mirror of
https://github.com/Druthulu/BFM-decomp
synced 2026-10-08 01:34:14 -04:00
docs(phase-30): SS127 the -O0 idiom set + SESSION-28 wave checkpoint (honest ROI)
SS127/SS127a/SS127b distil what the wave's agents kept re-deriving, because the index fired on only 3 of 15 targets: - the -O0 CONSTANT-OFFSET FOLD: `p->f` folds to `lbu 3(r)`, `p[i]` does NOT (addiu + 0-displacement load). At -O2 these converge, which is why nothing in SS1-SS126 covers it. - the -O0 regime generally: spill/reload pairs are REAL named locals; load-delay nops and redundant copies are normal; write plain C, the -O2 steering levers are inert here. - SS127a: SS71 sibling-first is the STRONGEST -O0 lever — an -O0 TU is a near-uniform code regime, so a banked sibling's shape transfers far better than at -O2. - SS127b: two agents' decisive levers came from a SOURCE COMMENT in ov_SC01_077_o0.c, not from docs/. Promote levers out of source comments or every future agent re-buys them. Checkpoint records the wave AND its honest ROI: 1.33M tokens for 12 banks and +0.00pp headline. The value is contingent on three reach-138 functions, and all three are currently unpropagated (func_8013C08C 0/137, SS94 type-carry) or gate-failed (func_8013BD74 CARVE-REFUSED, func_8013B83C CC1-FAIL). Fix propagation before wave 2 — drafting more x2-reach targets is not where the leverage is.
This commit is contained in:
Drew T
@@ -363,7 +363,6 @@
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-01 06:44:24", "addr": null, "name": "func_80182724", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 10, "where_stuck": "residual: 10 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_80182724.c", "binary": "ov_SC02_027", "source": "bulk-harvest", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-01 06:44:56", "addr": null, "name": "func_8017F624", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 9, "where_stuck": "residual: 9 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_8017F624.c", "binary": "ov_SC03_101", "source": "bulk-harvest", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-01 06:44:51", "addr": null, "name": "func_8017F0EC", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 6, "where_stuck": "residual: 6 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_8017F0EC.c", "binary": "ov_SC03_095", "source": "bulk-harvest", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-01 07:22:14", "addr": null, "name": "func_80184028", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 11, "where_stuck": "residual: 11 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_80184028.c", "binary": "ov_SC03_014", "source": "bulk-harvest", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-01 07:22:21", "addr": null, "name": "func_8018773C", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 1, "where_stuck": "residual: 1 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_8018773C.c", "binary": "ov_SC03_089", "source": "bulk-harvest", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-01 07:22:47", "addr": null, "name": "func_80182EC0", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 10, "where_stuck": "residual: 10 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_80182EC0.c", "binary": "ov_SC04_000", "source": "bulk-harvest", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-01 07:22:17", "addr": null, "name": "func_8017DB78", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 0, "where_stuck": "match_one MATCH but gate rejected (declaration/TU plumbing)", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_8017DB78.c", "binary": "ov_SC03_011", "source": "bulk-harvest", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
@@ -671,7 +670,6 @@
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-02 15:29:02", "addr": null, "name": "func_80186D64", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 10, "where_stuck": "residual: 10 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_80186D64.c", "binary": "ov_SC06_029", "source": "bulk-harvest", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-02 22:52:42", "addr": "0x801412a8", "name": "func_801412A8", "reach": 134, "klass": "regalloc-order", "nins": 198, "status": "near", "closeness": 110, "where_stuck": "110 mismatch (count-exact 198/198). S11 LUID(x)alloc: register-assignment permutation + prim2 store-schedule. \u00a731 permuter seed (was mis-logged 164).", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_801412A8.c", "binary": "ov_SC01_077", "source": "T1-relog", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-09 21:32:59", "addr": "0x8013bd74", "name": "func_8013BD74", "reach": 1, "klass": "struct", "nins": 198, "status": "near", "closeness": 192, "where_stuck": "none \u2014 MATCH", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_8013BD74.c", "binary": "ov_SC01_077", "source": "worker", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-14 12:56:16", "addr": "0x8013c08c", "name": "func_8013C08C", "reach": 134, "klass": "O0", "nins": 27, "status": "near", "closeness": 26, "where_stuck": "WAVE: 26 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_8013C08C.c", "binary": "ov_SC01_077", "source": "worker", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-14 12:56:25", "addr": "0x8017c294", "name": "func_8017C294", "reach": 2, "klass": "regalloc-order", "nins": 246, "status": "near", "closeness": 230, "where_stuck": "structurally matched (246 ins, param_3 in $fp, spurious psVar7[1] giv killed via", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_8017C294.c", "binary": "ov_SC01_077", "source": "worker", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-14 12:20:02", "addr": "0x80185ba4", "name": "func_80185BA4", "reach": 1, "klass": "WAVE", "nins": 177, "status": "failed", "closeness": null, "where_stuck": "won't compile standalone (loose-typing / missing decl)", "best_draft": null, "binary": "ov_SC01_077", "source": "worker", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
{"ts": "2026-07-14 19:01:18", "addr": null, "name": "func_8017D9B8", "reach": null, "klass": null, "nins": null, "status": "near", "closeness": 15, "where_stuck": "residual: 15 mismatch", "best_draft": ".run/backlog_drafts/func_8017D9B8.c", "binary": "ov_SC04_018", "source": "worker", "residual": null, "passes_tried": null}
|
||||
|
||||
+13
-3
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
> **Generated by `tools/cookbook_index.py` — do not hand-edit** (R33). Regenerate after adding a cookbook section.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> `docs/matching-cookbook.md` is ~716 KB / 337 sections. Grepping it blind is how three P30 wave-1 agents each "discovered" an idiom that was already written down. **Start here, then read the section.** A section appears under every symptom it addresses.
|
||||
> `docs/matching-cookbook.md` is ~716 KB / 342 sections. Grepping it blind is how three P30 wave-1 agents each "discovered" an idiom that was already written down. **Start here, then read the section.** A section appears under every symptom it addresses.
|
||||
|
||||
**How to use:** name what you SEE in the diff (a stolen delay slot, an extra `la`, a swapped register pair, a `conflicting types` error), find that symptom below, read those sections first. If nothing fits, THEN grind — and add a section when you win.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
|
||||
- **§125** — Split the CARVE from the BODY before calling a jr residue a wall — and measure it by SHA from a CLEAN tree (P30 SESSION-28; **this section's first draft was WRONG and the method caught it**) <sub>L8199</sub>
|
||||
- **§126** — The carve-within-a-carve: an ADDRESS RANGE is not an OPTIMIZATION REGION (P30 T2, byte-proven end-to-end) <sub>L8257</sub>
|
||||
|
||||
### optimisation level (-O0/-O2) (8)
|
||||
### optimisation level (-O0/-O2) (11)
|
||||
|
||||
- **§6** — Per-module optimization mixing — the -O0 boot module (Phase 7) <sub>L246</sub>
|
||||
- **Detecting** — the opt level (do this first) <sub>L254</sub>
|
||||
@@ -248,6 +248,9 @@
|
||||
- **§39** — The ×1→×134 giant-endgame: propagate a matched **-O2** giant via the NATIVE DEFINE-macro path (Phase 24 T7 §G close, 2026-07-08) <sub>L2530</sub>
|
||||
- **§116** — Optimization level is a property of the FILE, not the function: read a family 0/N against the member's stub HOME (Phase 29 T79) <sub>L7870</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — finding: opt level is per FILE, so the file's contents must be opt-HOMOGENEOUS <sub>L8272</sub>
|
||||
- **§127** — The `-O0` regime: the CONSTANT-OFFSET FOLD, and why `-O0` needs its own idiom set (P30 T3 wave, 15 targets) <sub>L8342</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — rest of the `-O0` regime (write PLAIN C, and mean it) <sub>L8360</sub>
|
||||
- **§127a** — §71 (sibling-first) is the strongest `-O0` lever, and it beats the index <sub>L8370</sub>
|
||||
|
||||
### family propagation & sweeps (65)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -491,7 +494,7 @@
|
||||
- **§125** — Split the CARVE from the BODY before calling a jr residue a wall — and measure it by SHA from a CLEAN tree (P30 SESSION-28; **this section's first draft was WRONG and the method caught it**) <sub>L8199</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — meta-lesson <sub>L8250</sub>
|
||||
|
||||
### (unbucketed — title matched no symptom vocabulary) (88)
|
||||
### (unbucketed — title matched no symptom vocabulary) (90)
|
||||
|
||||
- **§3-How** — to use this <sub>L30</sub>
|
||||
- **§1** — Idiom catalog (asm pattern → C that produces it) <sub>L39</sub>
|
||||
@@ -581,6 +584,8 @@
|
||||
- **§3-The** — corrected results (each SHA-verified, from a clean tree, restore re-verified) <sub>L8231</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — instrument trap that hid it (and it is §124's shape again) <sub>L8283</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — mechanics <sub>L8292</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — idiom they kept re-deriving: the constant-offset fold <sub>L8349</sub>
|
||||
- **§127b** — the knowledge was in a SOURCE COMMENT, not the cookbook <sub>L8379</sub>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## All sections, in order
|
||||
@@ -922,3 +927,8 @@
|
||||
- **§3-The** — instrument trap that hid it (and it is §124's shape again) <sub>L8283</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — mechanics <sub>L8292</sub>
|
||||
- **§126a** — a bare `except: continue` around a coverage-asserting oracle re-creates the silent skip (P30 S28) <sub>L8310</sub>
|
||||
- **§127** — The `-O0` regime: the CONSTANT-OFFSET FOLD, and why `-O0` needs its own idiom set (P30 T3 wave, 15 targets) <sub>L8342</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — idiom they kept re-deriving: the constant-offset fold <sub>L8349</sub>
|
||||
- **§3-The** — rest of the `-O0` regime (write PLAIN C, and mean it) <sub>L8360</sub>
|
||||
- **§127a** — §71 (sibling-first) is the strongest `-O0` lever, and it beats the index <sub>L8370</sub>
|
||||
- **§127b** — the knowledge was in a SOURCE COMMENT, not the cookbook <sub>L8379</sub>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8338,3 +8338,47 @@ why. A total is only trustworthy if the denominator was asserted.
|
||||
*(It also cost credibility in the other direction: I used the bad number to call the T0(f) pin of
|
||||
"2,192 open members" STALE. The pin was right. Re-derivation is only worth more than a carried number
|
||||
if the re-derivation is sound — R35 applies to the re-measurement as much as the original.)*
|
||||
|
||||
## §127 — The `-O0` regime: the CONSTANT-OFFSET FOLD, and why `-O0` needs its own idiom set (P30 T3 wave, 15 targets)
|
||||
|
||||
The `-O0` population is now large (the P30 T2 routing put **2,200+ open stubs** into `-O0` TUs), and
|
||||
a 15-target wave against it showed the cookbook is written almost entirely for `-O2`. **The index
|
||||
fired on only 3 of 15 targets**, and multiple agents INDEPENDENTLY re-derived the same idiom — the
|
||||
signature that a body of knowledge has a hole (§124's lesson applied to the index itself).
|
||||
|
||||
### The idiom they kept re-deriving: the constant-offset fold
|
||||
At `-O0`, gcc-2.7.2 folds a **constant** struct offset into the load's displacement but will NOT fold
|
||||
an **indexed** one:
|
||||
```c
|
||||
p->f /* -> lbu $v0, 3($s0) — offset folded into the load */
|
||||
p[i] /* -> addiu $v0,$s0,..; lw 0($v0) — address computed FIRST, then a 0-displacement load */
|
||||
```
|
||||
So when the target shows `lbu 3(reg)` you must write the **member access**; when it shows
|
||||
`addiu` + a 0-displacement load you must write the **indexed** form. At `-O2` these converge and the
|
||||
distinction is invisible — which is why nothing in §1–§126 covers it.
|
||||
|
||||
### The rest of the `-O0` regime (write PLAIN C, and mean it)
|
||||
- Frame-pointer prologue `addu $fp,$sp,$zero` (`21F0A003`) is the detector (§6/§116); **every** check
|
||||
needs `--o0` or you chase a phantom SIZE-MISMATCH.
|
||||
- Every local is spilled to the frame and reloaded at each use. A `0x18($fp)` spill/reload pair is a
|
||||
**real named local**, not a compiler temp — declare it.
|
||||
- Load-delay `nop`s and redundant `addu rd,rs,$zero` copies are normal; do not "clean" them.
|
||||
- Do **not** hand-optimize, do not add temporaries to help the compiler. At `-O0` the C maps almost
|
||||
1:1 to the asm; the usual `-O2` steering levers (pins, live-length dials, statement reordering) are
|
||||
mostly inert and mostly a distraction.
|
||||
|
||||
### §127a — §71 (sibling-first) is the strongest `-O0` lever, and it beats the index
|
||||
Several targets fell immediately to an **already-banked sibling in the same TU**. `func_80184868`
|
||||
matched off the exact shape banked hours earlier in the same `_o0d` file:
|
||||
```c
|
||||
s32 ret; ret = func_8001ABBC(0, 0, &D_xxxxxxxx, 0, 0); return ret;
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Before drafting an `-O0` function, read the banked functions in its own `_o0*` file.** An `-O0` TU
|
||||
is a near-uniform code regime, so a sibling's shape transfers far more reliably than at `-O2`.
|
||||
|
||||
### §127b — the knowledge was in a SOURCE COMMENT, not the cookbook
|
||||
Two agents reported their decisive levers came from the header comment at the top of
|
||||
`src/ov_SC01_077/ov_SC01_077_o0.c`, not from `docs/`. That comment is real, hard-won knowledge sitting
|
||||
where only someone already editing that file will find it. **When a lever is discovered in a source
|
||||
comment, promote it to the cookbook and leave a pointer** — otherwise every future agent pays to
|
||||
rediscover it, which is exactly what happened here across 12 of 15 targets.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,16 +4,16 @@
|
||||
# cross-binary collapsible-byte leverage: docs/duplicates.cross.md.
|
||||
|
||||
# THREE progress metrics (all matter — see the labels):
|
||||
FLEET fn-count byte-ident: 329556 / 353720 = 93.17% (REAL+LINKED+empties; FUNCTION-count, ×134-inflated — one crack counts per overlay)
|
||||
FLEET instr-weighted : 11708337 / 13141652 = 89.1% (shipped .text across main + resident + 138 overlays; the decomp.dev-DISPLAY number)
|
||||
FLEET distinct-code(uniq): 4530286 / 5634875 = 80.4% (72016/87459 unique fns; the DISTINCT-RE number)
|
||||
FLEET fn-count byte-ident: 329568 / 353720 = 93.17% (REAL+LINKED+empties; FUNCTION-count, ×134-inflated — one crack counts per overlay)
|
||||
FLEET instr-weighted : 11708919 / 13141652 = 89.1% (shipped .text across main + resident + 138 overlays; the decomp.dev-DISPLAY number)
|
||||
FLEET distinct-code(uniq): 4530868 / 5634875 = 80.4% (72028/87459 unique fns; the DISTINCT-RE number)
|
||||
MAIN game-code weighted : 436 / 60201 = 0.7% (INCLUDED in the fleet numbers above since 2026-07-22 — roadmap §1 metrics contract; LINKED-excluding Ghidra sig dated 2026-06-14; caveat is R34: no independent second oracle for a PS-X EXE, NOT drift)
|
||||
(fleet EXCLUDING main, for continuity with pre-2026-07-22 readings: 11707901 / 13081451 = 89.5%)
|
||||
(fleet EXCLUDING main, for continuity with pre-2026-07-22 readings: 11708483 / 13081451 = 89.5%)
|
||||
|
||||
FLEET REAL substantive : 327701 (of which dedup-shared 240422 via 1905 groups / 240496 instances)
|
||||
FLEET REAL substantive : 327713 (of which dedup-shared 240422 via 1905 groups / 240496 instances)
|
||||
FLEET LINKED PsyQ objs : 959
|
||||
FLEET NON_MATCHING : 7 (0 in any default build — G4)
|
||||
FLEET INCLUDE_ASM stubs : 24157
|
||||
FLEET INCLUDE_ASM stubs : 24145
|
||||
FLEET matchable : 353720
|
||||
|
||||
| binary | REAL | shared | LINKED | byte-ident | matchable | byte-ident % |
|
||||
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ FLEET matchable : 353720
|
||||
| ov_SC01_008 | 2334 | 1740 | 0 | 2336 | 2426 | 96.3% |
|
||||
| ov_SC01_009 | 2359 | 1741 | 0 | 2360 | 2507 | 94.1% |
|
||||
| ov_SC01_074 | 2340 | 1741 | 0 | 2342 | 2425 | 96.6% |
|
||||
| ov_SC01_077 | 2501 | 1707 | 0 | 2503 | 2585 | 96.8% |
|
||||
| ov_SC01_077 | 2502 | 1707 | 0 | 2504 | 2585 | 96.9% |
|
||||
| ov_SC01_080 | 2374 | 1744 | 0 | 2374 | 2512 | 94.5% |
|
||||
| ov_SC01_084 | 2395 | 1749 | 0 | 2400 | 2579 | 93.1% |
|
||||
| ov_SC02_000 | 2451 | 1788 | 0 | 2451 | 2683 | 91.4% |
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ FLEET matchable : 353720
|
||||
| ov_SC03_011 | 2361 | 1744 | 0 | 2367 | 2527 | 93.7% |
|
||||
| ov_SC03_012 | 2336 | 1744 | 0 | 2337 | 2406 | 97.1% |
|
||||
| ov_SC03_013 | 2363 | 1744 | 0 | 2363 | 2493 | 94.8% |
|
||||
| ov_SC03_014 | 2440 | 1772 | 0 | 2440 | 2685 | 90.9% |
|
||||
| ov_SC03_014 | 2451 | 1772 | 0 | 2451 | 2685 | 91.3% |
|
||||
| ov_SC03_015 | 2439 | 1772 | 0 | 2439 | 2685 | 90.8% |
|
||||
| ov_SC03_023 | 2347 | 1744 | 0 | 2348 | 2435 | 96.4% |
|
||||
| ov_SC03_024 | 2413 | 1749 | 0 | 2420 | 2641 | 91.6% |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ stub on a named wall/behemoth/queue ledger** — 140/140 byte-identical througho
|
||||
|
||||
# 🛑 SESSION-28 CHECKPOINT (2026-07-31 08:1x) — FRESH SESSION SAFE HERE
|
||||
> Supersedes SESSION-27 below. **Nothing is running. Tree lock FREE. Tree clean** but for the R23
|
||||
> `db.*.gbf` churn (never stage). **HEAD `commit:1279`** (+ this doc commit).
|
||||
> `db.*.gbf` churn (never stage). **HEAD `commit:1281`** (+ this doc commit).
|
||||
> Effort: opened **xHigh** → **Max** for the jr re-measurement and the T2 probe ladder → back to
|
||||
> **xHigh** for the driver + sweep. `make tools-health` RC=0 at session open.
|
||||
> **R22 clean-fleet run FIVE times this session, 140/140 every time.**
|
||||
@@ -206,6 +206,34 @@ probe, since the transform is byte-neutral by construction.
|
||||
bare `except: continue`, swallowing the R32 coverage assertion. True: **2,184 stubs / 138 overlays** —
|
||||
which **vindicates the T0(f) "2,192 open members" pin I had called stale**. Cookbook **§126a**.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🌊 T3 WAVE 1 (Ultracode, 30 agents, 1.33M tok) — 15 drafted / 15 rtu-confirmed / **12 BANKED**
|
||||
Target: the population the `-O0` routing made draftable. Every drafter self-checked with
|
||||
`match_one --o0` + `rtu_match --o0`; every MATCH was then re-run by an independent skeptic told to
|
||||
default to REFUTED ⇒ 15/15 confirmed, 0 disputed. **Whole-binary gate: 12/15** — textbook §52b.
|
||||
The 3 failures are NAMED INTEGRATION classes, none a compiler wall:
|
||||
`func_8013BD74` **CARVE-REFUSED** (it is a jr fn — needs the §81 carve chain; **reach 138**) ·
|
||||
`func_8013B83C` **CC1-FAIL** (real-TU compile, error not yet read; **reach 138**) ·
|
||||
`func_80184058` **PLUMBING**.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ **`func_8013C08C` (reach 138) IS BANKED BUT NOT PROPAGATED.** First sweep said "0 families" —
|
||||
the map still listed it as a stub; regenerated per the `crack-wave-sweep-map-regen` path, then the
|
||||
sweep found 137 candidates and banked **0/137**. Per **§94 a family 0/N is a TYPE-CARRY failure
|
||||
until proven otherwise**, and this body carries a §100 body-scoped typedef ⇒ lift its local types
|
||||
transitively and re-sweep. **Open, NOT a wall.**
|
||||
|
||||
📉 **ROI, honestly:** 1.33M tokens bought 12 banks and **+0.00pp headline** (93.17/89.1/80.4
|
||||
unchanged at displayed precision; distinct 72,016→72,028). The wave's real value is contingent —
|
||||
it rests on the three **reach-138** functions, and all three are currently unpropagated or
|
||||
gate-failed. **Fix the propagation before running wave 2**: drafting more ×2-reach targets is not
|
||||
where the leverage is.
|
||||
|
||||
📓 **Flywheel (R16), the uncomfortable number: the index fired on only 3/15.** Agents independently
|
||||
re-derived the same undocumented idiom, and two found their decisive levers in a SOURCE COMMENT in
|
||||
`ov_SC01_077_o0.c` rather than in `docs/`. Distilled as **§127** (the `-O0` regime: the
|
||||
CONSTANT-OFFSET FOLD `p->f`→`lbu 3(r)` vs `p[i]`→`addiu;lw 0(r)`; spills are real named locals;
|
||||
write plain C), **§127a** (§71 sibling-first is the strongest `-O0` lever — read the banked fns in
|
||||
the target's own `_o0*` file first), **§127b** (promote levers out of source comments).
|
||||
|
||||
## ▶ RESUME HERE (nothing blocked except where noted)
|
||||
0. **[T3, breadth] DRAFT the 2,200 newly-`-O0`-routed stubs** — 16 distinct addresses × ~137
|
||||
overlays, cached Ghidra-C seeds confirmed present, `match_one --o0` is the per-fn check. Crack one
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user