MEASURED, and it inverts the obvious plan. "Bank the clean drafts now, recover the conflicted ones
later" is backwards: of 18 wave-O/P drafts parked and re-verified still MATCH, only 1 survived
resolve_conflicts once their wave had banked -- versus 5 before it.
The mechanism: a banked draft's declarations BECOME the TU's, so every parked draft that merely
disagreed with a SIBLING now disagrees with the FILE, which is the stricter arbiter (a sibling
clash can be settled by editing either side; a file clash only by editing the draft, and some
cannot be settled at all because gate_main reverts src/ before every build). Worse, the auto-rename
that reconciles a cosmetic clash pre-bank becomes a DUPLICATE TYPEDEF post-bank, because the name
it renames to is now defined in the file.
So iterate the dry run to `N -> N compatible, 0 dropped` BEFORE spending the first rebuild, and
budget reconciliation into the wave rather than after it.
pregate_check: DUPLICATE-TYPEDEF now fires on ANY redefinition, not only differing bodies. C89 has
no compatible-redefinition allowance for typedefs, and my first version missed exactly the case the
tool exists for -- two identical `OtBlk_80016450` definitions, which the compiler rejected on the
next rebuild. Measured, not reasoned.
Also banks the auto-reconciler's rule: tell a COSMETIC clash from a REAL one by comparing struct
BODIES, not names. OtBlk_80015498 vs OtBlk_80016450 are the same {s32 a; s32 b[4];} and rename
byte-identically (both re-verified MATCH); Elem12 vs B12 genuinely differ and were refused.
Drew T
74a95af4c1