A wave is now sized by INSTRUCTION MASS, not card count. The metric is instruction-weighted, so a
wave is worth what its instructions are worth: the 12-42-ins card lanes carried ~1,400 ins/wave
(~0.011pp, ~440 waves to finish) while wave O carried 6,266 ins at the same gate cost and the same
draft rate.
build_wave_atlas --target-ins draws cards until the instruction budget is met (still capped by n)
and refuses to under-fill silently. Standard recipe: --target-ins 6500 --min-ins 60 --max-ins 200
--max-bins 4, levers now including UNKNOWN.
THE MEASUREMENT BEHIND IT: draft rate barely decays with size -- wave M 98% at avg 51 ins, wave N
92% at avg 65, wave O 96% at avg 128. Mass is nearly free.
THE UNKNOWN UNLOCK: UNKNOWN is not a difficulty label, it means the atlas could not name a lever,
and it had been routed as needing its own bespoke lane. Wave O's 22-card R37 probe drafted it like
any other lane -- reclassifying ~138k ins (a quarter of everything open) as ordinary wave fuel.
With UNKNOWN in, 9,224 fns / 417,325 ins = 70% of all open instructions are agent-draftable; the
60-200-ins mass band alone is 164,357 ins ~= 27 waves, and is the band to work first.
Also banks the five-step PRE-GATE PROTOCOL (independent re-verify -> reloc_identity -> dry-run to
0-dropped -> reconcile declarations toward the form the match needs -> gate), cookbook §176g.
Drew T
0753641d4b