## Summary
You can now run `uv tree --script main.py` to show the dependency tree
for a given script. If a lockfile doesn't exist, it will create one.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7328.
## Summary
`uv add --script main.py anyio` will now update the lockfile, _if_ it
already exists. (If no such lockfile exists, the behavior is unchanged.)
## Summary
This PR adds `ls` alias to `uv {tool, python, pip} list` for
convenience.
Not sure if folks previously discussed this or have any opinion on
having aliases – but I have a muscle memory for `ls` for listing things
in commands I'm using (like `docker images ls`, `zellij ls`, `helm ls`
etc.) and thought having `ls` alias for `list` command would be useful.
## Test Plan
I simply compiled `uv` and manually checked `./target/release/uv {tool,
python, pip} ls`.
The latest release flaked failing to fetch the buildx image, which is
reportedly due to rate limits. Last I checked, DockerHub enforces much
stricter limits on unauthenticated requests. I added a bot account and a
corresponding read-only token.
## Summary
You can now run `uv lock --script main.py` to lock a given script
(though as of this PR, the script itself isn't used anywhere).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6318.
The shellcheck action we uses misses some files, so they fell out of
spec for what we support. This PR first and foremost adds them to the
scanning list, and then fixes the issues found.
Fixes#7480
## Summary
This PR revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/7827 to improve
tool resolutions such that, if the resolution fails, and the selected
interpreter doesn't match the required Python version from the solve, we
attempt to re-solve with a newly-discovered interpreter that _does_
match the required Python version.
For now, we attempt to choose a Python interpreter that's greater than
the inferred `requires-python`, but compatible with the same Python
minor. This helps avoid successive failures for cases like Posting,
where choosing Python 3.13 fails because it has a dependency that lacks
source distributions and doesn't publish any Python 3.13 wheels. We
should further improve the strategy to solve _that_ case too, but this
is at least the more conservative option...
In short, if you do `uv tool instal posting`, and we find Python 3.8 on
your machine, we'll detect that `requires-python: >=3.11`, then search
for the latest Python 3.11 interpreter and re-resolve.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6381.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10282.
## Test Plan
The following should succeed:
```
cargo run python uninstall --all
cargo run python install 3.8
cargo run tool install posting
```
In the logs, we see:
```
...
DEBUG No compatible version found for: posting
DEBUG Refining interpreter with: Python >=3.11, <3.12
DEBUG Searching for Python >=3.11, <3.12 in managed installations or search path
DEBUG Searching for managed installations at `/Users/crmarsh/.local/share/uv/python`
DEBUG Skipping incompatible managed installation `cpython-3.8.20-macos-aarch64-none`
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none` at `/opt/homebrew/bin/python3` (search path)
DEBUG Skipping interpreter at `/opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.13/bin/python3.13` from search path: does not satisfy request `>=3.11, <3.12`
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.11.7-macos-aarch64-none` at `/opt/homebrew/bin/python3.11` (search path)
DEBUG Re-resolving with Python 3.11.7
DEBUG Using request timeout of 30s
DEBUG Solving with installed Python version: 3.11.7
DEBUG Solving with target Python version: >=3.11.7
DEBUG Adding direct dependency: posting*
DEBUG Searching for a compatible version of posting (*)
...
```
This test started failing on main.
I don't understand why this changed (there was a new release but exclude-newer is supposed to exclude those), but the error message improved.
PowerPC seems to build without errors if we upgrade `zlib-ng`, but
upgrading `zlib-ng` causes Windows to break
(https://github.com/rust-lang/libz-sys/issues/225), and Cargo doesn't
let us include two different versions.
s390x fails because it can't find `stfle`. It's possible that we could
fix this by by upgrading our manylinux version and/or by upgrading GCC
(which may necessitate upgrading our manylinux version), but I don't
know if it's fixable without one of those things? And it's not worth
bumping compatibility for that reason. \cc @konstin
This happened as a result of #10345 and #10362 being merged
independently. The latter used the old `Version::release` API, but the
former changed the `Version::release` API. This PR tweaks the new test
to use the new API (i.e., force a deref on the proxy type).
Basically, this explicitly checks that parsing a `1.2.0` into a
`Version` will roundtrip back to a `1.2.0`, and that parsing a `1.2`
will roundtrip back to a `1.2`.
I think this case is included in the other tests in this module, but
this test makes the behavior more clearly intentional I think.
Ref #10345
Ref https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10344
Not a performance optimization, but the function had become too large.
No logic changes, just code moving around. Looks slightly better when
ignoring whitespace changes.
It's still too complex but i haven't found an apt simplification.
## Summary
This allows, e.g., `uv remove flask[dotenv]` to remove `flask`. Like
`pip install` and `uv pip install`, the content after the package name
has no effect.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9764.
* Previously had uv python install, then uv sync --all-extras --dev
* If we are going to use sync for dev dependencies, then the install
step is unneccessary
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
https://docs.rs/serde_json/latest/serde_json/fn.from_reader.html
suggests that
> When reading from a source against which short reads are not
efficient, such as a
[File](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fs/struct.File.html), you will want
to apply your own buffering because serde_json will not buffer the
input. See
[std::io::BufReader](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/io/struct.BufReader.html).
Without this buffering, we observe a sequence of single byte reads which
can be quite inefficient depending on the underlying filesystem.
This adds buffering with `std::io::BufReader` to resolve this.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Unit tests cover this code.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
When `--upgrade` is provided, we should retain already-installed
packages _if_ they're newer than whatever is available from the
registry.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10089.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Add info about uv being available in Scoop.
## Test Plan
`uvx --with-requirements .\docs\requirements.txt mkdocs serve
--config-file mkdocs.public.yml` worked.
## Summary
Sort of undecided on this. These are already stored as `dyn Reporter` in
each struct, so we're already using dynamic dispatch in that sense. But
all the methods take `impl Reporter`. This is sometimes nice (the
callsites are simpler?), but it also means that in practice, you often
_can't_ pass `None` to these methods that accept `Option<impl
Reporter>`, because Rust can't infer the generic type.
Anyway, this adds more consistency and simplifies the setup by using
`Arc<dyn Reporter>` everywhere.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Follow up to #8553
Clarifies that the `exclude-newer` setting must be a full timestamp and
not a date.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
N/A
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Charlie Marsh
Burak Varlı
Zanie Blue
renovate[bot]
Aria Desires
konsti
Kevin Marchais
Andrew Gallant
csteiner
Andrew Tulloch
github-actions[bot]
Olav Rønnestad Birkeland
Trevor Manz
vladislav doster