- wave D (48 adapt cards): 47/48 standalone, 45 BANKED across two gates (40 + 5 late-repair).
Operational lesson: build the gate slate AFTER the repair stage lands — the first slate was
built early and 5 rescued drafts needed a second gate.
- wave C (35: 11 tell + 24 weak): 32 banked, 91% gate. Weak lane proven 24/24 on haiku.
- MAIN BLOCKER DIAGNOSED (the night's most valuable finding): main drafts are byte-correct yet
gate 0/4. Byte-diff of the built EXE = exactly 2 bytes in 413,696, NOT in the drafted fn: a
jal at 0x80060E74 retargets func_80061FA8 (game code, 800c2.o) -> firstfile (PsyQ libapi
A66.o). Adding one C fn perturbs symbol resolution between game code and the LINKED PsyQ
archives. main is an INTEGRATION wall, not a matching wall -> its own lane; excluded from
build_wave_atlas by default.
- build_wave_atlas.py now packs by (binary, TU) — the REAL gate-group key, since each group is
one whole-binary rebuild (wave D: 42 drafts / 23 groups = the throughput ceiling).
- 3 NEARs enqueued as grinder fuel incl. func_80183578 at close=1 DELAY-SLOT (§60a precedent).
- the old glob('src/<binary>/*.c') found nothing for main (sources live at src/*.c), so every
main draft grouped under src=None: an R36 consumer-blindness, latent because main has never
been wave-gated (main is 0.5% matched, the largest coherent mass left)
- derive from corpus.stubs()[..].path instead; NC'd 3 ways: still-open wave-C drafts 3/3 agree,
overlay sample 96/96 agree (no regression), main now resolves None -> src/800.c
- tools/build_wave_atlas.py: wave selection off the frontier atlas, optimized for GATE
THROUGHPUT (gate cost scales with (binary,TU) groups, not drafts: wave C was 1.3 drafts per
rebuild; atlas selection concentrates to ~96) and weighted toward instruction mass
- wave C: 35 cards (11 tell + 24 weak) -> 35/35 standalone (re-verified independently, R14)
-> 32 banked / 3 near, 91% gate, 0 symbol failures (Law 4 prevention worked)
- weak lane proven for the first time: 24/24 on haiku; 890 candidates remain
- reach measured: 32 exemplars, 8 with sharers, x2 each => ~1.25x effective (the x134
era ended in P25/29/30) -> throughput, not leverage, is now the lever
- tools/build_wave.py (pool=adapt|weak, corpus-derived open-stub filter, R35 gate guard)
- 3 self-inflicted instrument defects found+fixed+NC'd (P9, recorded not buried):
pgrep self-match via shell=True; corpus.stubs() is addr->Stub not names (nearly
declared both card pools spent); a wave fired on hand-typed placeholder cards (stopped)
- STRATEGIC: card lanes are ~0.23% of open ins/wave; the Atlas's head-crack bucket is
1,276 groups / 186k ins with high-reach groups up to 265 instances -> retarget waves
at atlas groups next
Drew T