## Summary
The new `--index` and `--default-index` flags are being omitted in the
`uv pip compile` header, unintentionally.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9287.
## Summary
I find myself messing this up with `--build-constraint` vs.
`--build-constraints`, and it turns out our own CLI isn't fully
consistent here either.
When building only a single crate in the workspace to run its tests, we
often recompile a lot of other, unrelated crates. Whenever cargo has a
different set of crate features, it needs to recompile. By moving some
features (non-exhaustive for now) to the workspace level, we always
activate them an avoid recompiling.
The cargo docs mismatch the behavior of cargo around default-deps, so I
filed that upstream and left most `default-features` mismatches:
https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/14841.
Reference script:
```python
import tomllib
from collections import defaultdict
from pathlib import Path
uv = Path("/home/konsti/projects/uv")
skip_list = ["uv-trampoline", "uv-dev", "uv-performance-flate2-backend", "uv-performance-memory-allocator"]
root_feature_map = defaultdict(set)
root_default_features = defaultdict(bool)
cargo_toml = tomllib.loads(uv.joinpath("Cargo.toml").read_text())
for dep, declaration in cargo_toml["workspace"]["dependencies"].items():
root_default_features[dep] = root_default_features[dep] or declaration.get("default-features", True)
root_feature_map[dep].update(declaration.get("features", []))
feature_map = defaultdict(set)
default_features = defaultdict(bool)
for crate in uv.joinpath("crates").iterdir():
if crate.name in skip_list:
continue
if not crate.joinpath("Cargo.toml").is_file():
continue
cargo_toml = tomllib.loads(crate.joinpath("Cargo.toml").read_text())
for dep, declaration in cargo_toml.get("dependencies", {}).items():
# If any item uses default features, they are used everywhere
default_features[dep] = default_features[dep] or declaration.get("default-features", True)
feature_map[dep].update(declaration.get("features", []))
for dep, features in sorted(feature_map.items()):
features = features - root_feature_map.get(dep, set())
if not features and default_features[dep] == root_default_features[dep]:
continue
print(dep, default_features[dep], sorted(features))
```
## Summary
Just trying to unify the retry handling, as in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/9274 and elsewhere. Right now, the
publish handler doesn't use any backoff and always retries three times
regardless of settings.
## Summary
This was an oversight in the initial implementation. We shouldn't
validate sources for the `build-system.requires` field, since extras and
groups can _never_ be active.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9259.
Fixes this really annoying behavior where the served documentation would
not reflect changes to the mkdocs template file (where we store all of
our actual configuration)
ref https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/pull/2642
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
In uv-globfilter, use the workspace `fs-err` in `dev-dependencies`.
This fixes an unnecessary dev-dependency on `fs-err` 2.x even after the
workspace fs-err was updated to 3.x in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/8625.
The `Cargo.lock` file still has `fs-err v2.11.0` after this PR, but it
is via `tracing-durations-export v0.3.0` rather than directly required
by any `uv` crate.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
```
$ cd crates/uv-globfilter/
$ cargo test
```
## Summary
It turns out that `WrappedReqwestError` skips the `reqwest::Error`
itself in order to hack the display. This PR adds it to the list of
variants we check when retrying transient errors.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9246.
## Test Plan
Patched `reqwest` locally to return an error in `bytes()`. Verified that
it was _not_ caught prior to this PR, but was caught afterwards.
On large screens, we require scrolling below the fold for the next page
/ prev page navigation footer. This dramatically improves visibility of
the left nav when looking at small pages like section overviews.
Critically, this stops the height of the navigation from jumping around
depending on the page you're on. On small screens, the positioning is
unchanged since the nav is in a hamburger menu and it'd be annoying to
scroll.
Eventually, we could move the next / prev nav out of the footer and into
the content, e.g., as in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/9121#issuecomment-2479282706.
These images don't quite do the change in experience justice. It's the
consistency when changing pages that feels the most different.
Before
<img width="1484" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-15 at 10 16 30 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e0729691-31ea-46cc-9679-636fb144eab7">
After
<img width="1474" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-15 at 10 15 26 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d01ae5cd-1347-45de-a294-fbd56b2d6fb5">
- Adds a collapsible section for the project concept
- Splits the project concept document into several child documents.
- Moves the workspace and dependencies documents to under the project
section
- Adds a mkdocs plugin for redirects, so links to the moved documents
still work
I attempted to make the minimum required changes to the contents of the
documents here. There is a lot of room for improvement on the content of
each new child document. For review purposes, I want to do that work
separately. I'd prefer if the review focused on this structure and idea
rather than the content of the files.
I expect to do this to other documentation pages that would otherwise be
very nested.
The project concept landing page and nav (collapsed by default) looks
like this now:
<img width="1507" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-14 at 11 28 45 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/88288b09-8463-49d4-84ba-ee27144b62a5">
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
PR #4965 added `*-manylinux_2_31` as a target triple, and issue #4966
described the need for a more general solution.
In lieu of a general solution, this PR adds further explicit manylinux
target triples for different glibc version up to the one used by the
latest Ubuntu release (glibc 2.40 used in Ubuntu 24.10).
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Local, manual testing with a Python wheel targeting
`x86_64-manylinux_2_35`.
Allow including data files in wheels, configured through
`pyproject.toml`. This configuration is currently only read in the build
backend. We'd only start using it in the frontend when we're adding a
fast path.
Each data entry is a directory, whose contents are copied to the
matching directory in the wheel in
`<name>-<version>.data/(purelib|platlib|headers|scripts|data)`. Upon
installation, this data is moved to its target location, as defined by
<https://docs.python.org/3.12/library/sysconfig.html#installation-paths>:
- `data`: Installed over the virtualenv environment root. Warning: This
may override existing files!
- `scripts`: Installed to the directory for executables, `<venv>/bin` on
Unix or `<venv>\Scripts` on Windows. This directory is added to PATH
when the virtual environment is activated or when using `uv run`, so
this data type can be used to install additional binaries. Consider
using `project.scripts` instead for starting Python code.
- `headers`: Installed to the include directory, where compilers
building Python packages with this package as built requirement will
search for header files.
- `purelib` and `platlib`: Installed to the `site-packages` directory.
It is not recommended to uses these two options.
For simplicity, for now we're just defining a directory to be copied for
each data directory, while using the glob based include mechanism in the
background. We thereby introduce a third mechanism next to the main
includes and the PEP 639 mechanism, which is not what we should finalize
on.
## Summary
The reqwest middleware doesn't retry errors that occur "after" the
request completes -- but in some cases, these do include spurious errors
that we want to retry. See https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8144
for examples. This PR adds a second retry layer during the response
_handler_, which should help with some of the spurious failures we see
in the linked issue.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8144.
## Summary
We missed the case in which the user has a legacy non-`[project]` root
-- we were always installing all members.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9214.
## Summary
Now that we have all the pieces in place, this PR adds some dedicated
documentation to enable a variety of PyTorch setups.
This PR is downstream of #6523 and builds on the content in there; #6523
will merge first, and this PR will follow.
## Summary
This PR enables something like the "final boss" of PyTorch setups --
explicit support for CPU vs. GPU-enabled variants via extras:
```toml
[project]
name = "project"
version = "0.1.0"
requires-python = ">=3.13.0"
dependencies = []
[project.optional-dependencies]
cpu = [
"torch==2.5.1+cpu",
]
gpu = [
"torch==2.5.1",
]
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = [
{ index = "torch-cpu", extra = "cpu" },
{ index = "torch-gpu", extra = "gpu" },
]
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "torch-cpu"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu"
explicit = true
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "torch-gpu"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu124"
explicit = true
[tool.uv]
conflicts = [
[
{ extra = "cpu" },
{ extra = "gpu" },
],
]
```
It builds atop the conflicting extras work to allow sources to be marked
as specific to a dedicated extra being enabled or disabled.
As part of this work, sources now have an `extra` field. If a source has
an `extra`, it means that the source is only applied to the requirement
when defined within that optional group. For example, `{ index =
"torch-cpu", extra = "cpu" }` above only applies to
`"torch==2.5.1+cpu"`.
The `extra` field does _not_ mean that the source is "enabled" when the
extra is activated. For example, this wouldn't work:
```toml
[project]
name = "project"
version = "0.1.0"
requires-python = ">=3.13.0"
dependencies = ["torch"]
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = [
{ index = "torch-cpu", extra = "cpu" },
{ index = "torch-gpu", extra = "gpu" },
]
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "torch-cpu"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu"
explicit = true
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "torch-gpu"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu124"
explicit = true
```
In this case, the sources would effectively be ignored. Extras are
really confusing... but I think this is correct? We don't want enabling
or disabling extras to affect resolution information that's _outside_ of
the relevant optional group.
Hello there! First real docs PR for uv.
1. I expect this will be rewritten a gazillion times to have a
consistent tone with the rest of the docs, despite me trying to stick to
it as best as I could. Feel free to edit!
2. I went super on the verbose mode, while also providing a callout with
a TLDR on top. Scrap anything you feel it's redundant!
3. I placed the guide under `integrations` since Charlie added the
FastAPI integration there.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Addresses #5945
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I just looked at the docs on the dev server of mkdocs if it looked nice.
**I could not test the commands that I wrote work** outside of macOS. If
someone among contributors has a Windows/Linux laptop, it should be
enough, even for the GPU-supported versions: I expect the installation
will just break once torch checks for CUDA (perhaps even at runtime).
---------
Co-authored-by: Santiago Castro <bryant1410@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
These were moved as part of a broader refactor to create a single
integration test module. That "single integration test module" did
indeed have a big impact on compile times, which is great! But we aren't
seeing any benefit from moving these tests into their own files (despite
the claim in [this blog
post](https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html),
I see the same compilation pattern regardless of where the tests are
located). Plus, we don't have many of these, and same-file tests is such
a strong Rust convention.
