WAVE-2 MEASURED THE INDEX: 15/19 index hits and the bank rate went 57% (wave 1, no index) -> 79%
(wave 2, index-first) on the same gate. Agents also NAMED its gaps, which is the flywheel working.
Two real defects found and fixed:
1. COVERAGE. The parser required a '§' prefix, so 111 h2-h4 headers were invisible — including
'### T4 — Branch polarity', the fix match_one names by class (BRANCH-POLARITY) and which two
agents re-derived by hand, and the §1/§2 idiom-catalog entries (I1-I4, T1-T4).
2. THE ASSERTION ITSELF. My R32 check compared §-headers-parsed against §-header-CANDIDATES — a
tautology over a set I had already narrowed. R32 says the candidate set must OVER-approximate;
it now counts EVERY header and accounts for each as indexed-or-explicitly-skipped. The tool
written to stop silent skips had the silent-skip defect.
3. Keyword matching over titles cannot surface an idiom whose title omits the symptom, so the
index now opens with a hand-curated SYMPTOM -> section list, seeded from what agents actually
hit (branch polarity, (void)-canon conflicting types, asm-label alias, one-base-register reuse,
folded andi, slti/sltiu, sibling-first, delay-slot theft, void->s32).
Drew T
c14f15a09f