Wave-V token accounting picked this lever: drafting is 88.3% of a wave's output tokens (repair 8.4%,
reconcile 3.2%) at 9.3 match_one compiles per agent, so the leverage is in what a drafter must GUESS
before its first compile. Two such guesses are answered in the tree and were on nobody's card:
callee arity/return type (§195-A: NO positive tell exists in the asm, the procedure is a two-arity
A/B) and global type (every CONFLICTING-EXTERN drop). tools/decl_prior.py indexes 4,162 files ->
67,094 symbols (9,739 with a banked DEFINITION); cards now carry the rows for their own target's
symbols, ranked DEF > TU (authoritative, wave law 2) > FLEET modal + rivals with counts.
Control draw: 63 rows over 10 cards, 83% already settled by the destination TU (still a saving --
the agent was grepping for them by hand), 17% with no local answer at all.
Third instance in one session of the same law (§193-A seed_ref, §194-E tu_ref, §196): the answer was
already computed and the card did not carry it.
Drew T
e24220aabe