137/137 banked, 0 failed via jtbl_family_bank. R22 clean-fleet 140 passed / 0 failed of 140; report
fail-closed green (dedup 1886/0, C1 coverage 239604/239604, 0 NON_MATCHING).
MEASURED: fn-count 318,447 -> 318,585 (+138); instr-weighted 83.9 -> 84.0% (+12,558 ins);
distinct-code 73.2 -> 73.4% (+131 unique fns — byte-VARIANT members, so unlike func_801330E0's
byte-identical family this one moves the distinct number too).
Closes the function REFUSED since SESSION-21 — correctly refused, since conforming its 660
declarations without first casting its 138 zero-arg call sites would have broken 138 binaries.
Also logged (T21): the sweep-throughput measurement. Drew was right that parallelism was proven and
adopted (Makefile JOBS=16; sweep_parallel.py -j12 built SESSION-20 after measuring an 8-16x loss),
but NEITHER sweep tool calls it — the adapter is reachable only via a manual --stage-only two-step,
so three sweeps today ran serially for no reason. The -j theory was wrong and measurement said so:
make is ~5s of the 16s per sibling (the loop runs up to FOUR builds per sibling), so -j16 is a 12%
win, kept but minor. The real 8-16x lever is blocked on revert() restoring the SHARED
config/overlays.mk from git — designed, not built. An attempt to wire family_sweep's parallel default
broke it twice and was reverted rather than committed.
Drew T
3d01aaea8c