mirror of
https://github.com/Druthulu/BFM-decomp
synced 2026-09-28 23:00:29 -04:00
Drew T
a884d5f5d6
The first sweep returned "banked 0 / skipped {'pinned-exemplar': 137}" — a SKIP, not a failure. The
§42e guard refuses pinned exemplars to avoid a cc1 SIGABRT, but Phase 27 BYTE-PROVED that crash was
extract_unit dropping file-scope macros (a TOOL bug, fixed by _carry_macros), not a compiler limit.
Re-run with --allow-pins: 133/137 BANKED. R22 clean-fleet 140 passed / 0 failed of 140.
MEASURED: fn-count 318,585 -> 318,720 (+135); instr 84.0 -> 84.2% (+25,423 ins); distinct-code
73.4 -> 73.9% (+127 unique fns).
THE GUARD IS NOW COSTING BANKS — the same shape as sweep_parallel being opt-in: a protection that was
correct when written, whose cause was later removed, still defaults ON. Measured cost on ONE family:
137 skipped, 133 bank fine. Phase 27's roadmap delta already said the PINS class was back on the
table; nothing changed the default. Flipping it is a one-line change, deliberately deferred to a
fresh session — that is exactly how family_sweep got broken twice today.
SC07 QUARTET, third occurrence today, now named: ov_SC07_006/007/010/011 refused again (same four as
func_80176218). NOT broken — func_8014CF04, func_8015D1B8 and func_801789AC all swept them cleanly.
The correlation is the sibling TU (_jr_8016AE5C.c, a different carve layout; these 4 were onboarded
in Phase 27 with code at PAC entry 1). §59: read ONE sibling's real gate result before concluding.
func_80175DA8 0/137 is the §94 TYPE-CARRY signature (local typedef Sp_80175DA8 templated as a body
but not as a type) — the same shape that took func_8016B6BC 0/137 -> 137/137 today. Named next step,
31,878 templated instructions.