mirror of
https://github.com/Druthulu/BFM-decomp
synced 2026-09-28 14:59:48 -04:00
docs(phase-30): post-wave frontier re-derived + TWO pricing corrections (§133 both ways)
Frontier at HEAD after the 2,192-member propagation: overlays 94.7% fn / 91.8% instr / 85.0% distinct; 13,658 distinct classes remain. - S4 PINS RETIRED WITHOUT EXECUTION: planned at 44,279 ins from worklist.md (h_exact-priced, x138/fn); family-map priced after the waves it is 24 fns / 101 ins. The same mis-pricing that under-valued the frontier head by 138x over-valued this by ~440x. - S6 ADDED, highest ROI: 190 zero-crack families / 129,997 ins, ~0 agent tokens. 106 of them have exemplars OUTSIDE ov_SC01_077, and every sweep this project has run passed --source ov_SC01_077 — structurally unreachable, not walled. Probe-confirmed on func_8012B77C (defined in ov_SC07_006, still a stub in ov_SC01_000). - S5 re-derived as the x10-99 band: 243 families / 239,058 ins.
This commit is contained in:
+4
-4
@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
|
||||
|
||||
> Generated by `tools/family_hseq.py` from the 138 overlay sigs + per-overlay src stubs. Ranked by TEMPLATABLE byte-weight (PURE+IMM members × nins × 4). The byte-gate is the arbiter.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Scope: the 138 OVERLAYS only** (no main, no resident) · generated at HEAD `commit:1338` · stub set derived from `corpus.stubs` — the same oracle `progress.py` counts, so same-tree overlay totals agree by construction; compare digests only at the same HEAD.
|
||||
> **Scope: the 138 OVERLAYS only** (no main, no resident) · generated at HEAD `commit:1341` · stub set derived from `corpus.stubs` — the same oracle `progress.py` counts, so same-tree overlay totals agree by construction; compare digests only at the same HEAD.
|
||||
|
||||
**Fleet (overlays):** 94.1% fn / 91.3% instr / 84.8% distinct-code matched. Unmatched: 20,827 instances / 1,135,911 ins (14,045 distinct classes).
|
||||
**Fleet (overlays):** 94.7% fn / 91.8% instr / 85.0% distinct-code matched. Unmatched: 18,635 instances / 1,069,466 ins (13,658 distinct classes).
|
||||
|
||||
**Tail cross-check (Phase-25 close):** 10,454 tail fns / 466,890 ins → 492 h_seq families ≥2, **127 substantial (nins≥80) / 118,421 ins**.
|
||||
**Tail cross-check (Phase-25 close):** 10,043 tail fns / 456,957 ins → 489 h_seq families ≥2, **127 substantial (nins≥80) / 118,421 ins**.
|
||||
|
||||
**Full frontier (all unmatched by h_seq):** 2394 target families (≥2 members or a matched sibling) + 3767 singletons (Step-D residue). Substantial: **461 families / 430,429 templatable ins**, 20 with a matched sibling (zero-crack). Substantial member classes: 2,606 PURE · 31 IMM · 6 STRUCT-excluded.
|
||||
**Full frontier (all unmatched by h_seq):** 2378 target families (≥2 members or a matched sibling) + 3767 singletons (Step-D residue). Substantial: **461 families / 430,429 templatable ins**, 20 with a matched sibling (zero-crack). Substantial member classes: 2,606 PURE · 31 IMM · 6 STRUCT-excluded.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Top substantial families (by templatable byte-weight)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -194,11 +194,41 @@ Session start (S28 close) was 93.25 / 89.2 / 80.5 ⇒ **+1.18 / +2.2 / +3.5pp to
|
||||
6. **Cookbook §132 · §132a · §133** (the DEFAULT-FILTER class — three times in one session a tool
|
||||
silently answered a narrower question than the one asked).
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 THE POST-WAVE FRONTIER (re-derived at HEAD after the 2,192-member propagation — R35)
|
||||
Overlays: **94.7% fn / 91.8% instr / 85.0% distinct**; unmatched **18,635 instances / 1,069,466 ins /
|
||||
13,658 distinct classes** → 2,378 families + 3,767 singletons.
|
||||
|
||||
| lever | scale | cost | verdict |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Zero-crack propagation (source-agnostic)** | **190 families / 129,997 ins** | **~0 agent tokens** | **DO FIRST (S6)** |
|
||||
| ×10-99 fresh-crack band | 243 families / 239,058 ins | agent waves | next (S5) |
|
||||
| STRUCT class (ov077 surface) | 29 fns / 39,892 ins | agent waves | after S5 |
|
||||
| GIANT | 4 fns / 100,188 ins | 2 are the known walls (close=110/91) | P32's track |
|
||||
| ×2-9 fresh-crack | 1,941 families / 410,671 ins | biggest mass, worst multiplier | deprioritised |
|
||||
| ×1 singletons | 3,767 / 230,367 ins | ×1 | deprioritised |
|
||||
| ~~S4 PINS~~ | **101 ins** (not 44,279) | — | **RETIRED, see below** |
|
||||
|
||||
**TWO PRICING CORRECTIONS (both §133, in OPPOSITE directions — this is why the table is re-derived):**
|
||||
1. **S4 PINS is retired on measurement.** The plan priced it at **44,279 ins** from `worklist.md`,
|
||||
which prices by **h_exact reach** (×138/fn). Re-priced against the family map after the waves, the
|
||||
PINS functions' families are almost all already matched/propagated: **24 fns / 101 templatable ins**.
|
||||
Running the planned wave would have bought ~0.001pp. The same mis-pricing that once *under*-valued
|
||||
the frontier head by 138× *over*-valued this by ~440×.
|
||||
2. **106 of the 190 zero-crack families have exemplars OUTSIDE `ov_SC01_077`** (ov_SC03_014 17,
|
||||
ov_SC06_018 10, ov_SC01_084 9, ov_SC02_027 7, ov_SC02_011 7, …). **Every sweep this project has run
|
||||
passed `--source ov_SC01_077`**, so those families were structurally unreachable — not hard, not
|
||||
walled, just never addressed. Probe-confirmed: `func_8012B77C` is DEFINED in ov_SC07_006 and still
|
||||
an `INCLUDE_ASM` stub in ov_SC01_000.
|
||||
|
||||
## ▶ RESUME HERE (T6: S1–S3 done, both UC waves done; nothing blocked, nothing running)
|
||||
- **The ×138 redraft band is now CONSUMED.** All 33 fresh-crack ≥100-member families are banked
|
||||
except the 2 GIANT walls (`func_801412A8` close=110, `func_80178004` close=91 — P32's track).
|
||||
- **S4 PINS** (14 fns / 44,279 ins) — the pin-crash wall dissolved in P27, several already close=0.
|
||||
- **S5** the ×10-133 mid-multiplicity band (142,527 ins) — the next mass, at a lower multiplier.
|
||||
- **S6 (NEW, highest ROI): source-agnostic zero-crack propagation** — 190 families / 129,997 ins,
|
||||
~0 agent tokens. Drive each family from ITS OWN exemplar overlay, not always ov_SC01_077; route by
|
||||
tier (§123) and pass **`--band all`** (the S1 trap). Probe one sibling per family first.
|
||||
- **S5: the ×10-99 band** — 243 families / 239,058 ins, the proven 3-lane workflow. Expect the ROI
|
||||
floor here: the multiplier is 10-99, not 138.
|
||||
- ~~S4 PINS~~ **RETIRED on measurement** (101 ins, not 44,279 — see the pricing corrections above).
|
||||
- **The 411 stage-but-DIFF propagation residue** — per-overlay variants whose remapped bodies do not
|
||||
reproduce; individually gate-rejected, ledger material not a lever.
|
||||
- **Reusable machinery from today** (all committed): the 3-lane workflow scripts under
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user