phase-37: T4 item (g) DONE — the one ledgered 'new' class refuses again (D_80126954 undeclared, T5's), row refreshed; the 51 TU-CONFLICT rows → 45 with today's diagnostics | 🛑 T4 in progress — the T4 ☑ line + P6 rules check NEXT (S108)

.run/P37/restruct/run_t4_ret2.log

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+share_body: census 24 s · extend (registered-incomplete) 44 classes · new (unregistered same-vram) 1 classes / 1 private sites
+  [t4_ret2] 1 classes · 1 sites in 1 TUs · 0 new headers · gating 2 binaries
+  [t4_ret2] ov_SC04_006: class 250070c4bf REJECTED — src/ov_SC04_006/../shared/ov/func_8017D0FC__250070c4.h:4: `D_80126954' undeclared (first use this function)
+  [t4_ret2] retry: 1 previous ledger row(s) of 250070c4bf dropped — this run's verdict replaces them
+  [t4_ret2] gated 2/2 binaries green · registered 0 groups · extended 0 members · rejected classes 1
+share_body: done — 1 of 1 classes in 1 batch(es); see the ledger; 24 s
+exit=0

config/dedup_exceptions.tsv

@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
 #   CROSS-SPACE  instances in different address spaces (deferred with the cross-address classes)
 # A row is evidence, not a shrug: note names the tool run and the message. Empty at the phase's open (2026-09-08).
 h_exact	reason	nins	instances	note
-250070c4bf1c7b79eaa294718f17e9d3eb438a6e	TU-CONFLICT	38	2	share_body new6: rejected in ['ov_SC04_006']; registered for 1; cause (ov_SC04_006): src/ov_SC04_006/../shared/ov/func_8017D0FC__250070c4.h:4: `D_80126954' undeclared (first use this function)
 47b7d4a04815b9d0fd1b6c329ce7bf8aa985fb10	TU-CONFLICT	154	141	share_body t4_ret1: extend of E_func_80144090 rejected in ['ov_MAIN_012', 'ov_SC02_037', 'ov_SC03_107']; cause (ov_MAIN_012): src/ov_MAIN_012/../shared/ov/func_80144090.h:11: conflicting types for `D_800A651C'
 5fd1ad0684401984d032eb95861c100cf110768a	TU-CONFLICT	123	141	share_body t4_ret1: extend of E_func_80174CB0 rejected in ['ov_SC01_000', 'ov_SC01_077', 'ov_SC06_018']; cause (ov_SC01_000): src/ov_SC01_000/../shared/ov/func_80174CB0.h:6: conflicting types for `func_80012ABC'
 7e04ee1875d81cff86833b19a385e347632ac616	TU-CONFLICT	105	141	share_body t4_ret1: extend of E_func_801749C8 rejected in ['ov_SC01_000', 'ov_SC01_077', 'ov_SC06_018']; cause (ov_SC01_000): src/ov_SC01_000/../shared/ov/func_801749C8.h:7: conflicting types for `func_80012ABC'
@@ -55,3 +54,4 @@ d50cc5103cf668a20a8885ea3fa49d385921f0c6	TU-CONFLICT	20	141	share_body t4_ret1:
 3a43941d56d4b1c4f91f53f047f7887fdc66807e	TU-CONFLICT	21	9	share_body t4_ret1: extend of E_func_8017D588 rejected in ['ov_SC02_037']; cause (ov_SC02_037): src/ov_SC02_037/../shared/ov/func_8017D588__3a43941d.h:18: too few arguments to function `func_80146C3C'
 5b6b968251699b8e8314523e396805478a91da13	TU-CONFLICT	19	9	share_body t4_ret1: extend of E_func_8017CFE4 rejected in ['ov_SC02_037']; cause (ov_SC02_037): 'src/ov_SC02_037/ov_SC02_037_jr_8015A3C8.c:3845: 
 60be554c7030d2012a6daa9d923503674e346272	TU-CONFLICT	13	3	share_body t4_ret1: extend of S_func_8017EF6C rejected in ['ov_SC03_126']; cause (ov_SC03_126): src/ov_SC03_126/../shared/ov/func_8017EF6C__60be554c.h:4: `D_80126942' undeclared (first use this function)
+250070c4bf1c7b79eaa294718f17e9d3eb438a6e	TU-CONFLICT	38	2	share_body t4_ret2: rejected in ['ov_SC04_006']; registered for 1; cause (ov_SC04_006): src/ov_SC04_006/../shared/ov/func_8017D0FC__250070c4.h:4: `D_80126954' undeclared (first use this function)

phase-ends/CURRENT_PHASE.md

@@ -770,6 +770,11 @@ bucketed by what each bucket needs before any plan is proposed. **Candidates for
   failed of 218`** (`wall=82.36 s`); `share_census --check --strict-macros --strict-text` → `S1 … 10,180 satisfied (3,507 twin-covered, 45 excepted,
   3,801 deferred cross-address), 0 VIOLATION(S) — OK`.
 
+- **S108 — item (g), the new bucket: `share_body --apply --bucket new --retry-excepted --label t4_ret2`** — the one ledgered class
+  (`0x8017D0FC`, 2 instances) `REJECTED — ov_SC04_006: func_8017D0FC__250070c4.h:4: D_80126954 undeclared` (a datum declared in one member TU
+  only — T5's canonical data declarations); `gated 2/2 binaries green`, nothing written, its row refreshed. **Item (g) DONE: the 51 TU-CONFLICT
+  rows → 45 (6 shared), every survivor carrying today's compiler line.** T4's remainder is now entirely ledgered by cause and owned by T5/T7.
+
 ## 🛑 SESSION CHECKPOINT — S108 (2026-09-12, FINAL — written for a FRESH session; the session's last commit follows this): gate 1 APPROVED, **T0 ☑ T1 ☑ T2 ☑ T3 ☑ — T4 IN PROGRESS (☐): steps (a)–(f) DONE, two owed items left** — 🛑 **T4 NEXT: (g) the 51 TU-CONFLICT rows retried through `share_body` (needs a `--retry-excepted` flag), (h) the 593 "no visible definition" rows read on one example; then the T4 ☑ line, the P6 rules check, T5 (Max for the head types); xHigh** | R22 `check-all: 218 passed, 0 failed of 218` at `06615fe89` (every one of the session's ~40 gated commits carries its own) | HEAD after this commit is the checkpoint's commit; tree clean; nothing pushed after `79b2f6f15` (Drew pushes, R6) | last batch `t4_HD8` on 1e876b0ec: 57 files (headers; 57 drawable) · 0 declaration units: 0 canonical / 0 promoted / 0 K&R marked / 0 aliases typed / 0 __builtin_abs → abs / 0 kept · compiles 0 i
 
 **Replay this block into the chat at the next session start (R64); it is the ONLY in-phase context the next session inherits. Everything below