml`'s `mygroup`).
g) `uv pip install -r pyproject.toml --group mygroup` is exactly like
the previous case but *incidentally* the two requests refer to the same
file. What the user wanted to happen is almost certainly happening, but
they are likely getting "lucky" here that they're requesting something
simple.
h) `uv pip install -r a/pyproject.toml --group mygroup` is again exactly
the same but the user is likely to get surprised and upset as this
invocation actually sources two different files (install
`a/pyproject.toml`'s dependencies, and `pyproject.toml`'s `mygroup`)! I
would expect most people to assume the `--group` flag here is covering
all applicable requirements/sourcetrees/editables, but no, it continues
to be a totally independent reference to a file with a hardcoded
relative path.
------
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8590
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8969
Charlie Marsh
konsti
Aaron Ang
Zanie Blue
Elijah Hartvigsen
John Mumm
adisbladis
Nathan Cain
Aria Desires
Noam Teyssier
Lan, Jian
Jack O'Connor
Hood Chatham
Tobias Gårdhus
johnthagen
renovate[bot]
Meitar Reihan
Bartosz Sokorski
ReinforcedKnowledge
Ben Beasley
Jo
Ahmed Ilyas
Haaris Rahman
Nozomi R
Zohar Meir
Nick Janetakis
InSync
Yury Fedotov