mirror of
https://github.com/Druthulu/BFM-decomp
synced 2026-09-26 21:36:06 -04:00
Drew T
2cc49d0310
The first jtbl-routed bank of the session, and it validates the whole chain end-to-end:
1. jtbl_carve SPLIT-TABLE repair (this session): jtbl_801D7FB0 28 -> 50 words (112 -> 200 B),
authorized by func_8012AAAC's own `sltiu 0x32`.
2. NEW FIX — SINGLE-TABLE PREDECESSOR: adding a second table to a subseg whose existing carve was
single-table lost the FIRST table's start entirely (new_offs has only the new one;
overlay_jtbl_addrs cannot see the old one because its owner is banked and extract PRUNED the
stub .s; and single-table carves persist no tables= to rebase). The span then failed its own
validator with "first must equal the span start" — the invariant naming the missing entry.
A single-table carve spans exactly its one table, so ITS SPAN START *IS* THAT TABLE'S START:
inference, not persistence, so it also works for spans carved before tables= existed. This is
the RECOVERABLE half of the documented func_8013F350 lesson (that one was a pre-§8e merged
DOUBLE — two tables, no record, genuinely unrecoverable).
Result: ov_SC01_077_a JTBL_PADS := 0,0 tables=+0x0,+0x14. Carve alone byte-gated BYTE-IDENTICAL
BEFORE the bank was attempted (§81 step 2).
3. ARITY axis, all-or-nothing: 1,244 decl sites / 1,240 files `(void)` -> `()` + an R32 completion
assertion (old-form remaining: 0).
4. ONE call-site cast: the definition lands at line 811 and a 0-arg call sits at 822, so gcc sees
the prototype and rejects it — `((void (*)(void))func_8012AAAC)()` (§17a-1; gcc folds the cast
of a known symbol to a direct jal). Only 1 of the 1,386 fleet-wide 0-arg call sites needed it:
the others see only the `extern ()` decl, which permits a 0-arg call.
DIAGNOSIS NOTE: the failure read CC1-FAIL with only a warning visible under make. Running the
pipeline stage-by-stage (cpp | cc1 | maspsx | jtbl_rodata_pads | as) put it on cc1 rc=33, and cc1's
own stderr named it exactly: "too few arguments to function func_8012AAAC" at line 994. Isolating
the stage was what turned an opaque Error 33 into a one-line fix.
R22 clean-fleet: extract-all 139/139, check-all 140 passed / 0 failed.
family_sweep correctly REFUSED this exemplar (§53: a jr-family must route through
jtbl_family_bank.py; "a 0% from this path would be a TOOL artifact, not a wall") — the ×137 member
sweep is the next step and needs a clean tree, which this commit provides.