Signed-off-by: Frost Ming <me@frostming.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR solves an issue on Windows that platform-specific paths are
written to the `RECORD` file when installing, which is inconsistent with
PEP 376, quoting:
> Each record is composed of three elements:
>
>the file’s path
> * a ‘/’-separated path, relative to the base location, if the file is
under the base location.
> * a ‘/’-separated path, relative to the base location, if the file is
under the installation prefix AND if the base location is a subpath of
the installation prefix.
> * an absolute path, using the local platform separator
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Test case included
---------
Signed-off-by: Frost Ming <me@frostming.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR introduces a `LockTarget`, which is peer to `InstallTarget` and
enables us to capture the common functionality necessary to support
locking.
For now, to minimize changes, only the `Workspace` target is
implemented. In a future PR, I'll add a `Script` target for both locking
and installing.
## Summary
The proximate motivation is that I want to add new variant for scripts,
but `uv-resolver` can't depend on `uv-scripts` without creating a
circular dependency. However, I think this _does_ just make more sense
-- the resolver crate shouldn't be coupled to the various kinds of
workspaces, and these details are mostly encoded in `projects/lock.rs`
and similar files.
## Summary
This is necessary for some future improvements to non-`[project]`
workspaces and PEP 723 scripts. It's not "breaking", but it will
invalidate lockfiles for non-`[project]` workspaces. I think that's
okay, since we consider those legacy right now, and they're really rare.
## Summary
We had the right logic for determining whether the list is already
sorted, but we forgot to apply the same logic when deciding where to
insert the requirement, which made the list _unsorted_ for future
operations.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10076.
