mirror of
https://github.com/Druthulu/BFM-decomp
synced 2026-09-26 21:36:06 -04:00
Drew T
37e5a19558
family_sweep --hseq --band all --only <4 cores> -j12 -> 143 banked / 405 failed. R22 clean-fleet
140 passed, 0 failed of 140; dedup-check 1886/0. Fleet 85.3 -> 85.4% instr, 75.8 -> 76.0% distinct,
90.50 -> 90.54% fn-count.
Unlike T33's 548/548, this sweep mostly failed — so the failures were DIAGNOSED, not accepted:
- func_80138C60 swept 137/137 clean.
- func_8013B6A0 / func_8013B598 swept 1/137 each — EXPECTED, not a regression: Phase 20 byte-proved
the -O0 cluster is OVERLAY-LOCAL, so their siblings need per-overlay _o0 carves that do not exist.
- func_80177DA8 swept 4/137 — ROOT CAUSED: its banked def is K&R and its own TU declares it no-proto,
but NON-SC07 overlays declare a PROTOTYPE (extern void func_80177DA8(s32,s32,s32)), so the remap
conflicts. The 4 successes are SC07 overlays, which declare it not at all.
THE SYNTHESIS: that is the SAME §99 K&R-vs-prototype class as item 3's func_80140D68 (K&R def vs 138
prototype callers). ONE conform_decls pass unlocks both — ~17,000 instructions. conform_decls exists
for exactly this ("the draft's signature is byte-TRUTH; move the DECLS, never the draft"). NOT run:
it is a fleet-shared 138+-declaration change and this session already tripped one shared-state
hazard, so it wants an explicit go-ahead (P5).
MY ERROR, recorded: I read a `head -6` list of modified dirs as the complete set and briefly thought
the sweep's count did not reconcile. Measured properly it does — 143 stubs removed across 142 files.
Same class as grepping the wrong field earlier today: truncated output is not exhaustive output.