<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Updated docs dockerfile from Debian 11 (bullseye) to latest stable
Debian 12 (bookworm).
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Docs at https://docs.astral.sh/uv/pip/compatibility/ still say:
> the future, uv will also support persistent configuration in its own
configuration file format (e.g., pyproject.toml or uv.toml or similar).
For more, see [#651](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/651).
I think that's done now (?), so updated these to link to
https://docs.astral.sh/uv/configuration/files/
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Mark the new tests requiring Python 3.12.1 specifically as requiring
python-patch feature. This makes the test suite pass again on systems
not having this specific version (and disabling the feature).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` on Gentoo :-).
## Summary
It turns out we weren't applying the collapse logic here, so dev deps
with extras were repeated. This was generally ok... unless we ended up
_dropping_ an extra, in which case, you now have a duplicate.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6380.
In https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6359, I accidentally made `uv
python install` prefer `.python-version` files over `.python-versions`
files -.-, kind of niche but it's a regression.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6285
Introduces a new problem if the user says `python` but it doesn't exist
with that name:
```
❯ cargo run -q -- -v run python --version
DEBUG uv 0.3.0
DEBUG Found project root: `/Users/zb/workspace/uv`
DEBUG Project `uv` is marked as unmanaged
DEBUG No project found; searching for Python interpreter
DEBUG Reading requests from `/Users/zb/workspace/uv/.python-version`
DEBUG Searching for Python 3.11 in managed installations or system path
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.12.4-macos-aarch64-none` at `/Users/zb/workspace/uv/.venv/bin/python3` (virtual environment)
DEBUG Searching for managed installations at `/Users/zb/Library/Application Support/uv/python`
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.11.9-macos-aarch64-none` at `/opt/homebrew/bin/python3.11` (search path)
DEBUG Using Python 3.11.9 interpreter at: /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.11/bin/python3.11
DEBUG Running `python --version`
error: Failed to spawn: `python`
Caused by: No such file or directory (os error 2)
```
I'll fix this separately.
Docs show an underscore which should be a dash in dev-dependencies:
`dev_dependencies = ["ruff==0.5.0"]`
## Summary
I followed the example in the references settings and used
dev_dependencies in my pyproject.toml but it seems like this needs to be
a dash instead of an underscore:
=> ERROR [stage-0 5/5] RUN uv sync 6.9s
------
> [stage-0 5/5] RUN uv sync:
0.085 warning: Failed to parse `pyproject.toml` during settings
discovery:
0.085 TOML parse error at line 65, column 1
0.085 |
0.085 65 | [tool.uv]
0.085 | ^^^^^^^^^
0.085 unknown field `dev_dependencies`
0.085
## Summary
We're gonna work on a more comprehensive review of whether we should
preserve the username here, but for now, `git@` is effectively a
convention for GitHub and GitLab etc.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6305.
## Test Plan
I guess we don't have infrastructure for testing SSH private keys right
now, but...
```
❯ cargo run init foo
❯ cd foo
❯ cargo run add git+ssh://git@github.com/astral-sh/mkdocs-material-insiders.git
```
For a path dep such as the root project, uv can read metadata statically
from `pyproject.toml` or dynamically from the build backend.
Python's `packaging`
[sorts](cc938f984b/src/packaging/specifiers.py (L777))
specifiers before emitting them, so all build backends built on top of
it - such as hatchling - will change the specifier order compared to
pyproject.toml. The core metadata spec does say "If a field is not
marked as Dynamic, then the value of the field in any wheel built from
the sdist MUST match the value in the sdist", but it doesn't specify if
"match" means string equivalent or semantically equivalent, so it's
arguable if that spec conformant. This change means that the specifiers
have a different ordering when coming from the build backend than when
read statically from pyproject.toml.
Previously, we tried to read path dep metadata in order:
* From the (built wheel) cache (`packaging` order)
* From pyproject.toml (verbatim specifier)
* From a fresh build (`packaging` order)
This behaviour is unstable: On the first run, we cache is cold, so we
read the verbatim specifier from `pyproject.toml`, then we build and
store the metadata in the cache. On the second run, we read the
`packaging` sorted specifier from the cache.
Reproducer:
```shell
rm -rf newproj
uv init -q --no-config newproj
cd newproj/
uv add -q "anyio>=4,<5"
cat uv.lock | grep "requires-dist"
uv sync -q
cat uv.lock | grep "requires-dist"
cd ..
```
```
requires-dist = [{ name = "anyio", specifier = ">=4,<5" }]
requires-dist = [{ name = "anyio", specifier = "<5,>=4" }]
```
A project either has static metadata, so we can read from
pyproject.toml, or it doesn't, and we always read from the build through
`packaging`. We can use this to stabilize the behavior by slightly
switching the order.
* From pyproject.toml (verbatim specifier)
* From the (built wheel) cache (`packaging` order)
* From a fresh build (`packaging` order)
Potentially, we still want to sort the specifiers we get anyway, after
all, the is no guarantee that the specifiers from a build backend are
deterministic. But our metadata reading behavior should be independent
of the cache state, hence changing the order in the PR.
Fixes#6316
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I think it's important to clarify that `uvx` is simply an alias for `uv
tool run`. This distinction helps avoid confusion about when to use `uv`
versus `uvx`. I thought the [blog
post](https://astral.sh/blog/uv-unified-python-packaging) explained this
well.
Just something that I ran into, I understand others may have a different
perspective!
## Test Plan
n/a
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5915, not entirely sure
if `manylinux_compatible` should be a separate field in the JSON
returned by the interpreter or there's some way to use the existing
`platform` for it.
## Test Plan
ran the below
```
rm -rf .venv
target/debug/uv venv
# commenting out the line below triggers the change..
# target/debug/uv pip install no-manylinux
target/debug/uv pip install cryptography --no-cache
```
is there an easy way to add this into the existing snapshot-based test
suite? looking around to see if there's a way that doesn't involve
something implementation-dependent like mocks.
~update: i think the output does differ between these two, so probably
we can use that.~ i lied - that "building..." output seems to be
discarded.
## Summary
For non-virtual workspaces, these are covered by the _members_. But for
virtual workspaces, they aren't captured anywhere else in the lock. So,
we weren't invalidating `uv.lock` when the dev dependencies changed,
which led to a panic.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6288
## Summary
This ensures that we don't stream output to the `--output-file`, since
other processes may rely on reading it.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6239.
